NY Post Reporter Behind Dubious Hunter Biden Story Refused to Put His Name on It

"Proud Boys. Stand back and stand by."

4j3krx.jpg
Nobody told ANTIFA that.
It's going to be funny as fuck when they're out there about to throw a Molotov cocktail and get shut the fuck down with a headshot, and all their buddies fall down all around them at the same time dead. This is America, bitch. Commie pussies don't have the ass or the knowhow to take it.
America ain't playin' that, bitches. ANTIFA don't have to push very much more before getting wiped off this North American continent.
Everybody's tired of their bullshit.
 
"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

Oct 21, 2019 Tulsi Gabbard Conspiracy Theories Go Mainstream as Hillary Clinton Accuses the Candidate of Being Groomed by Russia
Gabbard called Clinton "the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long."

Clinton suggests Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein are "Russian assets." Since announcing her 2020 presidential bid, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii) has been plagued by bizarre conspiracy theories, including rumors that she's in league with Russia and that she plans a third-party run. Now Hillary Clinton has joined the theorists levying the allegations. In a recent podcast, the Democrats' 2016 nominee warned that Russia was "grooming" Gabbard "to be the third-party candidate."

Hillary Clinton combined both theories into one (while also roping in Jill Stein for good measure) on a podcast with David Plouffe. Clinton told Plouffe that she thinks a woman currently running in the Democratic presidential primary is being groomed by Russia to run as a third-party candidate:

I'm not making any predictions, but I think they've got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate. She's the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far…

Claim:
Hillary Clinton posted condolences for Tulsi Gabbard's suicide one day early.
Finding:
Labeled Satire
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clinton-gabbard-condolence/
 
"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/n...used-to-put-his-name-on-it-report/ar-BB1aaVV2

Hmm, the NYT! Given their track record I wouldn't trust anything they say.
 
Yes the media does their DAMNEDEST to play that down.

Isn't King Rama X in charge of the media in Thailand? Are you complaining that King Rama X is doing his damnedest to play down the news???

Should someone call him?
 

'I denounce racism': Black leader ,Enrique Tarrio, insists Proud Boys are not White supremacists About 10 % of the Proud boys are not white.

Trump said COVID would never go beyond 15 people. Then he said it'd be gone by April. What other bullshit do you want people to believe?
 
"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/n...used-to-put-his-name-on-it-report/ar-BB1aaVV2

Dubious? What exactly is "dubious" about this story?
 
"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/n...used-to-put-his-name-on-it-report/ar-BB1aaVV2

IRRELEVANT NOW. EMIALS ALREADY CONFIRMED BY RECIPRIENTS/SENDERS...ESPECIALLY THE CHINESE ONES.
 
"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/n...used-to-put-his-name-on-it-report/ar-BB1aaVV2

There is no Democrat or lefty on this board that can say that with a straight face. Now it is a problem? You folks live and breath by "unnamed sources" , "anonymous sources", "people close to" etc, etc. Seriously, the hypocrisy of the left as a whole is astounding.
 
Back
Top