Why was Trump's campaign sharing polling data with Russia?

https://www.fec.gov/updates/foreign-nationals/#Prohibition


The Act and Commission regulations include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States. 52 U.S.C. § 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20. In general, foreign nationals are prohibited from the following activities:

Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States;
Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.

Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to an FEC enforcement action, criminal prosecution, or both.
 
see they are Russian bots

they just keep repeating the Russian lies no matter how many times they have been debunked by facts
 
Sailor said:
TDS truly has affected the minds of some liberals. Fucked them right in the head.
Click to expand...

I'm not politically active except I vote. It's the only issue I care about, the destruction of Trump. Until that is accomplished,
everything else is commentary. It's that vital. My esteem for my own country depends on people 1/2 as intelligent as I am never being
closer to the white house than Gaithersburg.
 
Sailor said:
All of that means there is nothing to indict Trump with.
Click to expand...

Of course it does. That is the legal framework from which an indictment will occur. You claimed there was no evidence, "nada, zilch etc etc"
That assessment can only be made if one misapprehends the nature of evidence and instead believes evidence is only that which standing alone
directly points an accusatory finger. That's not the case at all. Evidence that contributes to the case is like building a house with thousands of bricks.
Hundreds of pallets of bricks are already known that contribute to the "house" of a Trump indictment. For a quick example, his foolish TV request for
Hillary's missing emails, for another, the very fact of a meeting of his sons with Russians, for another his tweet fits attacking the investigation, or for
example his decisions to hire and fire certain personnel. Each one is relevant evidence that will be used in indictments against Trump. They are relevant and will
be admitted in evidence. So your statement that there is no evidence is simply "false."
 
Micawber said:
Of course it does. That is the legal framework from which an indictment will occur. You claimed there was no evidence, "nada, zilch etc etc"
That assessment can only be made if one misapprehends the nature of evidence and instead believes evidence is only that which standing alone
directly points an accusatory finger. That's not the case at all. Evidence that contributes to the case is like building a house with thousands of bricks.
Hundreds of pallets of bricks are already known that contribute to the "house" of a Trump indictment. For a quick example, his foolish TV request for
Hillary's missing emails, for another, the very fact of a meeting of his sons with Russians, for another his tweet fits attacking the investigation, or for
example his decisions to hire and fire certain personnel. Each one is relevant evidence that will be used in indictments against Trump. They are relevant and will
be admitted in evidence. So your statement that there is no evidence is simply "false."
Click to expand...

too bad there's no evidence of any evidence.
 
Micawber said:
Of course it does. That is the legal framework from which an indictment will occur. You claimed there was no evidence, "nada, zilch etc etc"
That assessment can only be made if one misapprehends the nature of evidence and instead believes evidence is only that which standing alone
directly points an accusatory finger. That's not the case at all. Evidence that contributes to the case is like building a house with thousands of bricks.
Hundreds of pallets of bricks are already known that contribute to the "house" of a Trump indictment. For a quick example, his foolish TV request for
Hillary's missing emails, for another, the very fact of a meeting of his sons with Russians, for another his tweet fits attacking the investigation, or for
example his decisions to hire and fire certain personnel. Each one is relevant evidence that will be used in indictments against Trump. They are relevant and will
be admitted in evidence. So your statement that there is no evidence is simply "false."
Click to expand...

What charges have been brought up against Trump specifically? What evidence has been produced that Trump is complicit in any of this? Those are all I would like to see you or anyone produce. Now would be good.
 
evince said:
https://www.fec.gov/updates/foreign-nationals/#Prohibition


The Act and Commission regulations include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States. 52 U.S.C. § 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20. In general, foreign nationals are prohibited from the following activities:

Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States;
Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.

Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to an FEC enforcement action, criminal prosecution, or both.
Click to expand...

post 61

Its Illegal
 
evince said:
are you fucking jesting?

you support the most corrupt president in USA history
Click to expand...

And the sad part is Sailor is a patriot in every other respect, but that his tribal affiliation overrides it.
That is EXACTLY why the US is broken. The blame falls directly on Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and the entire propaganda model of
misinformation that has been successfully marketed to the conservatives in the USA for a couple decades. The USA heartland and red state USA
is in the grips of professionally executed brainwashing. The saddest part is that is was done simply to make a buck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top