Biden leads trump 13 Points Nationally

[bhaktajan]

What an idiot you are, if you think that's *anything* close to that nasty POS pig in the WH has done -- and bragged about -- for decades. But then, I could have just stopped with "what an idiot you are" and this post would be just as accurate.

Yes Sir!

He's still got a ways to go to top Barney's Frankness...

The One Thing No One Is Mentioning In Their Barney Frank Tributes: The Prostitutes
Nov. 29, 2011,

Representative Barney Frank announced that he wouldn't seek re-election next year. And the news wires are filling with little tributes and remembrances of his 30 year career. But there is one notable even that isn't mentioned in most of them.
Reuters didn't mention it. The New York Times didn't bring it up. The Guardian didn't note it either.

The Washington Post got to it in the 17th paragraph.

In 1989 it was discovered that Barney Frank's boyfriend, Stephen Gobie, whom Frank had once hired as a male prostitute, was running a male-brothel out of the Congressman's home. Frank claimed he did not know about the prostitution ring in his home, but he did use the power of his office to "fix" 33 tickets for Gobie. And he knowingly wrote a misleading letter to Gobie's probation officer in Virginia. Frank received a "reprimand" for fixing the tickets. Gobie maintained that Frank knew about the prostitution ring operation in his home.

Even writers who were absolutely untroubled by openly homosexual lawmaker in 1989 thought that Frank should have resigned. Or they at least acknowledged that there was an abuse of his office.

You would think that a juicy sex-scandal, with admitted ethical lapses, that nearly ended a politician's career would at least merit a reference in these short summaries of his career. Surely most articles about Bill Clinton's term mention his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Tributes to Mark Sanford's tenure as South Carolina governor mention his affair.

Of course, the scandal was 20 years ago. Voters in Frank's district were more forgiving than the editorialists at the time. And surely many journalists are sympathetic to Frank and to the causes he champions.

But still, this seems like a glaring omission. Barney Frank is a witty, charming, and knowledgeable legislator. He was also someone who seriously compromised himself in office.
https://www.businessinsider.com/the...barney-frank-tributes-the-prostitutes-2011-11

AND THAT'S WHY D.C. IS AN EXPENSIVE PLACE TO LIVE!

 

[katzgar]

Buzzword fallacy. Doesn't answer any of my questions. Where is the raw data? What were the questions asked? Who was polled? When was the poll conducted?

you are being a drug addled moron

 

[USFREEDOM911]

whoops... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...p-13-percentage-points-nationally/1425173001/

And then there's this, showing June 4 years ago. ;D

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You're mad because you know no one wants to grab your pussy. You can't sell that nasty thing.

That's not fair; because I'm sure some illegal immigrant would give her 25 cents, for a shot at it.

 

[katzgar]

And then there's this, showing June 4 years ago. ;D

your point that the polls were correct and Clinton beat trump in the general election is correct

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I think you have a typo what you meant to say is Clinton whooped trump by 3 million votes

Did she ever get her "Participation Trophy"??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Well, she won by three million votes, so they weren't far wrong.

And what did she win??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Why bother holding elections then, kid? Can't let a lot of bloody people decide their own government, can we?

But they did decide by an EC vote of 306 to 232.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Polls can only predict popular votes as they would be at the date the poll was taken, let alone not trying to predict vote-fixing (not their job). The thickoes can never understand these hard things!

Then why do liberals seem to be clinging to it, like a drowning man to a bit of straw??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

meh, silly Fox talking points

how do you explain this:

New 2020 head-to-heads in national Quinnipiac poll just out:

Biden 53%, Trump 40%
Sanders 51%, Trump 42%
Harris 49%, Trump 41%
Warren 49%, Trump 42%
Buttigieg 47%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%

Biden's not your daddy's only concern nitwit

How do YOU explain this, from June of 2015; which is exactly the same time length as what you're promoting:

 

[USFREEDOM911]

we're talking about a presidential popular vote, which Hillary won by 3,000,000

Trump won the EC, winning 3 states by 79K votes

you're one dumb fuck

 

[USFREEDOM911]

People lie, and pollsters know they lie



People often don’t tell the truth to pollsters, and often report that they have voted in the past when records reveal that they haven’t.

We recently surveyed 8,567 registered voters using state voter files, and asked each respondent to describe his or her voting behavior in detail.

We then compared each person’s survey response to his or her public voting history, measuring how often people say they vote, versus how often they actually vote.

The survey results were stunning: 78.1 percent of the poll’s respondents over-reported their actual voting histories.

Voting respondents fell into three main groups: those who vote in every election, those who vote only in presidential and midterm elections, and those who vote only in presidential elections. In each of these three categories, a majority of respondents over-reported their actual voting histories. Only among people who said they “never vote” did we find a majority of respondents telling the truth.

These findings highlight a particularly strong “social desirability bias” with respect to voting habits: survey respondents answer in a way they think will be viewed favorably by others, rather than simply answering truthfully.

While pollsters have known about (and tried to control for) this phenomenon for some time, this new study reflects just how pervasive this problem is throughout the electorate.

If the overwhelming majority (nearly 80 percent) of registered voters are over-reporting their past voting habits, even larger numbers of voters could be over-reporting their intent to vote in upcoming elections.

Not only can people lie about whether they vote or not, they can also lie about who they voted for - and there's no way to check.




https://www.campaignsandelections.com/campaign-insider/voters-are-lying-to-us-here-s-why-it-could-be-helpful

I remember a poll, from SEVERAL years ago, and it found that over 90% of the polls, are 100% wrong.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Do you think Trump will ever get passed his "grabbin' women by the pussy" confession?

Whatever your answer is to that- is the answer to both questions! LOL! Make it light on yourself!

Care to show where he said HE had ever done it, other then the liberal rewrite of the comment??

I already know it's going to be a nothing burger.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

didn't know Hillary was running, thanks for the heads up

Evidently, neither did enough voters to give her the EC votes.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Sanity vs. insanity!

We tried to tell you that ripping babies from their mothers was an insane idea- but you didn't listen and you didn't care.

We tried to tell you that praising our enemies while insulting our allies was insane- but you didn't listen.

We tried to tell you that Donald Trump's lying and cheating was going to catch up with him- but you didn't listen!

We tried to tell you that gifting 1/10th of 1% of Americas richest citizens with ridiculous tax breaks while putting the entire tax burden off on America's hardest workers was insane- but you wouldn't listen.

We tried to warn you that passing that insane tax bill was going to create the largest deficit ever and at a rate faster than any other deficit in American history- and you didn't listen.

We tried to tell you that Donald Trump colluded with Russia and then obstructed Justice on many counts- and you wouldn't listen.

I could go on all day about- you not listening!

But that is OK now- because you can go listen to what the Polls are saying now! BLHAHAHAHAHAHA!

And YOU (the liberals) said that Hillary was going to win in a "landslide"!!

 

[USFREEDOM911]

9 of them...perfect for a baseball team...The Forum Flakes.

I would rather have them named the Just Plain Politics Posers.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

the GOP fears Biden, more obvious every day

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Look, we get it! Because you are such a politically motivated Republican asshole, and you love to use the same old Swift-Boat attacks on all of your political adversaries or people you don't like, and while taking everything out of proper context, you also amplify, distort, fabricate, falsify, heighten, inflate, magnify, misrepresent, overdo, overdraw, overemphasize, overestimate, boast, boost, brag, caricature, color, corrupt, enlarge, exalt, expand, fudge, hike, hyperbolize, intensify, lie, misquote, pad, puff-it-up, scam, stretch, blow out of proportion, build up, cook up. go to extremes, lay it on thick, loud talk it, make too much of it, misreport, pretty up, and put everyone on because that is just what asshole Republicans do! Did I leave anything out? LOL!

GOT IT!

Here! Let me do you a favor!

If you stop lying about Democrats, I'll stop telling the truth about Republicans!

[translation]------>

<-----[/translation]

​

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Despite the trumpite Nazi-style gobbledegook, Mrs Clinton very clearly beat the senile fatman by three million votes, as you know.

[translation]------>

<-----[/translation]

​

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I tend to think in democratic terms, altkampfer. How you fix things to avoid it is hardly the job of Public Opinion Polls.

Founding Fathers distrusted popular vote to pick a president

ORIGINS
The Electoral College was devised at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It was a compromise meant to strike a balance between those who wanted popular elections for president and those who wanted no public input. Alexander Hamilton wrote, “If the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent.

At the time, the country had just 13 states, and the founders were worried about one state exercising outsized influence. Small states didn’t want states with big populations to dominate. Southern states with slaves who couldn’t vote worried that Northern states would have a louder voice. There were concerns that people in one state wouldn’t know much about candidates from other states. The logistics of a national election were daunting. The thinking was that if candidates had to win multiple states rather than just the popular vote, they would have to attract broader support.