Finally

T

theMAJORITY

MAJORITYrules-sorry
Fox is doing a good and true story on Sara Palin. The whole life story (didn't talk much about the cop thing though--but I think she is on the up and up--we will see). What a contrast to the butchering the rest, or most of the media has been doing---a media that won't tell us anything about Obama--ya have to read his books.

Ya ever wonder about that? Why that is? Ya have to read HIS books?

If you folks can't see what an amazing person Palin is, I don't think your American.

She is the eptome of what a free person is capable of (so is Obama).

Why is it--as soon as a black man, and a white woman get to such levels--the racial tension and gender tension rise to crazy levels? I don't have a problem with race or gender--it is the caractor I look for. Who is racist--who are the gender bashers? Palin should be a poster child for what women can do--all over the world. Obama also (I just don't like his caractor)--for women all over the world--hehe. I think there is plenty of shame to go around, probably more than blame.
 
Last edited:
In todays world anyone who gets into politics, especially on a national level, is going to be subject to a harsh treatment by the media.

Obama has not come out unscathed. There have been plenty of stories about his minister, his association (such that it was) with a domestic terrorist, and other tidbits for the gossipmongers.

Majority, I have a real problem with you deciding who is and isn't "an American".

The fact that I demand more of our politicians than they have been willing to give is not unpatriotic. In fact, I would submit that it is MORE patriotic.

And just because people do not agree on politics does not make one better or worse, more american or less american, or more intelligent or less intelligent. It just means they have different priorities on issues.
 
Solitary said:
And just because people do not agree on politics does not make one better or worse, more american or less american, or more intelligent or less intelligent. It just means they have different priorities on issues.
Click to expand...
Surely you are lacking in judgement with this statement. Any disagreement with either side is either signs of cognitive disfunction ("judgement in politicians is null and void") or unAmur'kin.

Simple fact is you are either one or the other. Pick a side and choose: patriotism or intelligence. You cannot have both.
 
theMAJORITY said:
see folks--that is how a liberial does it. They eliminate all discussion--and assume a take over.
Click to expand...

You must be a commie. You just claimed that anyone that fails to share your idiotic assumptions and idolization of Palin is unAmerican.. Clearly it was an attempt to eliminate discussion.
 
In todays world anyone who gets into politics, especially on a national level, is going to be subject to a harsh treatment by the media.

(agreed--Palin can take it)

Obama has not come out unscathed. There have been plenty of stories about his minister, his association (such that it was) with a domestic terrorist, and other tidbits for the gossipmongers.

(We never would have heard of American hater Wright, if it were not for consertative talk radio, or any other of his thug friends)

Majority, I have a real problem with you deciding who is and isn't "an American".

(Socialism is not American. America is where people go to be more free, and follow their dreams---because of their opressive nations, whos people who are still stuck there, love Obama.--I am sorry if anybody gets offended. I don't have a problem offending anybody who wants to change the liberty theme of America--It is my duty to speak up to save this human sanctuary)


The fact that I demand more of our politicians than they have been willing to give is not unpatriotic. In fact, I would submit that it is MORE patriotic.

(agreed--in fact-their actions can be called unpatriotic--may even treasonous)

And just because people do not agree on politics does not make one better or worse, more american or less american, or more intelligent or less intelligent. It just means they have different priorities on issues.


(not agreed---Americas sovernty means more that that to me---socialism is a constant fight, and lots of our people died fighting the philosophies Obama supports)
 
RStringfield said:
You must be a commie. You just claimed that anyone that fails to share your idiotic assumptions and idolization of Palin is unAmerican.. Clearly it was an attempt to eliminate discussion.
Click to expand...

That is where you get twisted. I knew somebody was going to say that. Like Palin--all I have to do is get to fundementals to see through this type of BS.

The difference is I fight for peoples freedom, so they can do amazing things, and develope a meaning of life for themselfs. You are saying I am a socialist commie, because I believe people need to defend themselfs agsinst it. Like Palin--I use the free will of people to fight what you claim I am. Other forms of government use anything from brain washing media and universities, to militant action.

Corner a Baracuda that wants to be free--and see what you get.

It is human nature--in fact all animal nature to be free. Go ahead--take it away if you can. It has been done- and reversed many times before. If Americans did not want to be free--Palin would not be busting your azzes---lol
 
Last edited:
theMAJORITY said:
In todays world anyone who gets into politics, especially on a national level, is going to be subject to a harsh treatment by the media.

(agreed--Palin can take it)

Obama has not come out unscathed. There have been plenty of stories about his minister, his association (such that it was) with a domestic terrorist, and other tidbits for the gossipmongers.

(We never would have heard of American hater Wright, if it were not for consertative talk radio, or any other of his thug friends)

Majority, I have a real problem with you deciding who is and isn't "an American".

(Socialism is not American. America is where people go to be more free, and follow their dreams---because of their opressive nations, whos people who are still stuck there, love Obama.--I am sorry if anybody gets offended. I don't have a problem offending anybody who wants to change the liberty theme of America--It is my duty to speak up to save this human sanctuary)


The fact that I demand more of our politicians than they have been willing to give is not unpatriotic. In fact, I would submit that it is MORE patriotic.

(agreed--in fact-their actions can be called unpatriotic--may even treasonous)

And just because people do not agree on politics does not make one better or worse, more american or less american, or more intelligent or less intelligent. It just means they have different priorities on issues.


(not agreed---Americas sovernty means more that that to me---socialism is a constant fight, and lots of our people died fighting the philosophies Obama supports)
Click to expand...

And one of the biggest threats to our personal freedoms was a piece of legislation by a republican. The Patriot Act is what you should be screaming against. It is more dangerous than higher taxes, national healthcare, or any of the other programs being pressed by the Dems. The PA goes against the very nature of freedom. It ASSUMES guilt based on zero evidence.

And to try and decide, based solely on your own views, who is or isn't an american, is truly a biased concept. That some people believe that the government should care for its poor and handicapped is not unamerican. That some believe that the government should regulate critical businesses is not unamerican.

To claim those who disagree with you are unamerican is what is unamerican.
 
theMAJORITY said:
That is where you get twisted. I knew somebody was going to say that. Like Plain--all I have to do is get to fundementals to see through this type of BS.

The difference is I fight for peoples freedom, so they can do amazing things, and develope a meaning of life for themselfs. You are saying I am a socialist commie, because I believe people need to defend themselfs agsinst it. Like Palin--I use the free will of people to fight what you claim I am. Other forms of government use anything from brain washing media and universities, to militant action.

Corner a Baracuda that wants to be free--and see what you get.

It is human nature--in fact all animal nature to be free. Go ahead--take it away if you can. It has been done- and reversed many times before. If Americans did not want to be free--Palin would not be busting your azzes---lol
Click to expand...

No, retard... you said...

see folks--that is how a liberial does it. They eliminate all discussion--and assume a take over.
Click to expand...

But you attempted to eliminate discussion by casting anyone who disagrees with your delusions concerning Palin as unAmerican. Therefore you must be a librul, i.e., a commie.
 
theMAJORITY said:
I never in my life said "discussion closed". Continious discussion over non factual bull shit (like the media Palin rape) is a different story though. It is just annoying.
Click to expand...

No, you have never said "discussion closed". But the condescending tone and the stereotypical garbage in your posts is worse. Talking about liberals talking over bean sprouts, saying that environmentalists never leave the city, ect ect ect, is not only annoying, it is insulting to anyone who isn't reading to goose-step into line with the rest of the uniformed republicans.
 
Solitary said:
And one of the biggest threats to our personal freedoms was a piece of legislation by a republican. The Patriot Act is what you should be screaming against. It is more dangerous than higher taxes, national healthcare, or any of the other programs being pressed by the Dems. The PA goes against the very nature of freedom. It ASSUMES guilt based on zero evidence.
Click to expand...

I agree--that is a privacy issue, and very much direclty against our individual liberties. I have talked with customers in the middle east, and I bet I am being recorded. I have a lot of engines over there. mostly in Qatar and the UAE. There is electornic equiptment I can buy to see for sure--and I am thinking of doing it. I was raised by parents that did not search my room. They have respect for privacy--(Dad with parents from Poland, and my mother is from canada---what does that tell you aboput how much Americans charish privacy?--Is there a reason why my grand parents from Poland instilled privacy morals in my dad?--you bet there is.)

Now--the argument for it is "If you don't have anything to hide, you don't have anything to worry about". lets get back to fundementals again--to see through this STUPID COMMIE BS.

The US constitution was not developed for people that had something to hide!!
 
Last edited:
RStringfield said:
No, retard... you said...



But you attempted to eliminate discussion by casting anyone who disagrees with your delusions concerning Palin as unAmerican. Therefore you must be a librul, i.e., a commie.
Click to expand...

No--it is my opinion that anybody that does not Palin is unAmerican. I am not trying to pass leglislation to punish them. Free people will punish them enough by simply protecting their liberities that every human desires. When the people of USA, who don't want to change the liberity theme of USA, want to end the discussion--you will know it. :)
 
Last edited:
I don't know why I bother with imbeciles like yourself. Was usc passing legislation to punish you?

Besides, you have shown conclusively you're a communist with your support of government spying on citizens. You have no clue what the constitution is about.
 
Solitary said:
No, you have never said "discussion closed". But the condescending tone and the stereotypical garbage in your posts is worse. Talking about liberals talking over bean sprouts, saying that environmentalists never leave the city, ect ect ect, is not only annoying, it is insulting to anyone who isn't reading to goose-step into line with the rest of the uniformed republicans.
Click to expand...

Just trying to get a point across--Do you liberials have any idea how thick you morons are? There--that ought to piss you off. Good. Freedom of speach does not mean polite speach--or we would not need freedom of speach (which, I guess--you can't deal with). If you can't take the accusation--don't be an accomplice to the crime.
 
RStringfield said:
I don't know why I bother with imbeciles like yourself. Was usc passing legislation to punish you?

Besides, you have shown conclusively you're a communist with your support of government spying on citizens. You have no clue what the constitution is about.
Click to expand...

No quote--for a reason. If your talking to me---your out of your mind. I never ever supported the patriot act. ever. You will not find anything I said that proves me wrong. Go ahead--show me a quote this time.

To many accronyms USC?
 
Last edited:
theMAJORITY said:
Now--the argument for it is "If you don't have anything to hide, you don't have anything to worry about". lets get back to fundementals again--to see through this STUPID COMMIE BS.

The US constitution was not developed for people that had something to hide!!
Click to expand...

Maybe, I am just failing to understand your incoherent use of the language. Is the text in red an argument you support or are you talking to yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top