Pursuant to law, Congress asks IRS Director for 6 years of Trumps tax returns. . .

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Pursuant to law Congress asks the IRS director for 6 years of Trumps tax returns.


Trump responds that he is not inclined to honor the request.


AOC burns him good, "We did not ask you!"
 
pursuant to what law? what probable cause to investigate -the IRS is the enforcement agency, not Congress
 
26 U.S.C. 6103 - No need for PC, there is never a need for PC to investigate.


You really think the IRS which is run by the President is just going to turn over the returns? You don't think this will end up in a court battle?
 
not only does Trump have to fight to keep his tax returns secret, Cummings going after his businesses...........those records are already on the way, no approval from anyone necessary.....SWEET!


An accounting firm is asking the House Oversight and Reform Committee to issue it a subpoena before sending lawmakers 10 years of President Donald Trump’s financial records, the panel’s chairman said on Wednesday, adding that the firm intends to turn over the documents.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) told reporters that Mazars USA, a tax and accounting firm, has asked the committee for a so-called “friendly” subpoena so that it can formalize the process of complying with the panel’s request.

“They have told us that they will provide the information pretty much when they have a subpoena,” Cummings said. “And we’ll get them a subpoena.”


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/03/cummings-subpoena-trump-tax-records-1253480
 
26 U.S.C. 6103(f)(1)...

(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
 
You really think the IRS which is run by the President is just going to turn over the returns? You don't think this will end up in a court battle?

I think they are legally required to by law. I do not see any argument that will not be summarily rejected by the court.
 
The Party and individual who demanded President Obama release his Birth Certificate is fighting to keep Rump's tax returns secret.
 
I think they are legally required to by law. I do not see any argument that will not be summarily rejected by the court.

Well, if you don't see it, then I don't see how you could possibly be wrong. I mean you couldn't see how Mueller wouldn't find COLLUSION so.................
 
I think they are legally required to by law. I do not see any argument that will not be summarily rejected by the court.

Has the law ever been challenged in court?

Can you cite the number of times Congress has exercised this power?

Do you and the democrat party really want to go down this path? Do you not realize the hell you will unleash? You don't see any scenario where this could bite the democrats in the ass?

Or are you so singularly focused on trying to get Trump impeached and thrown out of office you have lost sight of everything else?

You people never learn. But, you never disappoint. You make it so easy to predict your actions
 
Has the law ever been challenged in court?

Can you cite the number of times Congress has exercised this power?

Do you and the democrat party really want to go down this path? Do you not realize the hell you will unleash? You don't see any scenario where this could bite the democrats in the ass?

Or are you so singularly focused on trying to get Trump impeached and thrown out of office you have lost sight of everything else?

You people never learn. But, you never disappoint. You make it so easy to predict your actions

1) Never been challenged that I know of, it its like challenging the speed limit, no likely legal grounds for a challenge.
2) I'm sure its been used, just never against the president. But again, so what? The law is the law regardless of how rarely its used.
3) I want the Democrats to go down this path, because I want transparency in government.
4) What am I losing sight of? I think all presidents should disclose their taxes.

Do you realize the precedent you are setting by letting Trump get away with so much? Do you see a way that could bite you in the ass later?
 
Well, if you don't see it, then I don't see how you could possibly be wrong. I mean you couldn't see how Mueller wouldn't find COLLUSION so.................

Do you see a legal argument? Explain it to me.....???

You are lying about what I said about Collusion and you know it.
 
1) Never been challenged that I know of, it its like challenging the speed limit, no likely legal grounds for a challenge.
2) I'm sure its been used, just never against the president. But again, so what? The law is the law regardless of how rarely its used.
3) I want the Democrats to go down this path, because I want transparency in government.
4) What am I losing sight of? I think all presidents should disclose their taxes.

Do you realize the precedent you are setting by letting Trump get away with so much? Do you see a way that could bite you in the ass later?


So you don't think a President would use this to review ANY Congresspersons taxes? I mean they are Co Equal branches right?

Why are you only concerned about a President releasing their taxes and not ANY politician? You don't have concerns about ANY politician making money off of their time in office? What about their family members?
 
Back
Top