I don't know what anyone will do. OTOH, the fact you dragged up a two year old thread means you are lonely and tired of playing with yourself.
Why is evince banned from so many threads
- Thread starter Oracle Of JPP 714
- Start date
I don't know what anyone will do. OTOH, the fact you dragged up a two year old thread means you are lonely and tired of playing with yourself.
Really? Does that theory apply across the board, or only to me?
Yes, not being able to exchange shows a lack of confidence in what you are saying
Is that right?
I must have missed your posts lecturing your fellow leftists about proclaiming that they put people on ignore.
Link up.
I'll understand if you can't, of course.
In your case, it's probably 100% accurate. For others, it depends. It's easy to fix; just explain why you decided to drag out a 2 year old thread. People can decide for themselves if it's reasonable or not.
Of course, you can just refuse to answer, which is an answer all by itself. All I'm requesting is a better theory.
What does it depend on? Whether you agree with the person's politics or not?
Lemme guess, you're lonely and tired of being threadbanned.
I actually agree with you that it's lame. The difference between us is that you are a massive user of thread bans and I've never threadbanned anyone because I don't support it. I could even see a tit-for-tat use of threadbans against fueders, but since I've never banned anyone, much less you, that doesn't explain your reasoning for massive thread bans.
People have to decide for themselves what they choose to do and why. Isn't that fair?
I'm not the one complaining about threadbans. Am I?
My exchange with Anchovies was about people proclaiming that they are putting someone on ignore, not threadbanning.
You seem to fear confrontation about your own "babies", your threads. The fact you refused to engage in honest, adult conversation, and this isn't the first time for you, proves you are a disingenuous and deceitful person.
Like I said, in your case it's probably 100% accurate. The parts you refuse to answer proves what I said and are bolded below. As always, people should decide for themselves.
So you say. If that were true, wouldn't I ban the habitual trolls from every thread I start?
Do these people "seem to fear confrontation" about their own babies, their threads?
In response to your question about posting in this thread, it was predicated by the death of RBG and the related discussion of the likelihood of Desh's demise in the War Zone.
Now that I've answered your question, I'll ask mine again.
If someone whose politics you agree with reopens an old thread, do you exhibit this kind of behavior, or not?
Glad you agree it's fear when it comes to the likes of Cypress, OwlWoman, LV, christiefan, et al and quite often guno, and many other douchebags banning me from their threads.
He bumps old discussions about Evince. With her not here, it makes the possibility of a little troll crush even more likely.
I think his only friend is the little piece of flesh between his legs.
Well, he's supposedly a Morman, so maybe his trolling is acting out.
He may have been raised Mormon, but he's certainly not one unless it's one of the flaked out cults compose of one nutjob, six wives and 30 kids hiding in the mountains eating squirrel and roots.
Quite?
I'm using your standard to apply to those I mentioned. What's wrong with that?
Trolling can often be an act in response to feeling repressed. One look at Morman undies and I feel bad for them.
Who told you that? It certainly wasn't me. I practice no religion, as a matter of fact.