140 'IMPEACH TRUMP!' rallies underway across the nation

ThatOwlWoman said:
Fox News:

"While protests were being eyed across the country, California seemed to be the main state for the demonstration. The Mercury News reported that more than 140 rallies were expected through Southern California and across the nation overall."

And as referenced in the Fox article:

https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/06...-to-be-held-around-southern-california-today/
Click to expand...

Fail. Like the OP. The ones I did see had less than a couple of hundred people each. If 140 is even a hypothetical number that would be 28,000 people out of 330 million in this country. Statistically insignificant. Nothing other than a feel good moment for some confused people, and a source of quick income for promoters.
 
Sailor said:
Fail. Like the OP. The ones I did see had less than a couple of hundred people each. If 140 is even a hypothetical number that would be 28,000 people out of 330 million in this country. Statistically insignificant. Nothing other than a feel good moment for some confused people, and a source of quick income for promoters.
Click to expand...

So very similar then to your typical ToadstoolEgoRally(tm). Gotcha.

ETA: I remember when you guys used to celebrate free speech. Not so much anymore, eh?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
So very similar then to your typical ToadstoolEgoRally(tm). Gotcha.

ETA: I remember when you guys used to celebrate free speech. Not so much anymore, eh?
Click to expand...

Who said anything about their right to free speech? Let them have it. They just look stupid. That is not against any laws or rights.

Obviously my 28,000 possible protestors was way to generous.

Impeach Trump rally draws dozens, and 1 counter-protester who calls him 'greatest president since Ronald Reagan' https://expo.lehighvalleylive.com/news/g66l-2019/06/ccc9f562075229/impeach-trump-rally-draws-dozens-and-1-counterprotester-who-calls-him-greatest-president-since-ronald-reagan.html
 
Loving91390 said:
Impeach for what ?
Click to expand...

^Another uninformed RW stupid fuck.

FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
 
Darth Omar said:
Did they ever decide what they want to impeach him for lol?
Click to expand...

How many dozens of times have I posted this for you, idiot?

FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
 
domer76 said:
How many dozens of times have I posted this for you, idiot?

FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
Click to expand...

Why do you keep telling me that lol?

There’s over 300 Democrats in the House that need to rise up before we can even talk about impeachment.
 
Darth Omar said:
Why do you keep telling me that lol?

There’s over 300 Democrats in the House that need to rise up before we can even talk about impeachment.
Click to expand...

Because you keep asking the same stupid fucking questions that have been answered dozens of times. I'd recommend ANYONE literate that can read it to you and explain every word on a third grade level.

I can't fix your illiteracy. That's on you, moron.
 
domer76 said:
Because you keep asking the same stupid fucking questions that have been answered dozens of times. I'd recommend ANYONE literate that can read it to you and explain every word on a third grade level.

I can't fix your illiteracy. That's on you, moron.
Click to expand...

But that doesn’t seem to be impeachment worthy or things would be happening lol.

When you can’t get your own party on board the Impeachment Train how do you expect to get Republicans on board?

Your certain this is impeachment worthy, right?
 
Darth Omar said:
But that doesn’t seem to be impeachment worthy or things would be happening lol.

When you can’t get your own party on board the Impeachment Train how do you expect to get Republicans on board?

Your certain this is impeachment worthy, right?
Click to expand...

"would be"? :rofl2:

Another one of your concocted fantasies. You won't know "would be" from shit. You can't even comprehend the straight forward links that I provide you.

Let's get those financial records and develop enough proof that even the Senate cowards can't look away.

A thousand former federal prosecutors say that it is not only impeachment worth. It's prosecutable, except that he is President.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top