Again evidence that if I don't put in smilies with direct disclaimers people can't understand such things as replicative sarcasm.
Nobody here is defending Bush's miscues although there are people who defend her as a "great choice" for Senator.
Caroline "you know" Kennedy
- Thread starter RockX
- Start date
Nobody here is defending Bush's miscues although there are people who defend her as a "great choice" for Senator.
What a total buffoon you are. Biden has been involved with foreign policy issues & policy for decades. Palin lived across from Russia.
And man, have you idiots had a field day with the Depression comment, which was obviously just a gaffe. I don't think anyone thinks that Biden really believed that; well, maybe complete right-wing hacks.
Replicative sarcasm? Really?
Yes, I thought it would be apparent with the post I quoted.
I don't know to whom you are referring, but let me clarify, for the third time now, my position on this:
1) I am married to a woman being appointed to replace one of 16 women senators.
2) I am not married to Caroline Kennedy being that woman.
3) I have no problem if she is that woman, and have to admit to taking some pleasure out of how much the Kennedy name freaks out the crazy right.
There are plenty who argued that Bush's miscues were just liberal elites poking fun of Bush for being a man of the people. THose same people are attacking Senator Kennedy for saying "you know" too many times.
Noone is defending C. Kennedy.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
I would argue that deflecting the discussion by comparing Kennedy to Palin or Bush is defending Kennedy. That includes most of the posts in this thread.
It must be a disappointment of all the Ivy League professors that taught this young woman when they now hear her speak.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
No, sorry, you said it is a done deal. You are not allowed to clarify your position.
I do think it's a done deal.
But I'm going to tell you something you might find surprising - the deal wasn't done by me.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
bump for Darla...
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
sorry, please cease trying to clarify. That is not allowed.
Great. I've got bump and spurt following me around now.
Maybe I will call you two, two bumps and a spurt.
Damo do you somebody new programming the SF bot?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Sorry that your own standards are too strict for your own posts.
Tiana emailed me something very interesting, that is relevent to this thread:
A new national poll suggests that men and women don't see eye to eye on the question of whether Caroline Kennedy is qualified to serve as a U.S. senator.
Just over half of all Americans questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday say that Kennedy is qualified to be a senator: 52 percent say she is, and 42 percent disagree.
Watch: 'Maybe that day is now,' Kennedy says of seeking political office
But the poll also indicates there's a gender gap, with 57 percent of women saying Kennedy is qualified. That number drops to 47 percent among men, with 46 percent of male respondents saying Kennedy is not qualified.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/29/poll-gender-gap-over-caroline-kennedy’s-senate-run/
Now what makes this so fascinating is that of course, the opposite happened with Palin, where men were supporting her at much higher rates.
I think this really says something about men; and it's nothing good.
A new national poll suggests that men and women don't see eye to eye on the question of whether Caroline Kennedy is qualified to serve as a U.S. senator.
Just over half of all Americans questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday say that Kennedy is qualified to be a senator: 52 percent say she is, and 42 percent disagree.
Watch: 'Maybe that day is now,' Kennedy says of seeking political office
But the poll also indicates there's a gender gap, with 57 percent of women saying Kennedy is qualified. That number drops to 47 percent among men, with 46 percent of male respondents saying Kennedy is not qualified.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/29/poll-gender-gap-over-caroline-kennedy’s-senate-run/
Now what makes this so fascinating is that of course, the opposite happened with Palin, where men were supporting her at much higher rates.
I think this really says something about men; and it's nothing good.
Tell me what you think it says. Kennedy isn't ugly. It can't be that they only support good looking women.
No she isn't.
But she doesn't put it out there, wink wink, shake it, lick my lips, wink. If you know what I mean?
Digby makes a great case for Carolyn Maloney here.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/
I don't always agree with Digby, but I often do, and she is a very persuasive writer.
I honestly am not going to be upset as long as Paterson picks a liberal woman. I don't have strong leanings one way or the other. It is fun watching Sf "going monkey" over Kennedy, but...this is a good case for Maloney, and we can't run the world based on what upsets SF. though...it might not work out badly if we did.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/
I don't always agree with Digby, but I often do, and she is a very persuasive writer.
I honestly am not going to be upset as long as Paterson picks a liberal woman. I don't have strong leanings one way or the other. It is fun watching Sf "going monkey" over Kennedy, but...this is a good case for Maloney, and we can't run the world based on what upsets SF. though...it might not work out badly if we did.
Whats funny is the libtards are defending her qualifications to be a senator. Can they not find some other fucknut that can at least not sound like some retard when giving an interview.