Into the Night
Verified User
You seem to making a lot of shit up.
FINALLY, someone steps up, defends a monument, and guns down Democrat terrorists
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
You seem to making a lot of shit up.
Watch this video of Karma finally coming around and obliterating these Democrat terrorists, who tried to murder someone for objecting to their book-burning Orwellian fascism.
FINALLY. This is the only way this nationwide epidemic of DAILY Democrat political violence will ever stop. They must be made to swallow teeth or swallow lead. Bullies only understand brute force.
Antifa is a chimera. It exists in right-wing minds. It is not much more than computer cross talk. The rightys have made it a powerful force in their fantasies. What Antifa have been arrested and talked. They have arrested Boogaloo members. That is a real, not made up violent group. Just show an Antifa member who was involved in the riots.
Into the Night
Verified User
YEARS of NON-STOP Democrat terrorism in every corner of the country, and the moment someone finally makes one of you garbage human beings swallow lead, you're "disgusted" at other people for wanting to fight back?
THAT'S what's disgusting here. Your terror-apologist scumbag dishonesty.
They have been trying to start a war for years. Now, when one of them falls to a skirmish like this, they start whining.
These violent liberals have no idea what they are fucking with. They are cowards, cloaking themselves in a Constitution they reject.
They are traitors. They goal is to destroy the United States and the republic in each State. They reject the rule of law. They only want to implement an oligarchy with themselves as the 'elite'.
They deface and destroy community property. They pursue those trying to prevent them from doing so and attack them. One of them got shot for it. Good riddance.
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
Man shot at statue protest will sue city, APD
The New Mexico State Police is now investigating and Baca is charged with aggravated battery, two counts of petty misdemeanor battery and carrying a gun without a concealed carry license.
In the letter, attorney Laura Schauer Ives recounted the events at the protest that led to her client, Scott Williams, being shot. She said Baca had careened into many protesters and “inexplicably and distinctly battered three women, throwing one of them to the ground,” leading the crowd to turn on him.
https://www.abqjournal.com/1468126/attorney-man-shot-at-protest-may-sue-city-apd.html
The New Mexico State Police is now investigating and Baca is charged with aggravated battery, two counts of petty misdemeanor battery and carrying a gun without a concealed carry license.
In the letter, attorney Laura Schauer Ives recounted the events at the protest that led to her client, Scott Williams, being shot. She said Baca had careened into many protesters and “inexplicably and distinctly battered three women, throwing one of them to the ground,” leading the crowd to turn on him.
https://www.abqjournal.com/1468126/attorney-man-shot-at-protest-may-sue-city-apd.html
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
What’s amazes me, is that some people are more outraged over some breaking glass and property theft, than a Murder televised live. That says more about people than anything else, because we really aren't better than that.--Bourbon
I'm a hard left progressive liberal and Social Democrat, Bourbon, and your quote is brainless drivel.
How is violence against people and the property of people who didn't kill Floyd in Minneapolis any less unjustified than killing Floyd?
You strike me as somebody who belongs in the same cell block as those racist cops.
It's not racist for citizens of every ethnicity to hold black citizens to the same legal and moral standards that they hold themselves.
One, just as large a percentage of black people would meet that standard as everybody else.
Two, it would be racist to not hold blacks to the same standard.
One enemy of all people striving for equality is the unprincipled person whose behavior gives bigots an opportunity to slander his own whole race.
I'm a hard left progressive liberal and Social Democrat, Bourbon, and your quote is brainless drivel.
How is violence against people and the property of people who didn't kill Floyd in Minneapolis any less unjustified than killing Floyd?
You strike me as somebody who belongs in the same cell block as those racist cops.
It's not racist for citizens of every ethnicity to hold black citizens to the same legal and moral standards that they hold themselves.
One, just as large a percentage of black people would meet that standard as everybody else.
Two, it would be racist to not hold blacks to the same standard.
One enemy of all people striving for equality is the unprincipled person whose behavior gives bigots an opportunity to slander his own whole race.
Into the Night
Verified User
Unknown. You are making shit up. Also irrelevant. He was retreating. He was being pursued by the mob. One of them assaulted him and struck him with a deadly weapon. He shot the thug. The thug deserved it. A clear case of self defense.
Inversion fallacy.
Irrelevant.
Into the Night
Verified User
Nope. It is a real organization, created and funded by the Democrat party.
Nope. It is a real organization, created and funded by the Democrat party.
It is not powerful force, but they are violent.
RQAA. Seattle police arrested quite a few of them during the riots. Yes...they were proud of what they'd done and stated they are Antifa on the record.
Also true.
So is Antifa. So is BLM.
Already done. RQAA.
Into the Night
Verified User
Right. They are suing the city because they were committing a crime in the city. That'll go well. Did you know defacing public property is a crime?
They should. Where were the APD when the statue was being defaced? Where were they when people were trying to stop the mob? How come there were police everywhere AFTER the shooting? How come the police weren't there to protect people and public property?
Irrelevant.
She's going to have a tough case to make.
As soon as anyone in the crowd starts chasing him down the street, they are no longer defending themselves. They are the aggressors. One of them (Scott) hit him with a skateboard. He was surrounded by three aggressors. He shot the one that hit him with the skateboard. He didn't shoot anyone else. The shot was clean and well aimed. It was a clear case of self defense.
Walt. I have no idea why you think anything you write is even worth reading. You are obviously dumb as fuck. A Democrat of course. Just like to hear yourself sling bullshit.
So he was attacking people who were peacefully protesting to defend community property? It really does not matter, his self defense argument just went out the window.
The video literally shows the guy being tackled by a mob screaming that they were going to murder him, so at best, you can't comprehend plain English OR unmistakable video proof.
1) This is the question Democrats always want to ask when someone DEFENDS THEMSELVES against Democrat terrorists and lynch mobs, but never want to ask when a career-felon scumbag like George Floyd or Rayshard Brooks gets themselves killed breaking the law and resisting arrest.
So which is it? Do the victim's actions matter or don't they?
2) I can stand nose-to-nose with you and scream obscenities in your face all day (I know because I watch Democrats do it to people daily) and that in no way entitles you to hit me with skateboards, chase me down the street, tackle me, and tell me you're going to murder me...so WHY, exactly, do the actions of the victim matter in this? The only way they could be relevant is if the shooter assaulted someone prior, and even if he did, that still would not entitle them to chase him down and assault them back. The law covers you for self-defense only as far as getting yourself out of danger, not for revenge.
Your entire line of questioning here is about victim-blaming and making excuses for terrorists.
What Democrats mean by "evidence" is usually: "I want this to be true but have no evidence." Evidence only matters if you can produce it.
Democrats do this to people 24/7. According to your logic, menacing forfeits an individual's right to not be assaulted. Total horse shit on its face.
Trying to divert and deflect with personal attacks.
1) The 2nd Amendment is his conceal-carry permit.
2) Democrat lynch mobs don't get to terrorize everyone else out of their rights with NON-STOP unprovoked violence and then cry because they defend themselves.
3) Being alive and facing a misdemeanor weapons charge better than being lynched, and this is the choice Democrat terrorists have made NECESSARY for anyone to the right of Karl Marx to express opinions in public.
That's a YOU BEING A TERRORIST problem.
Last edited:
So we shouldn't believe our own eyes because...the daily videos of Democrat terrorists violating everyone's rights in every corner of the country are what...planted by secret Russian agents?
Ridiculous fucking moron.
Making excuses for terrorists and downplaying their NON-STOP attacks on universal human rights.
It helps having it all on video every day.
Why? Who's talking about that?
Democrats protect and make excuses for terrorists, like you're doing right now. Democrats being scumbags aiding in the violation of basic universal rights (and thus never prosecuting their own lynch mobs) cannot be used as proof that the Democrat lynch mobs do not exist. That's asinine on its face.
