damning proof of innocence that FBI withheld in Russian probe

She was able to bleach bit hard drives, destroy cell phones, delete emails and the FBI just looked the other way. Comey gave her his blessing for all the criminal activity so she's not that stupid.
 
I didn't, she was ahead by 12 points and would win in a landslide, no path to the presidency for Trump. With that context and the media and the far left loons and Soros backing her, she should have won in a landslide but it was Trump who won...in an electoral landslide.
It’s very dishonest of you to keep repeating a lie.
 
Please post a link so we know you haven’t left out details, like your snopes article, unfortunately, you can’t be trusted.

Please learn to read.

TOWNHALL

Just paste the text in your search engine and hit ENTER. You can't be trusted...to read.
 
Please learn to read.

TOWNHALL

Just paste the text in your search engine and hit ENTER. You can't be trusted...to read.

5. When Posting Copyrighted Material.. All material posted from copyrighted material MUST contain a link to the original work. Proper format is to post the first few paragraphs and then link to the article for the rest. Please don't repost entire articles here.
Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
 
5. When Posting Copyrighted Material.. All material posted from copyrighted material MUST contain a link to the original work. Proper format is to post the first few paragraphs and then link to the article for the rest. Please don't repost entire articles here.
Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

Here's the link and attribution:

The Hillary Project ^ | Monday, November 19, 2007 | Selwyn Duke

As I posted.
 
I'm driven by repulsion to un-elected bureaucrats who think they can overturn an election by nefarious malfeasance.

You mean scumbags like Donald "Birther-in-Chief" Trump who, as an unelected bureaucrat thought he could (and tried like hell to do so) overturn the election of Obama by nefarious malfeasance?

Is that the kind of behavior you're babbling about, hypocrite?
 
No, it’s not the link, I thought you were smart...

You thought "Earl" was smart????

hillbilly-uncle-earl.jpg


Why?????? :dunno:

I am smart and much better educated than you.

You sure don't look it, "Earl".

I've seen scurvy dogs that look smarter and better educated than you.

Guys named "Earl" are generally stupid redneck hillbillies. You give no indication that you are any different.
 
Snakes only bite to either eat or defend themselves. These guys don't have those ethics.

I actually considered that while I was posting it.

Had a stopped and put a little more thought into it, I'd have said "slither" instead of bite.

Apropos, too as that is what those on the slimy reptilian right do on their way coming out from and going back underneath the rocks they dwell under.
 
They are everywhere you look, scumbag. It's called common knowledge.

As I explained before, i don't waste my time debunking giant piles of bullshit point by point and turd by turd.

If lamebrains like you, noisenatta and the rest of the the goofball contingent here want to gobble that shit down, be my guest.

No skin off my ass.
Yet I'm not the one who's flailing like a hooked fish.

Produce your counter sources or you can simply shut the fuck up. ;)
 
Yet I'm not the one who's flailing like a hooked fish.

Produce your counter sources or you can simply shut the fuck up. ;)

Why should I research the accuracy of claims made in an OP ED PIECE that was merely copy/pasted in the OP?

It doesn't even claim to be a reporting of news or facts.

It's just the ultra-biased speculation of a known partisan political hack conspiracy kook.

You need to either produce sources to back him up or you can simply shut the fuck up. ;)
 
Back
Top