FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Protectionism.
Using a nuclear bomb to swat a mosquito in the middle of New York City.
Protectionism.
No, I think its more about making fun of the resident lunatic conspiracy theorist.
It would have been clearer if Epi had mentioned the reptilian-hybrids that rule us. But it was clear enough for me.
Protectionism.
Code for racism.
Using a nuclear bomb to swat a mosquito in the middle of New York City.
You oaf. Protectionism has nothing to do with race. Americans of all races benefit when they are kept in the loop of commerce, instead of abandoned in preference for slave labor.
I can no longer resist pointing out that there have only been 42 white males prior to Obama. For some reason, we count that oaf Cleveland twice just because he lost once before getting re-elected.
Wow, freaky!![]()
Naomi Klein: The Shock Doctrine.
Most important reading in the last century .. particularly now.
How would you apply it to ensure that it doesn't, as it did in 1929, increase a bad recession into a depression?Protectionism.
How would you apply it to ensure that it doesn't, as it did in 1929, increase a bad recession into a depression?
Before you get all hyper-emotive and try to say something inane, I'm not arguing against it. I think taking an America-first approach is a good idea. I just wonder how you would apply them without shooting yourself in the face to scratch an itch.
True, it would be even more impactful to have a nation hike tariffs on American produced products when we produce so much less than we used to.I don't believe our economy now is similar enough to the economy then to have much relevance.
True, it would be even more impactful to have a nation hike tariffs on American produced products when we produce so much less than we used to.
In 1929 they tried tariffs and had to remove them, but the result was still devastating.
I'm not against protectionism, but I am against doing it in a way that will be so negatively impacting. My question was basically whether you had a different way that would result in increased incentive to purchase American goods here and to begin again producing, without causing a worse problem.
The big problem here is that the dollar isn't tied into anything. It used to be based loosely on real property but that got overinflated with the Fannie Mae thing. Now the government is simply printing money and redistributing it to the low classes (to buy votes) and government programs (to build dependency). This things going to corkscrew into a huge depression.
So, basically you are saying that tariffs are what you would implement and no other idea could possibly be effective.I don't buy any of your analysis relating to protectionism and the depression.
Basically people have no money to spend, so buying american is a moot point.
We also need to stop evaluating our economy according to a fascist analysis paradigm. We considered the economy great, right up until the point it was the worst economy in 40 yrs. Somethings wrong there.
So, basically you are saying that tariffs are what you would implement and no other idea could possibly be effective.
We've already seen the negative impact that tariffs brought during a worldwide economic crisis. I'd prefer setting positive rather than negative policy. Give some tax breaks for new production, for instance rather than hike taxes on goods people already "don't have money for."
You don't have to rewrite history, you just need to read it.Basically Im not saying that. And again, I reject your analysis of protectionism and the great depression. Last I heard it was caused by a speculative bubble and a bust on wallstreet. It's only at revisionist internationalist fascist think tanks that they're rewriting history.
But the depression was caused by a speculative wallstreet bubble and collapse. I understand the trade war scenario abstractly, I just don't think it applies much to the depression, as a causal factor.You don't have to rewrite history, you just need to read it.
It really has nothing to do with my "analysis". We put tariffs on something, they retaliated with tariffs and the consumer hurt for it. It was quite tit for tat and easy to follow, no special degrees or even skill is necessary.
You said that before? Oh well. I agree with that. And I would support any measure which would support the american worker, limiting immigration, limiting trade partners to those who have a similar concept of individual rights, and humane treatment.Once again, tariffs are not the sole policy that can be "protectionist".
Put an end to illegal immigration, that would be "protectionist" and one we could agree on. Incentivize new production. We have to be able to obtain the product in order to be able to use it. Tariffs simply will put too much out of reach if we don't have any production of our own for the product, which is too often the case.
Whether you like my "analysis" or not it is what happened. What brought us out of the Great Depression was production and great incentive to produce. While I don't advocate entering a World War and turning our production to war machines, I do certainly advocate incentivizing new production in the US so we can institute "protectionism" without causing our own downfall.
As for whether any of this will be implemented. Illegal Immigration? Doubt it. New production? I certainly hope so.