The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born

I don't know what you're speaking of...thought it was about phonies.

He was talking about Christian phonies~ your reply appears an avoidance & perhaps an attack?? `"phoniness comes from mainly non-believers"

You posted a gif earlier of benny hinn, & you know there are many charlatans in the flock..:dunno:
 
:palm: I can't believe you think this article is about telling Illegals how to break the law.

She said undocumented immigrants have legal rights and that's a fact, so how is telling them about their legal rights breaking the law?

She said “The President’s action makes no distinction between a status violation and committing a serious crime.” And that's true.

Judge decided than about 2,000 of them are to be deported...go catch up on the news.
 
He was talking about Christian phonies~ your reply appears an avoidance & perhaps an attack?? `"phoniness comes from mainly non-believers"

You posted a gif earlier of benny hinn, & you know there are many charlatans in the flock..:dunno:

I've al;ready acknowledged that. False teachers and prophets are everywhere.
 
Judge decided than about 2,000 of them are to be deported...go catch up on the news.

If they do not qualify for refugee status under current law, the judge made the right call and I do not have a problem with it.

They still did not commit any crime for applying for refugee status. Which was your claim when you called them "illegals". It is not a crime to do so. My grandmother and aunt applied for refugee status in the early 1960s and were denied under the laws at that time. They were not criminals for seeking asylum.
 
If they do not qualify for refugee status under current law, the judge made the right call and I do not have a problem with it.

They still did not commit any crime for applying for refugee status. Which was your claim when you called them "illegals". It is not a crime to do so. My grandmother and aunt applied for refugee status in the early 1960s and were denied under the laws at that time. They were not criminals for seeking asylum.

I'm just speaking of the ones who broke the law.
 
Why do you think it was lefties who didn't want the big cross, rather than simply people who think church and state should be separate?
chances are it was leftists who are consumed with not just separation of church and state but absolutely
no ALLOWANCE of religion on public property.

We know the history of these groups ( satanists etc.) and if you read post 182 that hostility is directly from the left, and just this year alone
 
Is there some secret way to type ‘inner city’ and not get labeled a racist lol?
They kicked God out of public schools and they became godless, no?

Well, you all (religion-loving Reichwingers) love to refer to the 50s and before as a time when America was godly and holy and then the libruls ruined it all starting in the 60s. But even back then we were taught actual science and not that stupid creationism nonsense. Your personal religion was personal, not public. And our parents took us to church and Sunday school and didn't expect that the public school system would teach us to be whatever religion our parents were. In fact, they muttered a LOT about how they didn't want Jewish and Catholic stuff (i.e. prayers and religious days) in public school. They were right. That stuff belongs in the family home and not in public school. You want god in school, send your kids to a religious school.
 
Then let government stay out of the church's business. That what the founders were
getting away from.....religion dictated by the rulers...most particular The Church of England
where a King would be head of the church and order the citizens to only belong to THAT church.
right. "separation Church and state" have become absolute to the point any region in the public square drives the religion haters nuts.

The idea of church and state being separate is no state religion, and no funding of religion by the state.

It does not include banning individual expression of religion by the public -that is a violation of
the individual's right to practice as they see fit (religious liberties)
 
I think there are a few here..

& something we should all keep in mind:
but you do have a right to express your beliefs, even in a public square or school -
so long as the school/public official does not endorse any religion
 
Then let government stay out of the church's business. That what the founders were
getting away from.....religion dictated by the rulers...most particular The Church of England
where a King would be head of the church and order the citizens to only belong to THAT church.

WTF. You want GOVERNMENT to stay out of your business, while your fondest desire is to insert your corrupted Biblical crap into the very foundation of our legal and government system? The Founders knew your kind 250+ years ago, from hundreds of years of experience. They wanted to keep YOU -- and all religionists -- out of our government. They wanted to give you the freedom to worship worms, fairies, sky daddies, tiddlywinks, sausage, or whatever floats your boat -- and keep you away from the rest of us and our cherished secular government.
 
Back
Top