At Least 1 Dead in Shooting at Texas Church

Well, I guess I can understand needing to protect your home from hillbillies high on meth, or opioid-addicted trash people.

But honestly, a strong security system, kick-guards on your doors, and strong locks are all you need to prevent break-ins. Most break-ins occur when no one is home...so unless you're a hermit who stays in your house 24/7 and never leaves, the chance of your weapon deterring a robbery or break in is pretty low...In fact, having your gun in your home just gives thieves something else to steal. 200,000 guns are stolen from homes, cars, and businesses just like that. I don't understand the logic of having another thing someone can steal from your house, then use to harm someone or sell it to someone who will.

People buy guns to protect their homes and cars from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes and cars.

And while you might say that no one has ever stolen a gun from you, I would say that no one has stolen a gun from you yet. No one is infallible. People make mistakes, particularly "responsible gun owners" who made the first mistake of bringing the gun into their home for it to be stolen.

Why should I care what you think? I don't.
 
I am happy to have a trained, responsible person with a handgun around, but remember the good guy with the gun that was shot dead by the police after killing the lunatic who had the AR?

Also take note how good it was that the guy who attacked the Jewish people in New York was unable to get his hands on an AR.
 
Well, I guess I can understand needing to protect your home from hillbillies high on meth, or opioid-addicted trash people.
Bigotry.
But honestly, a strong security system, kick-guards on your doors, and strong locks are all you need to prevent break-ins.
Divisional error fallacy. A home break in is not the only crime, and is not the only threat to life, limb, or property by another.
Most break-ins occur when no one is home...so unless you're a hermit who stays in your house 24/7 and never leaves, the chance of your weapon deterring a robbery or break in is pretty low...In fact, having your gun in your home just gives thieves something else to steal.
Compositional error fallacy. Burglars do not necessarily steal a gun that might be in the home.
200,000 guns are stolen from homes, cars, and businesses just like that.
Argument from randU fallacy. You are making up numbers now.
I don't understand the logic of having another thing someone can steal from your house, then use to harm someone or sell it to someone who will.
Divisional error fallacy. Generic conclusion based on isolated case.
People buy guns to protect their homes and cars from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes and cars.
Bigotry. Not all guns criminals use are stolen.
And while you might say that no one has ever stolen a gun from you, I would say that no one has stolen a gun from you yet. No one is infallible. People make mistakes, particularly "responsible gun owners" who made the first mistake of bringing the gun into their home for it to be stolen.
Pascal's Wager fallacy. You cannot make a proof out of a speculation.
 
Why should I care what you think? I don't.

"I don't care what you think" is a cop-out; a cowardly act of running away from an argument you know you're not going to win.

Of course people like you need guns...that's the only way you feel secure. You can just use it to passively threaten anyone who dares make your argument look like the mess it is, and not the infallible principles you think it represents.

You're not entitled to your opinion, and you should give a whole metric ton of shit what others think of you, if you have any hope of persuading them to your side.
 
Well, I guess I can understand needing to protect your home from hillbillies high on meth, or opioid-addicted trash people.

But honestly, a strong security system, kick-guards on your doors, and strong locks are all you need to prevent break-ins. Most break-ins occur when no one is home...so unless you're a hermit who stays in your house 24/7 and never leaves, the chance of your weapon deterring a robbery or break in is pretty low...In fact, having your gun in your home just gives thieves something else to steal. 200,000 guns are stolen from homes, cars, and businesses just like that. I don't understand the logic of having another thing someone can steal from your house, then use to harm someone or sell it to someone who will.

People buy guns to protect their homes and cars from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes and cars.

And while you might say that no one has ever stolen a gun from you, I would say that no one has stolen a gun from you yet. No one is infallible. People make mistakes, particularly "responsible gun owners" who made the first mistake of bringing the gun into their home for it to be stolen.

Irony of all this is that one's odds of being murdered in a break in is even greater than dying from slipping in your bathtub, and the mere probability of being a victim of gun violence increases considerably by just having a gun in the house

http://www.lifeinsurancequotes.org/additional-resources/deadly-statistics/
https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-mortality-risk

The self defense "argument" supposedly justifying guns is inane, just the fact that we now have more guns out there in circulation than any other developed nation and yet still have the highest gun violence statistics of developed nations proves it is bogus, more guns haven't made anyone safer
 
Irony of all this is that one's odds of being murdered in a break in is even greater than dying from slipping in your bathtub, and the mere probability of being a victim of gun violence increases considerably by just having a gun in the house

http://www.lifeinsurancequotes.org/additional-resources/deadly-statistics/
https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-mortality-risk

The self defense "argument" supposedly justifying guns is inane, just the fact that we now have more guns out there in circulation than any other developed nation and yet still have the highest gun violence statistics of developed nations proves it is bogus, more guns haven't made anyone safer

Gun ownership is a bloody, cynical, capitalist game; buy a gun to protect your home, car, and business from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes, cars, and businesses.
 
Gun ownership is a bloody, cynical, capitalist game; buy a gun to protect your home, car, and business from criminals armed with guns they stole from homes, cars, and businesses.

Well I do agree it is capitalism on steroids, the gun manufactures has a large segment of the country convinced we are still living in the last half of the 19th Century and the "intellectual" rationale they've sold to go along with the fear mongering is that it is all about Constitutional rights
 
Well I do agree it is capitalism on steroids, the gun manufactures has a large segment of the country convinced we are still living in the last half of the 19th Century and the "intellectual" rationale they've sold to go along with the fear mongering is that it is all about Constitutional rights

Which if you subject that argument to just the slightest amount of scrutiny, dies on the vine.

That's when they come back with "I don't care what you think" or some other ham-fisted attempt to duck out of the debate.

Ultimately, even they know that guns are stupid and don't make anyone safer. At this point, they are just being contrarian about it because if they admitted guns are dumb, it would throw all their other long-held beliefs into question. And they're just too afraid to confront the reality that their conventional wisdom has been wrong all these years. I can understand people being reluctant to admit that. Who wants to admit their judgment is completely and totally fucked, anyway? Not these armchair warriors.
 
LOL!

1. Your shitty little AR-15 isn't going to stop a government armed with drones, gunships, SEALs, and nuclear warheads from doing what it wants.

2. I'm not talking about removing weapons, I'm talking about offering cash for the guns which will pit families against themselves. Throw an ungodly overpayment for guns into the equation and you'll get the kind of family separation that I support. When push comes to shove, if a family needs a few grand to pay down debt, bills, or whatever, they're going to weigh those needs vs. the gun. 9/10 the needs will win out over the gun. Then, when the holdouts die off -which they will- their guns are just surrendered to the authorities (no cash for the families then; you missed out on the buyback, you don't get a second chance.)

3. With all rights, there are limitations, and gun owners have proven there are limits to their responsibility; for instance, the fact that almost 200,000 guns are stolen from "responsible gun owners" and retailers every year. After 10 years, that's 2 million stolen guns just floating around. That's too much risk. Y'all ammosexuals have proven over and over that you cannot be trusted with the heavy responsibility of gun ownership. And if you can't be responsible for guns, then no one can.

:laugh:

1. The tyrants in England "assumed" the same thing...… a shitty little Podunk colony does not have a chance against the greatest military on planet earth.....You are presenting a FALSE PREMISE on just who controls the drones, gunships, seals, and nuclear warheads....you are making a false claim that the MILIATARY will be sided with a rouge government that has determined not to honor the founding principles of this REPUBLIC established by the people and for the people. 2. Just who do you assume is fighting you fascist assholes in stopping you from removing the firewall that is US CONSTIUTION and the STATES BILL OF RIGHTS? 3. Just who do you assume is behind the PLACING of Donald Trump as commander in Chief? Hint: its not the CLOWNS in AMERICA (cia) shadow government....its the PATRIOT leaders in the military that are draining the swamp as we speak. :bigthink:

200K weapons stolen in a nation of 365 million? That is .031%.....a lot if you are moron. LMAO Those weapons that are (wink, wink) stolen.....are stolen by the acts of criminals, not law abiding responsible citizens. So your fascist solution is to remove the weapons from honest citizens? The point was demonstrated in Texas just recently. Armed citizens are quite capable of stopping armed criminals. If only the JEWS had access to arms in NY....that knife totting CIA agent would have been stopped in his tracks without one innocent victim realized. Tis the difference between a state like Texas and a state controlled by fascist liberals.....the unarmed citizens in a gun grabbing state like NY...are nothing but sheep to get slaughtered.
 
Last edited:
Three people were shot, now imagine how many wouldn't have been shot if the perk hadn't been able to get his hands on a gun?
It was a shotgun a very common hunting gun. Nobody is going to outlaw shot guns. The gun laws that prohibited him from owning a gun didn't stop him because he was a criminal. Gun laws just stop good people. The difference in Sutherland Spring church shooting that kill 27 and the White Settlement shooting that killed 2 is the law changed after the Sutherland Springs shooting. Texas laws now allow churches to organize member into an armed security force. The White Settlement Church of Christ had an organized armed security force and a security force armed member shot the prep in 6 seconds. The change in laws that now allow members to defend themselves saved lives.
 
This incident shows that trained volunteers on the scene that can react immediately and before the police can arrived can save lives. Its also an argument for arming select teachers who want to train and volunteer to conceal carry at school. Granted not all teachers want or should conceal carry but some do. If I were a student I'd feel better about trained teacher concealed carrying over waiting for a police response while a shooter is free to kill because no one is shooting at him.
 
Three people were shot, now imagine how many wouldn't have been shot if the perk hadn't been able to get his hands on a gun?

A shotgun only holds but 3 rounds. And the intruder was shot by a Church Security Staff member- not just a church member.

The reason why Security was able to respond so quickly is because they were already suspicious of the intruder and watching this intruder's every step.

They just didn't check him for weapons when he entered the church, and he was hiding a modified shotgun in his heavy coat.

Many churches here in Texas now have armed security, often times local police officers.
 
Last edited:
A shotgun don't hold but 3 rounds. And the intruder was shot by a Church Security Staff member- not just a church member.

The reason why Security was able to respond so quickly is because they were already suspicious of the intruder and watching this intruder's every step.

Unplugged, most shotguns hold 5 rounds. Some, more.

Say what you want, but the fact remains...it was citizens who stopped further deaths in this situation. Law enforcement didn't arrive until everything was done and over-with.
 
Back
Top