Superfreak
Verified User
Which day? 37 this past week according to those who count such things.
LMAO... according to biased hacks who lie about 'lies'.
Which day? 37 this past week according to those who count such things.
The transcript is not a summary. It is a transcript. It does not demonstrate any extortion.
When you lie as much as Trump does no one has to rely on one fact checker to point out Trump's lies:
Oxymoron is 2 contradictory words, usually an adjective followed by a noun:
Mensa member Trumpet
CNN fact checker
jumbo shrimp
original copy
paid volunteer
etc.......
Sure as shit not, dumbfuck. A transcript records the original content. A summary does not. There were several ellipses in the summary which means there were missing words or phrases. Vindman filled some of those in.
The extortion is obvious except to you illiterate morons. The extortion was then corroborated by Taylor, Vindman and others.
So, dumbshit, a summary, not a transcript.
Moron.
Then Nancy has all she needs to vote articles of impeachment.
Remember you don’t need a crime to impeach. Y’all read the federalist papers and everything
Fucking vote already. Let’s get it on pussy. I want you to do it
The clock is running out on you
What is obvious is that you are going to look like an absolute, complete and utter moron when this ends with a massive NOTHING burger. But ass clowns like you never seem to be able to ear enough crow or look stupid enough. So you just keep doubling down on stupid and eating ever greater amounts of crow. Of which, a large helping is soon to be on its way to you.![]()
She doesn't have all she needs for the mental midgets like you or those in the Senate.
Relax, dumbshit. Things are moving along.
Glad that at least you're admitting that a criminal offense is not necessary for impeachment. That's a first step.
I don't have a vote, cunt. Nor is my clock running out on me.
Moron.
![]()
Refute what I posted, cunt.
You can't, can your, you flaccid little prick.
Loser.
![]()
the clock is running out on your democrat party
It would seem that if what they have is so open and shut, she wouldn't need to investigate, but hey have fun with it
the clock is running out on your democrat party
It would seem that if what they have is so open and shut, she wouldn't need to investigate, but hey have fun with it
Refute what I posted, cunt.
You can't, can your, you flaccid little prick.
Loser.
CNN fact checker aghast at Trump’s Ukraine scandal lies: ‘Dishonest about every component of the story’
![]()
Published
1 min ago on
October 30, 2019
By
Brad Reed
![]()
[FONT=&]CNN fact checker Daniel Dale has found himself to be in awe of President Donald Trump’s dishonesty when discussing the Ukraine scandal.
[FONT=&]In a lengthy new piece posted at CNN, Dale documents how Trump has made 96 false claims in the last week — including a whopping 53 on Monday alone.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“It’s hard to explain just how comprehensively Trump is lying about the Ukraine scandal,”
. “He’s being dishonest about basically every individual component of the story.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Getting into specifics, Dale shows that Trump has relentlessly lied about his own actions and the actions of other government officials.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“He falsely claimed he had released an exact transcript of his July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky,” Dale writes. “He falsely claimed he did not ask Zelensky for anything on the call. He falsely claimed people aren’t talking about the call anymore. He falsely claimed the whistleblower complaint about the call was ‘totally wrong.’ He falsely claimed the whistleblower alleged he had made seven or eight mentions of a ‘quid pro quo.’ He falsely claimed the whistleblower has vanished. He falsely claimed Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff was the whistleblower’s source.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/cn...dishonest-about-every-component-of-the-story/[/FONT]
[/FONT]
Apparently the Trumperoos have got a problem with the Truth.
the clock is running out on your democrat party
It would seem that if what they have is so open and shut, she wouldn't need to investigate, but hey have fun with it
Office of the Fact Checker at FOX NEWS
![]()
![]()
You seem to have trouble with this.Sure as shit not, dumbfuck.
And that's what it did.A transcript records the original content.
What summary?A summary does not.
What summary?There were several ellipses in the summary
None.which means there were missing words or phrases.
Vindman is a corrupt official associated with Biden and the fake Russian dossier. So is Taylor. You can't use them as a reference.Vindman filled some of those in.
None.The extortion is obvious except to you illiterate morons.
You can list all the corrupt officials and double agents you want. It doesn't change anything.The extortion was then corroborated by Taylor, Vindman and others.
What summary?So, dumbshit, a summary, not a transcript.
Refute what I posted, cunt.
You can't, can your, you flaccid little prick.
Loser.
![]()