Mueller speaks at 11 am today

2) This is why we investigated obstruction efforts.

Mueller's investigation was not about obstruction.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
 
You said he was going to tell Congress go go fuck themselves?

Do you believe him when he says he wasn't being prevented from testifying before Congress?

Case close.

Trump exonerated. Democrat party should move on

He said...

IF WE HAD EVIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO.
Then he said...
WE COULD NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY INDICT THE PRESIDENT.
Then he said...
SO COMMENTING ON HIS GUILT WOULD BE AGAINST DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES.

Read between the lines, RUMP is guilty.
 
He is likely to say what his report says, which will shock the Rumppers....... Plenty of evidence of collusion with Russia and the campaign, lack of evidence of Trump's involvement in that collusion (plausible deniability), and 10 instances of Obstruction which should be determined by others (Congress) if they are actionable.

Cry harder
 
3) insufficient efforts to charge a broader conspiracy on collusion.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
 
status quo. Mueller won't say a fucking thing -what a waste he was -except for more ginning up Russiphobia
 
He said...

IF WE HAD EVIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO.
Then he said...
WE COULD NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY INDICT THE PRESIDENT.
Then he said...
SO COMMENTING ON HIS GUILT WOULD BE AGAINST DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES.

Read between the lines, RUMP is guilty.

If he were innocent we would have said so.
We cant say he is guilty so we did not say so.
 
Now there is TAPE of the cop saying


I think he did it because the evidence is clear


I cant indict him


Congress needs to look and see if they need to remove the president for these crimes
 
He said...

IF WE HAD EVIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO.
Then he said...
WE COULD NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY INDICT THE PRESIDENT.
Then he said...
SO COMMENTING ON HIS GUILT WOULD BE AGAINST DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES.

Read between the lines, RUMP is guilty.

You're guilty of stupidity
 
6) The investigation was permitted, indictment not. A process other than indictment is necessary.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
 
He said...

IF WE HAD EVIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO.
Then he said...
WE COULD NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY INDICT THE PRESIDENT.
Then he said...
SO COMMENTING ON HIS GUILT WOULD BE AGAINST DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES.

Read between the lines, RUMP is guilty.

Well then Nancy best get to moving on impeachment. I welcome it

She won't and you won't hold her accountable.

BTW, you are a shitty lawyer. We don't look for evidence that someone didn't commit a crime that is akin to proving a negative. We have to find evidence that they COMMITTED a crime. Which he didn't do. Understand what you read
 
so the right cant LIE about what the report says now


Mueller is trying to save the nation

thank you sir


sorry for doubting you
 
7) You cannot accuse when an indictment is not possible. This is why they reached no determination.

The reason they reached no decision is that there was little evidence to support such a conclusion. The conclusion was vague and partisan in nature.
 
Once again, drink up -- it's Mueller Time. :laugh: :laugh:

the-worlds-most-expensive-nothing-burger-41012124.png
 
Back
Top