You're the one who said the cake "represents" something...what that "something" is, you don't say. When asked to reference where in the Bible it ascribes a representation to the cake, you clam up. So that's why I think your faith is phony and insincere. God probably does too, if she exists.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
You're the one who said the cake "represents" something...what that "something" is, you don't say. When asked to reference where in the Bible it ascribes a representation to the cake, you clam up. So that's why I think your faith is phony and insincere. God probably does too, if she exists.
Nasty is cornering your faith?
How has your faith benefited you? You're on message boards picking fights with people because homosexuality upsets your personal sensitivities. Now, why is that? Probably because of your own sexual repression.
You have cornered nothing, my faith in God is strong. I did not realize you were a homosexual, my arguments were not meant to harm but to enlighten. You do not have to believe for God to exist.
Such as, what?
A sacrifice? Are you slaughtering goats outside your single-wide again?
A flagellation? Do you whip yourself with chains and stuff? Weirdo.
You're making shit up as you go.
Since regret based on the definition of the term repent. I spelled "repent" for you since you're too stupid to be able to do so. Look it up.
So what determines if the regret is sincere? How is that judged?
Not, what. Who. You'll find out the moment you die when you're judged.
There's nothing sincere about "sincere regret" either, since you can't articulate the difference between insincere regret and sincere regret.
What happens if the regret is insincere? Bolt of lightning from the sky? How will the invisible sky fairy know your regret is insincere?
I don't have to. That's God's job.
You're the one making shit up and setting arbitrary standards as you go.
You're the one claiming you have knowledge but proving you don't.
Get back to your boyfriend, faggot. He's waiting on you.
LOL!
Knowledge and faith are antonyms.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Think about it for a minute. Which is more loving: a God who creates a world in which love is possible, or a God who creates a world in which love is impossible? It seems reasonable that a loving God (if He exists at all), would create a world where love is possible. A good God would create a world where love can be experienced and expressed by creatures designed “in His image”. But this kind of “love-possible” a world is, by necessity, a dangerous place. Love requires freedom.
True love requires that humans have the ability to freely choose; love cannot be forced if it is to be heartfelt and real. I cannot force my children, for example, to love me. Instead, I must demonstrate my love for them, provide them with the knowledge and moral wisdom necessary to make safe and loving choices, and then allow them the personal freedom to love one another and do the right thing. Eventually, as a parent, I have to let go, and this process of letting go is dangerous. In order for my kids to have the freedom to love, they also need the freedom to hate. Freedom of this nature is often costly. A world in which people have the freedom to love and perform great acts of kindness is also a world in which people have the freedom to hate and commit great acts of evil. You cannot have one without the other, and we understand this intuitively.
http://coldcasechristianity.com/2017/why-would-a-good-god-allow-moral-evil/
The repentance is the ask for forgiveness, dude.
How is it that I know more about your religion than you?
No repentance means to turn away from!
You're the one who said the cake "represents" something...what that "something" is, you don't say. When asked to reference where in the Bible it ascribes a representation to the cake, you clam up. So that's why I think your faith is phony and insincere. God probably does too, if she exists.
That you ask such a question proves you have no knowledge.
My faith is insincere? I'd say your claims about what you can do with your investigative techniques are insincere. You make claims of what you can do then refuse to do it. You beg for information that if you could actually do what you say, you would have done it already. When given the location of where it can be done, you make excuses because you're a scared little pussy.
So what determines if the regret is sincere? How is that judged?
God knows!
So you are saying YOU did not have a choice?
How can you then claim that it is a choice?
I can tell you this...I cannot be turned on by a man. But even at my age, I can be turned on by a woman.
There are some people who CAN be turned on by others of the same sex.
What is your problem with that?
How can you say those feelings are not natural?
There are animals in the wild who feel them; there are porpoises and dolphins in the sea who do.
It is a lot more psychologically unhealthy to be as averse to the phenomena as you are...than to engage in homosexual activity.
I am saying it is hardwired into you, anything else is where the perversion of what God created comes in. you choose to go against what God created you to be by engaging in the sinful behavior! Murder is a sin If I say sorry that is how I was made will that wash, was I born a murderer or did I choose to kill someone?
You have cornered nothing, my faith in God is strong. I did not realize you were a homosexual, my arguments were not meant to harm but to enlighten. You do not have to believe for God to exist.
Your faith is insincere. I don't buy it, and neither does your God, if she exists.
Since regret based on the definition of the term repent. I spelled "repent" for you since you're too stupid to be able to do so. Look it up.
Repent, how?
You keep moving the goalposts, but you don't want to give the answer. The only "repentance" seems to be you talking to invisible sky fairies, which is what I said the extent of your penance would be.
You're not self-flagellating, you're not making sacrifices, so how are you repenting for the sins you regret?
Not, what. Who. You'll find out the moment you die when you're judged.
LOL!
That's convenient.
So you think you're sincere in your repentance? What makes you think that?
I don't have to. That's God's job.
That's a lazy answer from a lazy person.
You're the one claiming you have knowledge but proving you don't.
What knowledge am I claiming to have?
Get back to your boyfriend, faggot. He's waiting on you.
You sound like the dad in American Beauty who blew Kevin Spacey's brains out because he rejected his gay kiss.
Repent, how?
You keep moving the goalposts, but you don't want to give the answer. The only "repentance" seems to be you talking to invisible sky fairies, which is what I said the extent of your penance would be.
You're not self-flagellating, you're not making sacrifices, so how are you repenting for the sins you regret?
That's between you and God. I can't speak on behalf of anyone else. If you knew as much about the religion as you pretend, you would know that. I can't ask for forgiveness on your behalf just like I don't have to answer for you when you are judged by God.
LOL!
That's convenient.
So you think you're sincere in your repentance? What makes you think that?
Nothing to do with convenience but reality.
You shouldn't pretend to understand a religion when it's clear you have no clue.
That's a lazy answer from a lazy person.
It's not lazy when it's not your place to do something.
When you receive that welfare check having not done anything to earn it, it means you're lazy.
Think about it for a minute. Which is more loving: a God who creates a world in which love is possible, or a God who creates a world in which love is impossible? It seems reasonable that a loving God (if He exists at all), would create a world where love is possible. A good God would create a world where love can be experienced and expressed by creatures designed “in His image”. But this kind of “love-possible” a world is, by necessity, a dangerous place. Love requires freedom.
True love requires that humans have the ability to freely choose; love cannot be forced if it is to be heartfelt and real. I cannot force my children, for example, to love me. Instead, I must demonstrate my love for them, provide them with the knowledge and moral wisdom necessary to make safe and loving choices, and then allow them the personal freedom to love one another and do the right thing. Eventually, as a parent, I have to let go, and this process of letting go is dangerous. In order for my kids to have the freedom to love, they also need the freedom to hate. Freedom of this nature is often costly. A world in which people have the freedom to love and perform great acts of kindness is also a world in which people have the freedom to hate and commit great acts of evil. You cannot have one without the other, and we understand this intuitively.
http://coldcasechristianity.com/2017/why-would-a-good-god-allow-moral-evil/
Why would a God who loves you create pain for you?
God who creates a world in which love is impossible?
That's the God you worship; the one who won't let you love gay people because of your own sexual hangups.