What conservative who said Hollywood is responsible for the country's moral decay referenced Hollywood media?
What do Nazi and Confederate Flags have to do with ending the lockdown?
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
What conservative who said Hollywood is responsible for the country's moral decay referenced Hollywood media?
Well, they already do that. How many bombs have we dropped on ISIS?
But again, I'm wise enough to know not all Muslims are Islamists, but all Nazis are Nazis.
There is no such thing as Nazi-adjacent. So Flash, you're just gonna have to own your Nazi love as the real deal.
All of you!
Trump even tweeted a GIF of Thanos when he thought he was inevitable, the moment before Tony Stark snapped him away.
He also compared the treatment of him during this crisis to "Mutiny on the Bounty", which, if you've ever seen the movie, isn't about what he thinks it's about.
Trump literally said this in an interview just last year about the Universal movie "The Hunt": "[Hollywood liberals] create their own violence, and then try to blame others."
You confuse Nazis with love of 1st Amendment freedoms that gives the same freedoms to communists, ISIS, Klan, socialists, liberals...
Why do you hate freedom of expression so much?
Do you hate the ACLU?
I back up my shit...you wing it. You fake your way through it. Then you avoid responsibility for being wrong in the first place.
They are disgusting.
You confuse Nazis with love of 1st Amendment freedoms that gives the same freedoms to communists, ISIS, Klan, socialists, liberals...
Why do you hate freedom of expression so much?
Do you hate the ACLU?
Buy obviously not wise enough to read carefully. I did not write Muslims, I wrote Islamists. So, yes. All Islamists are Islamists.
Flash, you defend Nazis.
There was a word for people like that; COLLABORATOR
What happened to the collaborators after the war?
Since when is genocide a freedom of expression? You're not allowed to threaten someone. You're not allowed to scream "fire" in a crowded theater. And you're not allowed to call for the wholesale genocide of someone because of their race.
And the first amendment doesn't protect you from the social consequences of that expression.
I don't get why you say you don't love Nazis when by diminishing their ideology as merely "expression", you elevate them.
The ACLU has not said anything about killing Nazis, who the FBI says are a "national threat".
I'm old enough to remember just a day ago how you said they weren't a threat because they're "small" and "have no political power".
And then, after learning that they are a threat (thanks to me informing you because you didn't know), you compared them to ISIS, who we drop bombs on.
So...interesting parameters you're setting here. Watch how they move as this conversation continues.
Do you think that referring to me as a woman is an insult?
It's not.
It's you telling on yourself.
Is that a picture of your pretend girlfriend from Canada?
OK, but "Islamists" aren't showing up armed to state capitols and deliberately spreading a deadly virus.
Conservative Nazis are.
No what you were doing is spewing false equivalencies.
So many things wrong with your posts....
I never defended Nazis, I defended the right of everyone to exercise their 1st Amendment rights
Collaborators did more than defend Nazis and there is no war or foreign nation with which we have declared war
Genocide is murder (which you advocate). It is not a 1st Amendment freedom and can be prosecuted
Threats can be prosecuted
You can prosecute somebody for (FALSELY) yelling fired in a crowded theater if it resulted in harm
WRONG. You can call for the wholesale genocide of any person or group. You cannot act on it.
So, Islamists who commit genocide or make threats can be prosecuted.
Again, a complete lack of understanding of basic law.
Nobody said the 1st protects you from social consequences. But only intolerant ignorant dirt bags would impose social consequences on people for exercising their opinions.
An ideology is by definition thoughts which are free expression. You elevate the ideology of Islamists but have no trouble with that group who wants to commit genocide.
I compared them to ISIS because I read the link you provided about Nazis being a threat and the FBI head said they were elevated to the level of ISIS. It was your source that made that comparison.
I never said they were not a threat (since anybody can be a threat) I said they were so small that they have no political power.
You always start repeating lies when you have no more relevant information.
I didn't say the ACLU said anything about killing Nazis. I asked are you a supporter or opponent of the ACLU?
Last edited:
Yes, you have defended Nazis. Over and over. You have defended them by elevating and equating them with "the left". You do that by casually dismissing them as "small" or "no political power", and then when you do elevate them to compare them to ISIS, you suddenly reverse course on how to deal with them.
You do that to maintain this phony bOtHsIdErIsM because it's the only way you can be part of a discussion, of which you have no meaningful perspective to contribute or offer.
That's what guides all of your posts here; this compulsion to set yourself above everyone else by pretending it's all the same, either because you are incredibly lazy (which is what I think of you) or you are incredibly fearful that you're not as intuitive as you think you are.
So that's why you play dumb, or reduce everything to its most base and common denominator. I think that's intentional because you're just not a good person.
No, genocide is the wholesale extermination of an entire group of people.
And this is yet another example of how you deliberately reduce your own personal standards to make a lowest common denominator argument, which you think is a good thing, but really just makes you look like an intellectual weakling who is too afraid to confront the harsh truths that contradict everything you say, think, and believe.
It's a defense mechanism. Can't deal with genocide, so simply reduce it to murder. That way, you don't have to deal with what genocide actually is and how it's threatening to people whose heritage is being the victims of such genocides. You don't have the capability to understand that, because you've never had the education of it yourself. You've lived a coddled, shallow, un-threatening life thanks to your privilege, and because you're so steeped in that privilege, you are physically and emotionally incapable of having empathy.
You're a very cold person. You probably don't have many friends.
OK, so if someone is calling for genocide by waving the Nazi flag, you just said right here that isn't protected speech.
You just make shit up off the top of your head, and when the inherent contradictions start to appear in your argument, suddenly you change your argument on a dime.