Last time Earth hit these CO2 levels there were trees at the South Pole

Teflon Don said:
I don’t have to defend myself
Click to expand...

Conservative path to debate:

1. Lose the debate
2. Make up shit about yourself
3. Refuse to verify the shit you make up about yourself
4. Pretend you don't care about the made up stuff you just went through the effort of making up.
 
LV426 said:
From the planet being formed, you fucking fraud.

Now I have to explain how planets are formed to you?

Shouldn't you already know this as a self-described and professed instructor, or teacher, or professor, or whatever bullshit credential you're trying to fake today?

Wow.

You're not a teacher and you never were, huh?

You've been faking those credentials on this board this whole time to try and trick people into thinking there's some factual basis for the stupid shit you say here.
Click to expand...

You know how planets are formed?

WOW you must have had the coolest science experiment in Calvin Coolidge Elementary School. Here some kids are using styrofoam balls and you know how to make your own planet.

Well gosh darn
 
Oneuli said:
You dodged the question, pipsqueak. When was the last time in history you think the globe was warming as the current pace? Be specific, please.
Click to expand...

So why was the Arctic 6C warmer 9000 years ago, when CO2 concentration was almost half what it is now? You need to explain that before you can even attempt to understand warming cycles. Come to that why was the Arctic as warm between 1910 and 1940? The Washington Post even wrote about it in 1922.

https://edberry.com/blog/climate-physics/sea-ice/the-changing-arctic-monthly-weather-review-1922/
 
Teflon Don said:
You presume that you are important enough for me to worry about whether or not you believe me. You aren’t.
Click to expand...

You're working overtime to convince me of your fake credentials and by me refusing to accommodate that entitlement, you suddenly decide that you don't care about it?

If you didn't care so much about whether or not I believed your character backstory, why did you invoke it?
 
LV426 said:
Conservative path to debate:

1. Lose the debate
2. Make up shit about yourself
3. Refuse to verify the shit you make up about yourself
4. Pretend you don't care about the made up stuff you just went through the effort of making up.
Click to expand...

You just made this up
 
LV426 said:
You're working overtime to convince me of your fake credentials and by me refusing to accommodate that entitlement, you suddenly decide that you don't care about it?

If you didn't care so much about whether or not I believed your character backstory, why did you invoke it?
Click to expand...

You have already accommodated me
 
Teflon Don said:
But I can see how inconceivable it is that someone would own another home. It is unheard of
Click to expand...

Not any random person...just you, personally.

I do not believe that you, personally, own any property.

I believe that you, personally, only said you owned that property because you had no credible response to the debate about climate change, so instead you postured fake bullshit about yourself.

What a fraud. All Conservatives are as weak as you.
 
Teflon Don said:
I am not making an argument. I am just stating a fact
Click to expand...

No, you're stating fiction and trying to convince us it is fact, that way your position on this subject makes sense.

But you faked that backstory, didn't you? You do that a lot, I find. Whenever a debate gets to the point where you run out of talking points and facts, you immediately invoke a personal anecdote.

Then you use that lie to support your shitty position.

It's exactly what you did on this thread.

You got beat in the debate about the existence of Climate Change, and rather than concede that your position is bullshit, you postured fake given circumstances for yourself so your climate denial argument ceases to be about climate denial and about the persona you want people to think you have.

It's what you people do...Joe the Plumber, Julie Boonstra, Ashley Todd...all Conservatives ultimately end up doing the same thing; lying and then covering up that lie with more lies.
 
Teflon Don said:
My personal situation is not related to my skepticism on man made global warming which I believe to be a complete and utter fraud
Click to expand...

Sure it is...otherwise, why did you invoke it?

You want us to believe your position on this is informed by these fake personal circumstances you refuse to verify.

It's obvious why.
 
reagansghost said:
The impact of runaway emissions is already upon us. Several cities in the northern U.S., such as Buffalo, Cincinnati and Duluth, are already preparing to receive migrants from states like Florida, where residents are beset with increasing flooding, brutal heat waves, more severe and frequent hurricanes, sea level rise, and a worse allergy season. City planners in the aforementioned cities are already preparing by trying to figure out how to create jobs and housing for an influx of new residents.

Indications of the climate disruption refugee crisis are even more glaring in some other countries.

Large numbers of Guatemalan farmers already have to leave their land due to drought, flooding, and increasingly severe extreme weather events.

In low-lying Bangladesh, hundreds of thousands of people are already in the process of being displaced from coastal homes, and are moving into poverty-stricken areas of cities that are already unprepared to receive the influx of people. Given that 80 percent of the population of the country already lives in a flood plain, the crisis can only escalate with time as sea level rise continues to accelerate.



much more, great links:

https://truthout.org/articles/the-last-time-there-was-this-much-co2-trees-grew-at-the-south-pole/
Click to expand...

First time I see any trees down there I will let you know.
 
Teflon Don said:
How long can I expect it to take? A day? A week? A month? A year?

What modern conveniences have you eliminated from your life to save the planet from this supposed scourge that is man made global warming. Surely you live a complete 100% carbon neutral or carbon negative lifestyle
Click to expand...

Precisely the bolded!!! These types of people, for the most part, don't actually live how they speak... It's always for "everybody else" to do... It's the Leftist Marxist Democrat way, ya know... ;) ;)

If she drives a vehicle, she is contributing to the "problem"... If she eats meat, she is contributing to the "problem", if she uses a smartphone, she is contributing to the "problem", and on and on and on...
 
Teflon Don said:
Fair enough. It is ok if you don’t believe me. My skepticism of man made global warming was never predicated on my owning property
Click to expand...

1. When presented with studies and evidence, you deny it.
2. You produce nothing apart from numbers that exist in a vacuum
3. When #2 is pointed out to you, you retreat to the imaginary persona you created
4. When confronted on that persona's validity, you bristle and say you don't actually care, even though you cared enough to invoke it. So you invoked that fake persona so you could feel better about yourself.

So you act in bad faith because you don't know any other way to act.
 
LV426 said:
No, you're stating fiction and trying to convince us it is fact, that way your position on this subject makes sense.

But you faked that backstory, didn't you? You do that a lot, I find. Whenever a debate gets to the point where you run out of talking points and facts, you immediately invoke a personal anecdote.

Then you use that lie to support your shitty position.

It's exactly what you did on this thread.

You got beat in the debate about the existence of Climate Change, and rather than concede that your position is bullshit, you postured fake given circumstances for yourself so your climate denial argument ceases to be about climate denial and about the persona you want people to think you have.

It's what you people do...Joe the Plumber, Julie Boonstra, Ashley Todd...all Conservatives ultimately end up doing the same thing; lying and then covering up that lie with more lies.
Click to expand...

I wasn’t debating you on man made global warming. I don’t believe in it. That position is not debatable
 
LV426 said:
1. When presented with studies and evidence, you deny it.
2. You produce nothing apart from numbers that exist in a vacuum
3. When #2 is pointed out to you, you retreat to the imaginary persona you created
4. When confronted on that persona's validity, you bristle and say you don't actually care, even though you cared enough to invoke it. So you invoked that fake persona so you could feel better about yourself.

So you act in bad faith because you don't know any other way to act.
Click to expand...

There aren’t any real scientific studies. Just shitty math models.
 
Teflon Don said:
Speaking of property one wonders why really rich people who claim to believe in man made global warming are still buying beach front property when we are are supposed to be underwater in 10 years. Seems like a waste of money
Click to expand...

Don't know what the hell you're babbling about, but how does this answer to the wild claims you've made about yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top