Here is one American tradition that isn't going to be slowed any by the coronavirus,

guno said:
q96rsrjgqfz01.jpg
Click to expand...

There's no such thing as an assault weapon...stupid fuck!


But just for shits and giggles....I have dozens of assault weapons; pencils, chopsticks, forks, knifes, hammers, powered and cordless drills, pry bars, a bat, some broomsticks … the list goes on and on.

And u have one, the comb in your nappy hair!

GettyImages-183852426-comb-56a0a8515f9b58eba4b28127.jpg
 
Last edited:
USFREEDOM911 said:
Good point, except for that little FACT that no one owns "assault weapons"; because "assault" is an action and no gun has ever assaulted anyone.
Click to expand...

And someone who kills a woman could not have committed manslaughter, because she was a woman. We can all make pointless posts making up definitions for words.

In the real world, assault rifles were named by the Germans because they were good rifles to use in military assaults. It is a rifle meant to be used in assaulting, rather than more static tactics.
 
volsrock said:
There's no such thing as an assault weapon...stupid fuck!
Click to expand...

There clearly are assault weapons. You might as well be arguing there are no such things as cars, because you do not like that we define certain things as cars.

There is a clear, legal definition of what is an assault weapon. But a general definition would be that it is an assault rifle, but without the necessity of having selective fire. And assault rifles have been defined for almost 80 years now. They have selective fire, detachable large magazines, and intermediate cartridge.

Next you will tell us that there are no such things as military rifles, because rifles cannot take the oath of enlistment.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
all the more reason to not only own them, but completely prohibit the government from having any power over them
Click to expand...

So who do you plan on using assault military tactics on?

Your friends think they do not exist, so there should be no problem with banning them. The government can ban unicorns all it wants.
 
its not treason if the government agents are the ones assaulting us first.............

contrary to your popular belief, we the people are the power and highest authority in this country, not an FBI agent or the president
 
SmarterthanYou said:
its not treason if the government agents are the ones assaulting us first.............
Click to expand...

Actually, treason is conducting a war against the government. That means it still is treason. It might be justifiable treason, but it still is treason. An example would be, I support treason against Hitler, but I do not go around claiming it is not treason.

If you are afraid of people assaulting you, wouldn't you want a more defense weapon?

And how is it the rest of the developed world is able to be free without assault weapons? If they really need them, they take them from the government. But for the most part, they do not really need them. While many under developed dictatorships have widespread assault weapons.

To subjugate the citizens with weapons, the government must distribute weapons to at least some of the citizens. That makes the guns available to the citizens. It becomes its own solution.
 
Walt said:
And someone who kills a woman could not have committed manslaughter, because she was a woman. We can all make pointless posts making up definitions for words.

In the real world, assault rifles were named by the Germans because they were good rifles to use in military assaults. It is a rifle meant to be used in assaulting, rather than more static tactics.
Click to expand...

I hope that you're aware that the Courts recognize that the use of man, in manslaughter, refers to everyone, even children and women. :palm:
 
Walt said:
Actually, treason is conducting a war against the government. That means it still is treason. It might be justifiable treason, but it still is treason. An example would be, I support treason against Hitler, but I do not go around claiming it is not treason.

If you are afraid of people assaulting you, wouldn't you want a more defense weapon?

And how is it the rest of the developed world is able to be free without assault weapons? If they really need them, they take them from the government. But for the most part, they do not really need them. While many under developed dictatorships have widespread assault weapons.

To subjugate the citizens with weapons, the government must distribute weapons to at least some of the citizens. That makes the guns available to the citizens. It becomes its own solution.
Click to expand...

All of the Founders were traitors to King George. As Benjamin Franklin was once attributed to saying "we must all hang together, or ... we shall all hang separately." Even if the attribution is incorrect, the statement itself is not.

There are solid reasons for the unalienable right of self-defense and the necessity of an armed citizenry.

3l989q.jpg
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I hope that you're aware that the Courts recognize that the use of man, in manslaughter, refers to everyone, even children and women. :palm:
Click to expand...

Which is why it is a "pointless posts making up definitions for words". Saying that an assault rifle cannot assault someone on its own also is a "pointless posts making up definitions for words".
 
Dutch Uncle said:
All of the Founders were traitors to King George.
Click to expand...

Yes.

If the likes of Timothy McVeigh win against the US, they can setup their own nation. They can call their capital McVeigh, or whatever they want. Until then, McVeigh will be a traitor to the USA.


Dutch Uncle said:
As Benjamin Franklin was once attributed to saying "we must all hang together, or ... we shall all hang separately." Even if the attribution is incorrect, the statement itself is not. There are solid reasons for the unalienable right of self-defense and the necessity of an armed citizenry.
Click to expand...

You make a good point, for a military made up of citizens, but you are not there at individual weapons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top