Reuters, released a day before Harvard, shows that Harvard is a mistaken outlier. Trum is right at 43%, nothing new.
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample
Approve
Disapprove
Spread
RCP Average 5/16 - 5/30 -- 43.1 53.8 -10.7
Harvard-Harris 5/29 - 5/30 1295 RV 48 52 -4
Reuters/Ipsos 5/28 - 5/29 984 RV 42 56 -14
Rasmussen Reports 5/28 - 5/30 1500 LV 48 51 -3
Economist/YouGov 5/26 - 5/28 1120 RV 44 52 -8
The Hill/HarrisX 5/24 - 5/25 1001 RV 44 56 -12
CBS News 5/17 - 5/20 1101 A 41 52 -11
Monmouth 5/16 - 5/20 719 RV 41 52 -11
Quinnipiac 5/16 - 5/20 1078 RV 38 57 -19
Politico/Morning Consult 5/17 - 5/19 1995 RV 42 56 -14
Two of your polls show 48%, two show 44%...so no, that's not Harvard's being some extreme outlier. But even if that were a valid example of an outlier, you're still talking about one made-up BS poll contradicting another. Who cares? No one takes this crap seriously except liberals...especially after the last election. That's the only reason to point out polls at all...to watch liberals lose their shit over them because they're too stupid to comprehend how fake and doctored all polls are.
But thanks for playing.



