Manufacturing Evidence

Timshel

New member
http://www.reason.com/news/printer/131527.html

For most of the last 20 years, doctors Steven Hayne and Michael West have served as expert forensic witnesses for the state of Mississippi. Until 2008, Hayne served as the de facto state medical examiner, dominating a criminal autopsy market in which prosecutors contract out examinations to favored private doctors. West, a dentist, served one term as the elected coroner in Forest County, Mississippi in the 1990s and partly through his work with Hayne became a popular bite-mark examiner among prosecutors. Both men have come under intense scrutiny for questionable working procedures and dubious testimony—West off and on for 15 years, Hayne mostly in the last two. Reason has been following Hayne's deteriorating career since an October 2006 article that detailed his role in putting a possibly innocent man named Cory Maye on death row (see an archive of our Hayne-related reporting at: www.reason.com/hayne).

Last year, two men that Hayne and West helped convict of murder in the early 1990s, Levon Brooks and Kennedy Brewer, were exonerated and freed from prison through DNA testing after serving more than 30 years combined behind bars. Both men had been accused of raping and murdering the daughters of their respective girlfriends. In what has come to be a pattern with the two doctors, in each case Hayne claimed to have found in an initial autopsy what other examiners missed: bite marks on the victim's body. He then called in West, a forensic odontologist (dental examiner), who definitively matched bite marks to the defendants. Partly because of the testimony from Hayne and West, Brooks was sentenced to life in prison, and Brewer to death (he spent 14 years on death row). DNA testing in 2008 determined that the semen found on both girls belonged to a third man, 51-year-old Albert Johnson. As Brooks and Brewer were freed, Johnson confessed to both crimes.

The Brooks and Brewer cases form their own forensics riddle: How could West and Hayne have definitively linked previously undetected bite marks on the victims to two men who didn't commit the murders?

Reason recently obtained shocking video from another Hayne and West collaboration that may shed light on the question. In 1993, the two conducted an examination on a 23-month-old girl named Haley Oliveaux of West Monroe, Louisiana, who had drowned in her bathtub. The video shows bite marks mysteriously appearing on the toddler's face during the time she was in the custody of Hayne and West. It then shows West repeatedly and methodically pressing and scraping a dental mold of a man's teeth on the dead girl's skin. Forensic scientists who have viewed the footage say the video reveals not only medical malpractice, but criminal evidence tampering.
 
Brewer to death (he spent 14 years on death row).

Holy shit! We definitely need to make our death row move faster. I agree with Conservatives. ONe appeal if you have good evidence and then they take you out back and shoot you in the head, and bill your family for the bullet LOLZ.
 
http://www.reason.com/news/printer/131527.html

For most of the last 20 years, doctors Steven Hayne and Michael West have served as expert forensic witnesses for the state of Mississippi. Until 2008, Hayne served as the de facto state medical examiner, dominating a criminal autopsy market in which prosecutors contract out examinations to favored private doctors. West, a dentist, served one term as the elected coroner in Forest County, Mississippi in the 1990s and partly through his work with Hayne became a popular bite-mark examiner among prosecutors. Both men have come under intense scrutiny for questionable working procedures and dubious testimony—West off and on for 15 years, Hayne mostly in the last two. Reason has been following Hayne's deteriorating career since an October 2006 article that detailed his role in putting a possibly innocent man named Cory Maye on death row (see an archive of our Hayne-related reporting at: www.reason.com/hayne).

Last year, two men that Hayne and West helped convict of murder in the early 1990s, Levon Brooks and Kennedy Brewer, were exonerated and freed from prison through DNA testing after serving more than 30 years combined behind bars. Both men had been accused of raping and murdering the daughters of their respective girlfriends. In what has come to be a pattern with the two doctors, in each case Hayne claimed to have found in an initial autopsy what other examiners missed: bite marks on the victim's body. He then called in West, a forensic odontologist (dental examiner), who definitively matched bite marks to the defendants. Partly because of the testimony from Hayne and West, Brooks was sentenced to life in prison, and Brewer to death (he spent 14 years on death row). DNA testing in 2008 determined that the semen found on both girls belonged to a third man, 51-year-old Albert Johnson. As Brooks and Brewer were freed, Johnson confessed to both crimes.

The Brooks and Brewer cases form their own forensics riddle: How could West and Hayne have definitively linked previously undetected bite marks on the victims to two men who didn't commit the murders?

Reason recently obtained shocking video from another Hayne and West collaboration that may shed light on the question. In 1993, the two conducted an examination on a 23-month-old girl named Haley Oliveaux of West Monroe, Louisiana, who had drowned in her bathtub. The video shows bite marks mysteriously appearing on the toddler's face during the time she was in the custody of Hayne and West. It then shows West repeatedly and methodically pressing and scraping a dental mold of a man's teeth on the dead girl's skin. Forensic scientists who have viewed the footage say the video reveals not only medical malpractice, but criminal evidence tampering.

Surely the death penalty is an effective deterrent though right?
 
I'd say these two 'pathologists' need to be tried and convicted of numerous counts of USC 1942, violations of civil rights under color of law. then throw away the key.
 
I'd say these two 'pathologists' need to be tried and convicted of numerous counts of USC 1942, violations of civil rights under color of law. then throw away the key.

And they should go after the DAs and cops that used them too. The rule of law is cheapened, so long as we allow these crimes to go unpunished.

There is also something to be said here about being skeptical of so called "experts."
 
All people who accept the death penalty should be executed, IMHO.

I have no reservations about doing away with the death penalty, so long as it does not step on the necessary division of power between local, state and feds.

But, putting them in jail for life would barely make this a lesser injustice. Hayne and West engaged in falsifying evidence. I am sure a lot of the victims were guilty anyway, but that does not make it right.
 
I have no reservations about doing away with the death penalty, so long as it does not step on the necessary division of power between local, state and feds.

But, putting them in jail for life would barely make this a lesser injustice. Hayne and West engaged in falsifying evidence. I am sure a lot of the victims were guilty anyway, but that does not make it right.

Well they deserve to be put in prison for life for falsifying evidnce, and sentenced to death for supporting the death penalty. Makes perfect sense. It'll happen once I'm king.
 
Don't you live in Mississippi? Though it would be a lot easier, you don't have to be king to have an impact.

BTW, Radley Balko deserves some kind of reward for his blogging. NOBODY does it better.
 
And they should go after the DAs and cops that used them too. The rule of law is cheapened, so long as we allow these crimes to go unpunished.

There is also something to be said here about being skeptical of so called "experts."

The scary part is that this is not an isolated incident. Such abuses are endemic to the justice system. Jurors take it at fact value that the evidence presented is correct and factual. Obviously that's not always the case and the scary part, as the OJ case demonstrated, if you don't have the money to pay for your own expert testimony and forensic investigations, you're fucked.
 
http://www.reason.com/news/printer/131527.html

For most of the last 20 years, doctors Steven Hayne and Michael West have served as expert forensic witnesses for the state of Mississippi. Until 2008, Hayne served as the de facto state medical examiner, dominating a criminal autopsy market in which prosecutors contract out examinations to favored private doctors. West, a dentist, served one term as the elected coroner in Forest County, Mississippi in the 1990s and partly through his work with Hayne became a popular bite-mark examiner among prosecutors. Both men have come under intense scrutiny for questionable working procedures and dubious testimony—West off and on for 15 years, Hayne mostly in the last two. Reason has been following Hayne's deteriorating career since an October 2006 article that detailed his role in putting a possibly innocent man named Cory Maye on death row (see an archive of our Hayne-related reporting at: www.reason.com/hayne).

Last year, two men that Hayne and West helped convict of murder in the early 1990s, Levon Brooks and Kennedy Brewer, were exonerated and freed from prison through DNA testing after serving more than 30 years combined behind bars. Both men had been accused of raping and murdering the daughters of their respective girlfriends. In what has come to be a pattern with the two doctors, in each case Hayne claimed to have found in an initial autopsy what other examiners missed: bite marks on the victim's body. He then called in West, a forensic odontologist (dental examiner), who definitively matched bite marks to the defendants. Partly because of the testimony from Hayne and West, Brooks was sentenced to life in prison, and Brewer to death (he spent 14 years on death row). DNA testing in 2008 determined that the semen found on both girls belonged to a third man, 51-year-old Albert Johnson. As Brooks and Brewer were freed, Johnson confessed to both crimes.

The Brooks and Brewer cases form their own forensics riddle: How could West and Hayne have definitively linked previously undetected bite marks on the victims to two men who didn't commit the murders?

Reason recently obtained shocking video from another Hayne and West collaboration that may shed light on the question. In 1993, the two conducted an examination on a 23-month-old girl named Haley Oliveaux of West Monroe, Louisiana, who had drowned in her bathtub. The video shows bite marks mysteriously appearing on the toddler's face during the time she was in the custody of Hayne and West. It then shows West repeatedly and methodically pressing and scraping a dental mold of a man's teeth on the dead girl's skin. Forensic scientists who have viewed the footage say the video reveals not only medical malpractice, but criminal evidence tampering.

Where's the news?

This is the American Injustice System to the core.

Without even researching, I'm betting I know the race of the men who've been falsely accused.

And Americans act "shocked."

... bullshit.
 
I have no reservations about doing away with the death penalty, so long as it does not step on the necessary division of power between local, state and feds.

But, putting them in jail for life would barely make this a lesser injustice. Hayne and West engaged in falsifying evidence. I am sure a lot of the victims were guilty anyway, but that does not make it right.
There is only one problem I have with it. If somebody is already up for a lifetime with never a shot at any parole, there is nothing to use to stop them from attempting to kill witnesses, to subjugate the jury, to do any desperate move to keep themselves out of prison.
 
Where's the news?

This is the American Injustice System to the core.

Without even researching, I'm betting I know the race of the men who've been falsely accused.

And Americans act "shocked."

... bullshit.

I don't think this is a racially motivated at you would think. I think the racism occurs on the level of police and prosecutors determining who they will prosecute. I think these cretins would be just as likely to use false evidence against anyone to assist prosecutors with a "Win at all costs" mentality.
 
I don't think this is a racially motivated at you would think. I think the racism occurs on the level of police and prosecutors determining who they will prosecute. I think these cretins would be just as likely to use false evidence against anyone to assist prosecutors with a "Win at all costs" mentality.

I think the criminal injustice system is far more racially motivated than you believe .. and America's exploding prison system is testament to that truth.

The police, courts, public opinion, and criminal injustice system do not work in favor or equally for non-white Americans.

I teach that to my children.
 
There is only one problem I have with it. If somebody is already up for a lifetime with never a shot at any parole, there is nothing to use to stop them from attempting to kill witnesses, to subjugate the jury, to do any desperate move to keep themselves out of prison.

Hard labor, solitary confinement, ect.
 
There is only one problem I have with it. If somebody is already up for a lifetime with never a shot at any parole, there is nothing to use to stop them from attempting to kill witnesses, to subjugate the jury, to do any desperate move to keep themselves out of prison.

If someone is going to be executed why wouldn't they do that anyway?

Clearly, people suspected of horrific murders shouldn't be released on bail. If they're sufficiently contained they'd never have the opportunity. If they're already in prison for a murder, then how are they going to get out of it to kill witnesses and subjugate the jury?

There are already many people up for life without parole, and these crime sprees rarely happen as long as proper safety precautions are taken (I don't consider how they contained the man in Atlanta "proper safety precautions").
 
Back
Top