And now the real circus will begin;

archives said:
Wait a minute, are you saying that Russian involvement in the 2016 election was all just a hoax? that they did it to benefit Trump was a hoax? that the Russians had extensive contacts with the Trump campaign was a hoax? what specifically was a hoax?
Click to expand...

No, the Russians meddled—like they always do. Given ‘the apparent state of things’ I’ll say it’s *likely* they meddled in Tump’s favor. That’s about as far I’ll go with it. Which could have happened for a host of reasons having nothing to to do with any conspiracy.

That the Trump/Russian Hoax was a hoax, is no longer debatable. Thanks to Horowitz. He’s not getting the credit he deserves from some righties.
 
archives said:
"Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Thursday that he will be in "total coordination with the White House counsel" as the impeachment into President Donald Trump presses forward."

"During an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News, the Majority Leader said that "everything" he does*"during this, I'm coordinating with the White House counsel. There will be no difference between the president's position and our position as to how to handle this, to the extent that we can."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ion-white-house-impeachment-trial/4416518002/

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in a jury trial isn't the jury suppose to be impartial till at least the proceedings begin? And I certainly know that members of the jury, especially the leader, is not suppose to work hand and hand with the defendants attorneys, well, that was the way cases were done prior to the Trump era

(And before the lemmings start with the "but but but what about the House," nothing was being litigated in the House, they were following the House rules set by the prior GOP House)

The Trumpkin's are all hoping they get to call all the witnesses Hannity wants called, ain't happening, then the whole facade will really turn into a circus with the Democrats demanding all of Trump's White House lackeys and perhaps Trump himself. Mitch wants this in and done in two weeks
Click to expand...

aicywvsk8gd31.jpg
 
christiefan915 said:
I stand by my opinion that if a person hasn't done anything wrong, he can't be caught in a perjury trap. And a process crime is still a crime. Capone was caught for a process crime.
Click to expand...

Of course you do; and you are just as wrong and as stupid as the last time you blurted that out. :rolleyes:
 
archives said:
Wait a minute, are you saying that Russian involvement in the 2016 election was all just a hoax? that they did it to benefit Trump was a hoax? that the Russians had extensive contacts with the Trump campaign was a hoax? what specifically was a hoax?
Click to expand...

No, yes, and yes.
 
Darth Omar said:
They were threatening his kid.

What would you do?
Click to expand...

From today's news, nothing about the son. And I don't understand your comment. What was the son being threatened about and how did Flynn pleading guilty save him? If the son did something illegal he should be charged.

Washington (CNN)A federal judge who will sentence Michael Flynn issued a blanket rebuke of conspiracy theories on Monday about the former Trump national security adviser that have festered over the last two years.

"The Court summarily disposes of Mr. Flynn's arguments that the FBI conducted an ambush interview for the purpose of trapping him into making false statements and that the government pressured him to enter a guilty plea. The record proves otherwise," Sullivan wrote on Monday.

"Regardless of Mr. Flynn's new theories, he pled guilty twice to the crime, and he fails to demonstrate that the disclosure of the requested information would have impacted his decision to plead guilty," Sullivan added. The FBI didn't entrap Flynn when he lied to them in the early days of the Trump administration, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court in DC said in a 92-page opinion."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/16/politics/michael-flynn-sentencing/index.html
 
christiefan915 said:
Good lord. If he didn't need it, it wouldn't be there. Why is it so hard for you to accept that he uses a teleprompter just like everyone who came before him did? What are you trying to prove?
Click to expand...

The teleprompter is always there. He just doesn't use it. The images you show are photoshopped. Teleprompters don't look like that. At most he might use it like one would use notes for a speech. He doesn't use the teleprompter word for word by any means.
 
christiefan915 said:
From today's news, nothing about the son. And I don't understand your comment. What was the son being threatened about and how did Flynn pleading guilty save him? If the son did something illegal he should be charged.

Washington (CNN)A federal judge who will sentence Michael Flynn issued a blanket rebuke of conspiracy theories on Monday about the former Trump national security adviser that have festered over the last two years.

"The Court summarily disposes of Mr. Flynn's arguments that the FBI conducted an ambush interview for the purpose of trapping him into making false statements and that the government pressured him to enter a guilty plea. The record proves otherwise," Sullivan wrote on Monday.

"Regardless of Mr. Flynn's new theories, he pled guilty twice to the crime, and he fails to demonstrate that the disclosure of the requested information would have impacted his decision to plead guilty," Sullivan added. The FBI didn't entrap Flynn when he lied to them in the early days of the Trump administration, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court in DC said in a 92-page opinion."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/16/politics/michael-flynn-sentencing/index.html
Click to expand...

But we now know, that people high up in the FBI knew, that the Russian investigation was being propped up by a rubbish Dossier at the time they got Flynn for lying to investigators.

How does anyone even defend this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top