Roger Stone

domer76 said:
Your question, you stupid fucktard:

"Who ever said that?"

My answer with actual video:

"Trump said it,"

Go back to peeling spuds, dumbshit. Even a simple thread is too difficult for you.
Click to expand...

Obviously you did not read the thread. No surprise there midget. Try standing on a chair or something.
 
In his letter to Feinstein, Stone's attorney said his client simply wants his information aired in public, and not subject to selective leaks that marked his closed-door testimony to the House Intelligence Committee last year. Stone had asked for that appearance to be public but the committee declined and instead interviewed him privately.

Smith also said Feinstein's request for documents was "far too overbroad, far too overreaching, far too wide ranging."

"Mr. Stone respectfully declines to produce any documents and declines the invitation for an interview," Smith wrote.

Smith noted he expects Stone's House Intelligence Committee testimony to be posted publicly in the next few weeks.

Robert Buschel, another Stone attorney, told POLITICO that his client's decision to spurn Feinstein's request was not a reflection of increasing legal peril from Mueller. Rather, he said, it's because the Senate Democratic minority "leaks too much."

"The Ranking minority member tweeted out Mr. Stone's letter without as much as contacting his counsel to discuss. This proves Mr. Stone's point," Buschel said.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/04/roger-stone-fifth-amendment-1044597

Feinstein has become pure partisan trash.
 
noise said:
In his letter to Feinstein, Stone's attorney said his client simply wants his information aired in public, and not subject to selective leaks that marked his closed-door testimony to the House Intelligence Committee last year. Stone had asked for that appearance to be public but the committee declined and instead interviewed him privately.

Smith also said Feinstein's request for documents was "far too overbroad, far too overreaching, far too wide ranging."

"Mr. Stone respectfully declines to produce any documents and declines the invitation for an interview," Smith wrote.

Smith noted he expects Stone's House Intelligence Committee testimony to be posted publicly in the next few weeks.

Robert Buschel, another Stone attorney, told POLITICO that his client's decision to spurn Feinstein's request was not a reflection of increasing legal peril from Mueller. Rather, he said, it's because the Senate Democratic minority "leaks too much."

"The Ranking minority member tweeted out Mr. Stone's letter without as much as contacting his counsel to discuss. This proves Mr. Stone's point," Buschel said.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/04/roger-stone-fifth-amendment-1044597

Feinstein has become pure partisan trash.
Click to expand...
Why do you believe known liars?
 
Sailor said:
Obviously you did not read the thread. No surprise there midget. Try standing on a chair or something.
Click to expand...

This has gotten to be a pattern with you hasn’t it, arguing over who’s read material everyone can go back and look at for themselves. Would you say you’re, what do they call it, “conservative”?
 
Sailor said:
"Mr. Stone's invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege must be understood by all to be the assertion of a Constitutional right by an innocent citizen who denounces secrecy," Stone's attorney, Grant Smith, said in the letter, dated Dec. 3."

"In his letter to Feinstein, Stone's attorney said his client simply wants his information aired in public, and not subject to selective leaks that marked his closed-door testimony to the House Intelligence Committee last year. Stone had asked for that appearance to be public but the committee declined and instead interviewed him privately.

Smith also said Feinstein's request for documents was "far too overbroad, far too overreaching, far too wide ranging."

"Mr. Stone respectfully declines to produce any documents and declines the invitation for an interview," Smith wrote."

Sounds to me like he wants a public hearing. So anyone can see what he says.
Click to expand...

That's what Comey wanted and the GOP freaked out.
 
Phantasmal said:
Sounds to me like he doesn’t want to answer questions at all. He won’t turn over documentation, either. That’s telling!

Maybe, Stone can get the same deal as Comey.
Click to expand...

Maybe Stone should redact his documents to gibberish, and then turn them over, like some other people do lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top