DEAD MEN DON’T NEED IMPEACHMENT. Swamp in Panic: Trump In Danger.

Originally Posted by anatta
what he actually did was show that foreign aid can be contingent on circumstances


STFU until you are willing to be honest, you piece of cow dung.

Circumstances= "attack my political rival to help me get reelected" Until you can manage to spit these words out instead of your vague euphemism,
"circumstance" you are a fucking degenerate clown who should be tried and executed as a fully committed traitor.

How do you people fucking sleep at night knowing you have no integrity at all? How do you rationalize it? When you are on your death bed won't you
look back and say, geez I lived a fucking lie and tried all my life to spread lies and make the world a darker place with misinformed people.

I couldn't do that. I have to be good.
lol.. I noticed you pulled a Schiff move here with the quote
"attack my political rival to help me get reelected" -never ever said. Why do Dems have to make shit up for their cases?
 
There’s a real problem with your appeal to whataboutism.

Too many voters are fair minded. Even if they don’t care for Trump. Since it gives the appearance Trump is being selectively singled out [well, because he is] for *allegedly* doing something Hillary actually did AND got away with—they are going to say WTF?

fuck off Russian asset
 
lol.. I noticed you pulled a Schiff move here with the quote
"attack my political rival to help me get reelected" -never ever said. Why do Dems have to make shit up for their cases?

who cares what your evil ass asserts


you have lied about this nation every time you post
 
oh OK. "DC politicians are the model of public service and integrity" - not even you can believe that!

the American people picked them


republicans pick them because republicans hate America


just ask them


they all sound like you


you assertion is Americans are TOO STUPID to run this nation


you prefer the Russian deep state and Putin types
 
There’s a real problem with your appeal to whataboutism.

Too many voters are fair minded. Even if they don’t care for Trump. Since it gives the appearance Trump is being selectively singled out [well, because he is] for *allegedly* doing something Hillary actually did AND got away with—they are going to say WTF?

The only people who think that way are Trumpcucks. Fair people who care about the country, including Conservatives, will accept that Trump should be impeached and removed. At most, they'll say after Trump is prosecuted, Hillary should be next.

While I don't think we'll find anything, I'd be fine with an investigation into Hillary too. Maybe she can have a cell next to Trump.
 
do you still want this nation separated by race ?????

No, I never said that. What I said is that a white ethnostate should be carved out of America.

WHEN will you renounce your racism?

What's your definition of racism?

It is antithetical to everything in the Democratic stance

Good thing I'm not a Democrat.

Economically speaking, I am a Social Democrat, but I have no loyalty to the DNC or the RNC. A plague on both their houses.
 
The only people who think that way are Trumpcucks. Fair people who care about the country, including Conservatives, will accept that Trump should be impeached and removed. At most, they'll say after Trump is prosecuted, Hillary should be next.

While I don't think we'll find anything, I'd be fine with an investigation into Hillary too. Maybe she can have a cell next to Trump.

You're not welcome in my threads again, fuck off!!
 
Consider the context. He's referring to Trump's phone call in which he withheld foreign aid until Ukraine agreed to do him a personal favor. And instead of going through congress, he made the request himself, and referred Zelensky to his personal lawyer.

Sure, countries do withhold aid sometimes. There have been times that we withheld aid until a country agreed to enforce human rights. But we're not talking about that. We're talking about a president withholding aid in order to get dirt on a political opponent and then trying to cover it up.

Seriously, do you not think Trump knew this was illegal? Why do you think he tried to cover it up by hiding the recording?
not thru "Congress " thru State Dept. get your facts right for starters.
Trump can't trust the State Dept. It's a den of leftover Clintonistas and Obamatrons
( Why Tillerson tried to clear it out to begin with) Ukraine had been trying to give US prosecutors info
and they refused to take it.. so start here why he employed Rudy.

We withhold aid not just for human rights ( although thankfully that concept is all but dead) but because
we don't like their government. or their actions.

There was no holding it up on a quid - a contingency (like getting rid of corruption, or sounding out Zelensky's views) is right and proper.

Finally this house of card you attempt to construct falls apart because ZELENSKY NEVER KNEW THE AID WAS HELD UP
and you can't pressure someone who doesn't know they are being pressured (ex.)
 
the American people picked them


republicans pick them because republicans hate America


just ask them


they all sound like you


you assertion is Americans are TOO STUPID to run this nation


you prefer the Russian deep state and Putin types

Fuck off cunt, you're not welcome in any of my threads.
 

For those too lazy to click, or who get the paywall, from the link:

"WASHINGTON—A top White House official for the first time linked President Trump’s decision to hold up aid to Ukraine to his desire for Kyiv to probe a Democratic National Committee server related to the 2016 election, then hours later issued a statement contradicting his own remarks.

"The initial comments at a White House briefing by acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney caused alarm among senior White House aides and the president’s legal team. Mr. Trump has repeatedly denied there was any quid pro quo related to the aid. Late Thursday afternoon, Mr. Mulvaney issued a statement, reviewed by Mr. Trump, reversing his remarks and saying there was no connection.

"In his briefing with reporters earlier Thursday, Mr. Mulvaney said that Mr. Trump’s concerns about corruption in Ukraine—including an unfounded suspicion expressed by the president that a hacked DNC server has since been hidden in Ukraine—were partly responsible for Mr. Trump’s order to withhold nearly $400 million in aid to Ukraine in July."
 
lol.. I noticed you pulled a Schiff move here with the quote
"attack my political rival to help me get reelected" -never ever said. Why do Dems have to make shit up for their cases?

They have to read that part into it lol.

Just one of the myriad problems with their ‘case’ and just one of the reasons it will never be voted on.
 
For those too lazy to click, or who get the paywall, from the link:

"WASHINGTON—A top White House official for the first time linked President Trump’s decision to hold up aid to Ukraine to his desire for Kyiv to probe a Democratic National Committee server related to the 2016 election, then hours later issued a statement contradicting his own remarks.

"The initial comments at a White House briefing by acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney caused alarm among senior White House aides and the president’s legal team. Mr. Trump has repeatedly denied there was any quid pro quo related to the aid. Late Thursday afternoon, Mr. Mulvaney issued a statement, reviewed by Mr. Trump, reversing his remarks and saying there was no connection.

"In his briefing with reporters earlier Thursday, Mr. Mulvaney said that Mr. Trump’s concerns about corruption in Ukraine—including an unfounded suspicion expressed by the president that a hacked DNC server has since been hidden in Ukraine—were partly responsible for Mr. Trump’s order to withhold nearly $400 million in aid to Ukraine in July."

Well, where IS the damned server lol?
 
Poor H. Moron, can't take it when his bogus "facts" are exposed. Like his masters Boris and Donnie, he must be surrounded at all times by yes-men. Melt, Havana, melt! :laugh:

T2g0nsy.jpg
 
Back
Top