Pursuant to law, Congress asks IRS Director for 6 years of Trumps tax returns. . .

Brad runs from the thread once again. Seems to be the usual routine; start a thread based on a lie. Get ass kicked on the lie. Run. :laugh:
 
Pursuant to law
What law?

Congress asks the IRS director for 6 years of Trumps tax returns.
Nothing compels a President to release tax returns. That is not a requirement for Presidency.

Trump responds that he is not inclined to honor the request.
And he is correct. Nothing compels him to do so.

AOC burns him good, "We did not ask you!"
Has she found McConnell's office yet??
 
Link please.

They are not examining evidence; they are attempting to FISH for it. There is no evidence and therefore, no criminal referral. It is NOT the job of the House of Representatives to FISH for crimes.

It is FISHING when there is no evidence of criminal activity. You cannot conduct a kangaroo court in the House of Representatives over perceptions of acts you don't like. They do that in third world shit holes like Zimbabwe.

-NOT a crime dumb fuck.

You poor sad, pathetic dumb fuck; it is not the Congresses role to conduct INVESTIGATIONS to determine criminality. That is REFERRED to the Justice Department within their jurisdiction. You cannot conduct a kangaroo court in the House of Representatives over perceptions of acts you don't like. They do that in third world shit holes like Zimbabwe.
.

Always humorous to check back later and see that "truthie" is just as wrong as he was on his no knows what attempt

"Congressional oversight refers to oversight by the United States Congress of the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies. Congressional oversight refers to the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation. Congress exercises this power largely through its congressional committee system. However, oversight, which dates to the earliest days of the Republic, also occurs in a wide variety of congressional activities and contexts. These include authorization, appropriations, investigative, and legislative hearings by standing committees; specialized investigations by select committees; and reviews and studies by congressional support agencies and staff."

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/b...e/chapter/the-oversight-function-of-congress/
https://oversight.house.gov/about/committee-jurisdiction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_oversight


Nobody has to "phish," there is already plenty of evidence that would merit an examination of any oversight Committee, Cohen's testimony alone raises serious questions

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46407999
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-russia-trump-investigations-20190222-story.html
https://www.apnews.com/d98914a14f12444482566596db0c0181
https://truthout.org/articles/trump-has-bigger-legal-problems-than-mueller/
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/27/poli...roubles-southern-district-new-york/index.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4dbcf38ba41_story.html?utm_term=.4aedf59ea51d
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/02/president-trumps-new-legal-nightmare/583897/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

And it is still amazing that any Trumpkin would pursue such a weak attempt to defend the Donald when they just witnessed ten years of GOP Congressional Committees investigating anything under the sun that had anything to do with Obama or Clinton, did all of those often redundant investigations have "evidence of criminal activity," or, were they "conducting a kangaroo court?"
 
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah........

Congressional oversight refers to the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation.

I just can't seem to find fishing for criminal behavior on the President. Where is that here? You poor, pathetic dumb fuck. :laugh:

And it is still amazing that any Trumpkin would pursue such a weak attempt to defend the Donald when they just witnessed ten years of GOP Congressional Committees investigating anything under the sun that had anything to do with Obama or Clinton, did all of those often redundant investigations have "evidence of criminal activity," or, were they "conducting a kangaroo court?"

More amazing, that an ignorant, low IQ dullard who has already had to eat a LOT of crow is asking for another HUGE helping. You must love crow snowflake. :laugh:
 
The Party and individual who demanded President Obama release his Birth Certificate
Being a natural born citizen who has resided in the U.S. for at least 14 years IS a Constitutional requirement for the Presidency. If there is doubt about that, it ought to be looked into... Releasing tax returns is NOT a said requirement.

is fighting to keep Rump's tax returns secret.
Not a requirement for the Presidency.
 
To ensure the president is not compromised in his dealings with foreign adversaries.

And what in his taxes do you think will show that?

Is that really the best you can offer?

What would lead you to believe he is?

Why aren’t you calling for ALL politicians to release their tax returns?
 
Other presidents were not forced to give their taxes to Congress, because each and every candidate released them when they ran. Just one did not. That is why Trump is treated differently. If he did as he said he was going to do and released his taxes, this would not be a problem. Trump made it into one by lying about it and then hiding them. It would make one think he has something to hide ,wouldn't it?

He is under ZERO legal obligation to do so regardless what others have done
 
I just can't seem to find fishing for criminal behavior on the President. Where is that here? You poor, pathetic dumb fuck. :laugh:

More amazing, that an ignorant, low IQ dullard who has already had to eat a LOT of crow is asking for another HUGE helping. You must love crow snowflake. :laugh:

Looks like "truthie" can't, or more so refuses, to process information, as I said, nobody has to "phish," there is already plenty of evidence that would merit an examination of any oversight Committee, Cohen's testimony alone raises serious questions. The fish are jumping on to the shore in Trump's situation

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46407999
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...222-story.html
https://www.apnews.com/d98914a14f12444482566596db0c0181
https://truthout.org/articles/trump-...-than-mueller/
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/27/polit...ork/index.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.4aedf59ea51d
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...htmare/583897/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_...f_Donald_Trump
 
He is under ZERO legal obligation to do so regardless what others have done

You still don't get it, of course all of this is going to wind up in the Courts, Trump put beer ball Brett there for a reason, and everything Trump does winds up in the Courts, it is his way of waiting out the opposition, however, in this case, the opposition is public opinion.

It ain't going to look good for him politically if come 2020 he has numerous legal entanglements going all designed to keep him from releasing information. No matter how he frames it, even with the full support of Fox and the army of demogogues, Americans are going to want to know why he is purposely hiding so much from public view.

When a person goes to such lengths to hide something it is common nature to ask why
 
Pursuant to law Congress asks the IRS director for 6 years of Trumps tax returns.


Trump responds that he is not inclined to honor the request.


AOC burns him good, "We did not ask you!"

There is nothing more disgusting and puerile than lifelong bureaucrats and their obsequious parrots digging around the private affairs of a private citizen for dirt. You stay out of our business.
 
I just can't seem to find fishing for criminal behavior on the President. Where is that here? You poor, pathetic dumb fuck. :laugh:

More amazing, that an ignorant, low IQ dullard who has already had to eat a LOT of crow is asking for another HUGE helping. You must love crow snowflake. :laugh:

Lets repeat the facts for "truthie" one more time, nobody has to "phish," there is already plenty of evidence that would merit an examination of any oversight Committee, Cohen's testimony alone raises serious questions.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46407999
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...222-story.html
https://www.apnews.com/d98914a14f12444482566596db0c0181
https://truthout.org/articles/trump-...-than-mueller/
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/27/polit...ork/index.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.4aedf59ea51d
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...htmare/583897/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_...f_Donald_Trump

As I said, as it pertains to Trump, the fish are jumping onto the shore in droves on their own
 
Being a natural born citizen who has resided in the U.S. for at least 14 years IS a Constitutional requirement for the Presidency. If there is doubt about that, it ought to be looked into... Releasing tax returns is NOT a said requirement.

Only RWNJs claimed that Obama wasn't born in the US. And the biggest nut job of them all was trump.
 
There is nothing more disgusting and puerile than lifelong bureaucrats and their obsequious parrots digging around the private affairs of a private citizen for dirt. You stay out of our business.

trump himself keeps saying he's been audited for years, more than any other person on the face of the earth, according to him. Maybe you should ask why.
 
Trump's taking it on the chin from every direction.........Inaugurationgate is moving along nicely as well as House subpoenas for the actual Mueller Report


USA!
USA!
USA!
 
Only RWNJs claimed that Obama wasn't born in the US. And the biggest nut job of them all was trump.

So?

Whoever brought this point up, is quite astute.

Think about it.

The issue with Obama (stupid is as it was, I said from day one he is a Citizen) was an actual Constitutional issue. Stupid or not, it was a Constitutional issue.

The issue with Trump and his taxes is not Constitutional.

Do you see the difference?
 
Back
Top