IBDaMann
Well-known member
Not where they are illegal.
Same Sex Marriages
- Thread starter Phantasmal
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I'll assume that's a "no."
Laws can be wrong.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
If it's a marriage then it's legal, not illegal.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Absolutely.
Agree.
The Religious Cults can believe in anything they want. Here in America, the Constitution is what our Law is based on.
In Saudi Arabia, their 'Constitution' is the Koran. Heretics and Witches are still being beheaded.
So you can't say how polygamy or same-sex marriage would affect you, personally.
Just some ambiguous fuming about following the rule of law, or something.
Well, same-sex marriage IS following the law. I don't really see how polygamy, if legalized, would be any different.
If someone else's marriage affects you personally, then I don't know what the fuck to say to you. Get a life.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
What does the bible say about Mother Fuckers- like in Cain and Abel's case?
Nothing obviously!
Yes, the Bible states that God Created a Man (Adam) and Woman (Eve), but never mentions creating any more men or women, so, one would have to suspect, for humanity to survive, Cain and Abel would have had to copulate with their own Mother (Eve).
History's first motherfuckers.
This is a thread about same-sex marriage.
Then you should REALLY fucking hate Trump.
Gay marriage IS THE LAW.
Same-sex marriage is legal in the US.
So you're the one who has no respect for the law here.
You responded to it, jackass.
Right...the subject of this thread. A subject you clearly don't like since you're spamming the board with bullshit replies and non-sequiturs.
He is gods representative on earth.
Is this the part where you say the judgement was due to people being inhospitable to strangers???
Judgment has but one "e."
Is this the part where you say the judgement was due to people being inhospitable to strangers???
Let's say that the story is about sexuality. What were they trying to do to angels?
Bingo!
Unless they are making a choice (something I've never done)...I do not understand why they are so insistent that it is a choice.
In any case, why would anyone "choose" to be homosexual...and take all the shit that comes one's way with that "choice."
The entire "It is a choice" or "It is a preference" thing is crap.
Originally Posted by IBDaMann View Post
"Stupid question! All your questions are stupid. Now you want to know how people breaking the law affects me. Now you want to know how I am affected by eliminating the rule of law."
No, moron. He wants to know how abrogation this particular law affects people who are not gay.
Laws have different rationales. This one's rationale is formed in theology and judgment of sin. It cannot be compared to speed limit,
or tax evasion, or theft. Their rationales do not logically depend of theology, they depend on the fact that they make people safer, and create fairness
in public finance, and respect for the individual right to own property.
Your inability to distinguish made you make an absurd statement like "eliminating the rule of law." Like ALL republicans, you are patently inferior
and entirely incapable of rational discourse. You can NEVER defeat a liberal in argument because you are stupid, can't marshal facts, can't apply facts
to rules, have no moral compass and are superstitious and oblivious like the total moron you are, to the precepts upon which your dumbass tapestry of prejudices
derive, fucking loser fool.
"Stupid question! All your questions are stupid. Now you want to know how people breaking the law affects me. Now you want to know how I am affected by eliminating the rule of law."
No, moron. He wants to know how abrogation this particular law affects people who are not gay.
Laws have different rationales. This one's rationale is formed in theology and judgment of sin. It cannot be compared to speed limit,
or tax evasion, or theft. Their rationales do not logically depend of theology, they depend on the fact that they make people safer, and create fairness
in public finance, and respect for the individual right to own property.
Your inability to distinguish made you make an absurd statement like "eliminating the rule of law." Like ALL republicans, you are patently inferior
and entirely incapable of rational discourse. You can NEVER defeat a liberal in argument because you are stupid, can't marshal facts, can't apply facts
to rules, have no moral compass and are superstitious and oblivious like the total moron you are, to the precepts upon which your dumbass tapestry of prejudices
derive, fucking loser fool.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
There's an old saying "Republicans believe everything is genetic except homosexuality. Democrats believe nothing is genetic except homosexuality."
Agreed it's not a choice. We can only choose our actions, not our desires. IMO, the basis of the RW anti-homosexuality comes from Evangelicals and the Bible. This never happened in the Republican party until the Moral Majority was given a controlling seat at their table. Like climate change, Moral Majority Republicans are rationalizing their choice of political agenda by using pseudoscience and heated rhetoric.