Then why do you not dispute ANYTHING from the article that the thread is about?
Congrats! Evmetro wins the thread! Doctors and nurses all over the world can now throw away their surgical masks. Kudos, dude!
Then why do you not dispute ANYTHING from the article that the thread is about?
Debunked in my sig.Masks work and it has been proven over and over.
They dont wear masks to stop viruses.Congrats! Evmetro wins the thread! Doctors and nurses all over the world can now throw away their surgical masks. Kudos, dude!
![]()
Congrats! Evmetro wins the thread! Doctors and nurses all over the world can now throw away their surgical masks. Kudos, dude!
I don't know if wearing a mask helps or not, although in most cases I comply if asked. I would also assume some masks are better than others.
I do know my glasses fog up indoors quite a bit while wearing a mask. Has the breath that fogged up my glasses been filtered?
Condoms do.
The fog is likely where your breathe went between the mask and the outside of your nose. Masks dont seal very well. It may not matter though, and there is an article in the opening post that may shed some light on this. Apparently it is a very good article, since no lefties here have disputed it.
Outside of medical care cases (doctor's office, dentist's office, etc.) and work (would lose my job if I don't at least wear it below my nose), I do not comply with the mask tyranny, even though there is a Statewide mandate. I regularly walk into grocery stores without one, and other small shops and even a restaurant last weekend without one.You can usually feel it breaking the seal around the bridge of your nose when it escapes, unless you're wearing a cloth mask (which they say is all but useless?).
In any event, I think they (some) help a little, but aren't a "stop all." As I said, I comply in most cases.
Outside of medical care cases (doctor's office, dentist's office, etc.) and work (would lose my job if I don't at least wear it below my nose), I do not comply with the mask tyranny, even though there is a Statewide mandate. I regularly walk into grocery stores without one, and other small shops and even a restaurant last weekend without one.
My 'Cult of the Mask' sig explains in more detail what this mask tyranny is really all about (and it starts with willful compliance).
Mantra 3.It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.
Mantra 3.
You must be very, very pleased with yourself. Congrats!
No doubt you are very tired.It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.
I see you still do not dispute any part of the article. I'm getting tired of winning.
Mantra 3.
You must be very, very pleased with yourself. Congrats!
![]()
It was a pretty easy win, since no lefty was able to copy n paste a quote from the article to this thread with an explanation of why it is flawed.
I see you still do not dispute any part of the article. I'm getting tired of winning.
Not a Mantra 3 at all... You're looking at the same list that I am, right??
I didn't write the list. ITN wrote (and maintains) the list.The one you wrote and maintain on your free forum? The one with "Me, Myself and Irene"? This one? https://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/59/nights-numbered-mantra-list
Yes.
I didn't write the list. ITN wrote (and maintains) the list.
It is not ITN's free forum. It is IBD's free forum.
The Cult of the Mask page on it is mostly my content (with some exceptions), and I (for the most part) am the one who maintains that almanac.
We are three different people dude... Get used to it.
So you want us to believe that there is something trump could do that you scrotum lickers would approve of?? Not only are you a fucking moron but you're a delusional asshole If you think anyone believes that.
You are reading impaired. I have read the article and presented you with peer reviewed evidence contradicting them. Have you read the abstracts? I did.
I will also repeat the charge that the articles you sighted are criticized for having to small a sample size to be statistically significant and don’t address the fact that they ignore the issue of viral adherence which I have challenged you on and you ignore but you are pretty good at making illogical circular arguments and political ad homs.
What is clear to me is you are guilty of confirmation bias by not evaluating evidence for in favor of the evidence against. Which means you don’t have clue what you’re talking about and don’t understand how scientific research works.