Not at all. Just bringing up the fact that most on the left saw nothing wrong with it, defended it when brought up and now think it is a problem.
Does anyone support getting 'Opposition Info' from Russia, China, Israel, Saudi, ...
- Thread starter Jack
- Start date
Not at all. Just bringing up the fact that most on the left saw nothing wrong with it, defended it when brought up and now think it is a problem.
This "no collusion" crap is getting tiresome.
For two years, Rudi down to the Trumpkins on this forum were telling us collusion isn't a crime, which technically it isn't, but now those same parties are telling us Trump is innocent cause Mueller didn't find collusion. How does that work?
What Mueller said is that he couldn't develop a conspiracy to collide, basically meaning the Trump campaign didn't know what they were doing was illegal, but Mueller did make a point of documenting over a hundred contacts between Russians and the Trump campaign. Anyone who read the report would see Russians were all over the campaign seemingly doing everything but parking cars
So the escape generalization "no collusion" isn't really applicable to anything relevant
context is not whataboutism// Steele dossier corrupted DoJ / FBI and it looks like State.
In a couple months this will be forgotten with the blizzard of indictments on the Deep State Creeps.
Believe me on this..
I was right about the Deep State and I was correct there was no Russian collusion from day #1
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Chimpanzee! What are you retarded are something?
And rushes in to prove it. Were you dropped on your head a lot as a child or is it genetic? I am guessing both.
you are 1/2 way correct. To be legally informative I ( in my mind) substitute the word ( conspire) for "collusion"
If your sentence still reads right -then you know you are composing a legit idea.
But you fail to demonstrate lack of knowledge of the law is why Trump did not collude.
instead you muddy the water as did Mueller with this inanity
1000 or 100 contacts don't make any damn difference -
only the type of interactions matter -and there was no conspiring with Da Russians
And the buck stops in the Oval Office.
it's breaking ,but Judicial Watch got Emails that State was funneling to the FBI as well.
They're in it up to their eyeballs.
which is weird considering when Steele met with that State dept woman ( under Vicky Nuland) she took the time to notify FBI not to use Steele for anything as he was a corrupt partisan.
and all this was before the first FISA
don't get over your skies
You can't substitute the two, collusion isn't a crime, and next to impossible to prove, conspiring would be illegal, saying one is not guilty of collusion really isn't saying much
And the interactions do matter, lets substitute another, North Korea for Russia, you telling us that if the Clinton campaign had over hundred direct contacts with North Korea to include meetings with top Clinton advisors that alone wouldn't raise questions on the right?
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Are you trying to say that my little chimp laughing at you hurts your little feelings or something?
You are off on conspiracies now, anytime you see such as Judicial Watch it is a give away
Are you trying to say that my little chimp laughing at you hurts your little feelings or something?
Not at all. I am saying your little chimp is an actual representation of you and your intellect. What do you have to say about the thread.
It's a tangled web. The example you provide plus so many other uncovered instances show that nothing and no one
was going to stop Comey from getting those FISA's......and he KNEW along that they were unverified.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
I have had plenty to say in this thread!
Go back and read all of my comments.
I was asked what law was broken by Trump accepting dirt on Hillary, and where was it in the Constitution! I answered that perfectly!
I was asked why I was not mad about Hillary doing the same thing! I answered that perfectly as well!
In fact, I believe I am one of the few who actually has added anything of any value to this thread!
Now go read what I wrote- and learn! And if my little chimp hurts your feelings again, you let me know, and I'll make him stop!
Adolf_Twitler;3099617[B said:]I have had plenty to say in this thread!
Go back and read all of my comments.
[/B]
I was asked what law was broken by Trump accepting dirt on Hillary, and where was it in the Constitution! I answered that perfectly!
I was asked why I was not mad about Hillary doing the same thing! I answered that perfectly as well!
In fact, I believe I am one of the few who actually has added anything of any value to this thread!
Now go read what I wrote- and learn! And if my little chimp hurts your feelings again, you let me know, and I'll make him stop!
All anyone sees is your fag ass little monkey. Or your self posted picture. Same thing.
Want to pay the millions of dollars that oppo research costs, and then repeat that? It has real value and is expensive. It is a thing of value. Trump also got the advantage of 1.3 million dollars a month hacking organization from Putin.
Judicial Watch.
Fake news.
“Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and a very poor fact check record.”