I used to live in Chicago. What is your point? You realize your racism is obvious.
It's racist to point out statistic realities?
I used to live in Chicago. What is your point? You realize your racism is obvious.
It's racist to point out statistic realities?
It is when you think it is relevant. Yes.
So, should I go with progressive emotional narratives instead of facts?
I'm a bright guy and I have emotions. Make your case that because some blacks kill other blacks a cop should not be scrutinized.
I'm not saying the cop shouldn't be held accountable. I'm saying it shouldn't be a national news story. The cop will hopefully get a long prison sentence.
My point is that the media takes situations like this and blows them out of proportion. It means more ratings for them and destruction for everyone else.
Media did not cause the riots across the country.
You say you're a bright guy. If that's true, then surely you realize that Floyd's story would not have had any significant effects on various cities throughout the country if it had not been heavily spread by the media. Riots are a direct result of heavy media coverage. Only the riots in Minneapolis can be said to be independent of media coverage, because it was a local story.
It is the job of 'the media' to present information.
And the extent to which something is covered should be proportionate to its relevance. Instead, it is proportionate to whatever is most clickbaity and inflammatory.
Sorry, blaming the media for showing a black man getting murdered by a cop is not a good argument
I'll say this much -- I blame the media less for the riots than the stupidity of young people. A lot of these same idiots destroy property over sports games, so just because it's over some random black guy doesn't make it any better.
It is about police practice. I was in Los Angeles during the Rodney King riots--after the cops were judged not guilty. If one person did not video the beating the cops would have gotten away with it.
But if Floyd was white and the cop was black, do you really think it would be getting this much attention? The incident has to have the proper racial optics to get premium media coverage.
So, even if the root cause of the problem is police practice, it should be easy to see why the coverage has been so thorough.
Are you saying racism is non existent? Because that is a hard case for you to make.
Antifa going bye bye. POTUS to list as terror organization, by executive order if need be. This is good news. Hunt those scum down like the dogs they are and put them to sleep.....
Best guess.......The numbers of Antifa scum will drop like a rock as soon as shit gets real. They will very quickly go from a bunch of loud talking mini commies to a bunch of scared little punk kids living in theyre parents basement faster than a rabbit gets fucked.
Ah the dreaded Antifa, which for the most part is a group of bloggers on the dark net with a few dimwit followers who show up at protests dressed in black hoodies, only a conservative would portray them as Che Guevara plotting to overthrow the Government
But if Floyd was white and the cop was black, do you really think it would be getting this much attention? The incident has to have the proper racial optics to get premium media coverage.
So, even if the root cause of the problem is police practice, it should be easy to see why the coverage has been so thorough.
Nice strawman. I'm saying that, among the list of things that black people have to worry about, getting killed by a cop is low on that list in terms of probability.
I'm also saying that certain racial narratives determine the prominence of news coverage. There was considerably less coverage of certain black people knifing Jews in the NJ and NY areas a few months ago, for example. No riots occurred either.
Had the criminals been white people and the victims black, then you'd have a much more inflammatory story to spread.