Ann Coulter Asks Why Trump Won’t Be Charged For Employing Undocumented Workers

So because trump & others didn't hire them, themselves they are not guilty for allowing the practice..

There you go again with the presumptuous bullshit. How do you know that was an allowed practice asshat? You lying lefties never seem to care about having facts as long as you can spread your bullshit, hyperbole and innuendo.
 
Now explain the part about undocumented workers, snowflake.

DUMB!

He didn't hire them you dumbass; read the fucking article YOU posted. It was a CONTRACTOR hired by his firm. This is why it is impossible to argue with dumb, low IQ leftists; you have to EDUCATE them about the REAL world before they can even begin to have the slightest clue of what they are emotionally whining about.
 
He didn't hire them you dumbass; read the fucking article YOU posted. It was a CONTRACTOR hired by his firm. This is why it is impossible to argue with dumb, low IQ leftists; you have to EDUCATE them about the REAL world before they can even begin to have the slightest clue of what they are emotionally whining about.

Looks like I pushed a button. ;)
 
Coulter is not a conservative. She is a mixed bag at best, espousing both conservative and liberal ideals. Nowadays, she seems to espouse more liberal ideals than conservative ideals.
 
She is a famous conservative. There is no doubt.
This is what they did earlier with the David brooks thread. They say he isn't a conservative.
They both are, they just failed the Trump purity test.

Nope. Neither of them are.

Brooks has always been a liberal.

Coulter has always been a mixed bag. She's espoused some conservative ideas, but she's espoused liberal ideas too.
 
Yep..... They changed the meaning & those that don't follow get the boot, the Neo-GOP believing they are now the ones making the rules & qualifications, disqualify them.......

The meanings have not changed.

A Liberal has always been one who "aims to liberally apply laws/policies" and a Conservative has always been one who "aims to preserve".
 
What virtues do you believe you are defending? Are you telling me you are a virtuous person? How so?

I am only interested in a President who believes in the free market, does not care what the media or the Party of the Jackass says and believes in American greatness. I haven't seen a President since Carter that I could say was virtuous. And Carter was a disaster for the most part.

I'll take that as a no. What has been the point of having a conservative movement if it won't even stand-up for basic virtues?
 
I'll take that as a no. What has been the point of having a conservative movement if it won't even stand-up for basic virtues?

Okay let's try again; I know you want to avoid being honest and obtuse when it comes to answering questions, but try to be honest. What virtues do you believe you are defending? Are you telling me you are a virtuous person? How so?
 
If he knew, fine him.
Fines can work as a disincentive.. They are hiring them for economic reasons..

This can be helpful but now many are coming here to get asylum, not just a job...

Our laws/legal system needs to be fixed & there is international laws how is that going to be fixed??
 
Okay let's try again; I know you want to avoid being honest and obtuse when it comes to answering questions, but try to be honest. What virtues do you believe you are defending? Are you telling me you are a virtuous person? How so?

Honesty? Fidelity? Decency?

I think it should be a requirement that GOP candidates put forth some effort toward possessing these traits in order to be considered for nomination. At the very least, it helps reduce the likelihood of scandals.
 
Honesty? Fidelity? Decency?

I think it should be a requirement that GOP candidates put forth some effort toward possessing these traits in order to be considered for nomination. At the very least, it helps reduce the likelihood of scandals.

So YOUR qualification to be president must include proof of fidelity, honesty and decency? How does one prove that. Do you get a little certificate from the "honorable" society?

Are you telling me you are a virtuous person? How so? Prove it.
 
Fines can work as a disincentive.. They are hiring them for economic reasons..

This can be helpful but now many are coming here to get asylum, not just a job...

Our laws/legal system needs to be fixed & there is international laws how is that going to be fixed??

Asylum should be eliminated, period. There is no reason to allow these "asylum seekers" to come here over those who go through the legal channels.
Screw international laws, this is the United States of America, not some refugee camp where anyone can come here and waltz right through our borders
and claim some bullshit story for asylum. They can wait in line, they are no better than those who wish to come here legally through immigration.
And they can wait outside our borders, if they come in illegally, they should lose any chance of becoming American citizens. Arrest and deport lawbreakers.
 
Asylum should be eliminated, period. There is no reason to allow these "asylum seekers" to come here over those who go through the legal channels.
Screw international laws, this is the United States of America, not some refugee camp where anyone can come here and waltz right through our borders
and claim some bullshit story for asylum. They can wait in line, they are no better than those who wish to come here legally through immigration.
And they can wait outside our borders, if they come in illegally, they should lose any chance of becoming American citizens. Arrest and deport lawbreakers.
I honestly don't understand the laws related to this, what I do understand though is they mean what the ppl enforcing them say it means-but that is another thread..

There are laws that congress could change- (gop didn't act when they had all three branches either) but they don't want to. They did want to before but IMHO it is just to despite trump-a horrible reason but such is politics..

How long will it be before we have over a million ppl from all over the world sitting on our welcome mat in Mexico??

There is probably 2-3 billion ppl that could easily qualify & another billion or so that could actually afford to travel to Mexico w/ a hard luck story to tell~many are hardly any different than that common to many Americans & folks around the world......
 
I honestly don't understand the laws related to this, what I do understand though is they mean what the ppl enforcing them say it means-but that is another thread..

There are laws that congress could change- (gop didn't act when they had all three branches either) but they don't want to. They did want to before but IMHO it is just to despite trump-a horrible reason but such is politics..

How long will it be before we have over a million ppl from all over the world sitting on our welcome mat in Mexico??

There is probably 2-3 billion ppl that could easily qualify & another billion or so that could actually afford to travel to Mexico w/ a hard luck story to tell~many are hardly any different than that common to many Americans & folks around the world......

It's not as easy to become citizens through immigration as you think. But it's much easier to come here through amnesty, and that's what pisses me off.
There should be no amnesty whatsoever. Everyone wanting to come here should wait in their own country until they're called. They should be allowed to
study here and then pass the tests, then move anywhere they choose, learn our culture and fly our flag. They are Americans now.
 
It's not as easy to become citizens through immigration as you think. But it's much easier to come here through amnesty, and that's what pisses me off.
There should be no amnesty whatsoever. Everyone wanting to come here should wait in their own country until they're called. They should be allowed to
study here and then pass the tests, then move anywhere they choose, learn our culture and fly our flag. They are Americans now.

No one is even talking about addressing it..........
 
Asylum should be eliminated, period. There is no reason to allow these "asylum seekers" to come here over those who go through the legal channels.
Screw international laws, this is the United States of America, not some refugee camp where anyone can come here and waltz right through our borders
and claim some bullshit story for asylum. They can wait in line, they are no better than those who wish to come here legally through immigration.
And they can wait outside our borders, if they come in illegally, they should lose any chance of becoming American citizens. Arrest and deport lawbreakers.

Of course there are very good reasons asylum seekers should be put at the head of the line. First, there is no line. Asylum seekers have a singular case and it is predicated on their and their families safety in their home. They should be judged on that only. The basis of asylum is they are in immediate danger at home.
We need to let a lot of immigrants in right now. We need the workers. We are not repopulating the US, Our birth rate is down. Immigrant labor has always been a spur to the economy.
 
Of course there are very good reasons asylum seekers should be put at the head of the line. First, there is no line. Asylum seekers have a singular case and it is predicated on their and their families safety in their home. They should be judged on that only. The basis of asylum is they are in immediate danger at home.
We need to let a lot of immigrants in right now. We need the workers. We are not repopulating the US, Our birth rate is down. Immigrant labor has always been a spur to the economy.

No, they shouldn't, and there's no good reason they should. They are no better than those who go through immigration. They can wait their turn at home.
 
Back
Top