The Smearing Of Brett Kavanaugh Is Truly Evil

christiefan915 said:
Keg City Club (Treasurer); 100 Kegs or Bust; Renate Alumnius; Devil's Triangle; Judge-Have You Boofed Yet? ...etc.

Nothing about National Honor Society or other references to his scholarship.

He didn't say "no sex until marriage", he said no sexual intercourse before marriage. There are other varieties of sex besides intercourse, like BJs for instance. He didn't exclude them by name, or any other type of sexual contact.

Sixty-five women signed a supporting letter yet one of those 65 was a woman whom Brett and his pals boasted she was their "conquest."

Kavanaugh may or may not be a reformed sleazebag but he wasn't so honorable as a student.
Click to expand...

Not according to Bill Clinton...."I did not have sexual relations with that woman"......
 
anatta said:
She recalled under psychotherapy? recovered is the buzz word. repressed is the psych term,
but the fact she was able to recall past the repression just shows trauma - it does not show she has an accurate memory.

I remember the guy. what does Creepy Porn Lawyer have to do with it? ( I forget any connection)
All I've seen is he directed Cohen to make the payments - hush money for a Non-Disclosure Agreement
isn't illegal and it's a common enough practive..

anyways.. enjoy the train,,isn't it exciting?
Click to expand...

Ford didn't recall her memories with therapy. She always remembered, she just didn't share those memories with anyone but her husband and therapist.
 
christiefan915 said:
Ford didn't recall her memories with therapy. She always remembered, she just didn't share those memories with anyone but her husband and therapist.
Click to expand...

....for 35 years.....it must have been REAL important. ::wink wink::

Morons on the left think they are fooling anyone into thinking they give a shit about women by supporting this nonsense. The TRUTH is that it is about butt hurt from not winning elections and not getting a leftist like Garland on the court.
 
Phantasmal said:
I need to see your proof she recovered this memory under psychotherapy, I have not read this in any account I have read. Thank you
Click to expand...

She didn't. She only shared her memories with the therapist and her husband. And she started with the therapist in 2012, way before all this blew up.
 
anatta said:
the people do not rule on a nomination. we have representatives for that.
There is no cause for a delay other than what was already given

The Biden rule wasn't originated by Republicans
Click to expand...

The Biden rule wasn't about waiting a year to select a Justice. It was about three or so months.

"Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate."
 
christiefan915 said:
The Biden rule wasn't about waiting a year to select a Justice. It was about three or so months.

"Republicans cited a 1992 speech by then-senator Joe Biden, arguing that if a Supreme Court seat became vacant during the summer, President Bush should wait until after the election to appoint a replacement, or else appoint a moderate acceptable to the then-Democratic Senate."
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if it is three months or six months snowflake; the point was made. No appointments should be presumed before an election year.
 
Stretch said:
I don't think either of the women are showing up Thursday.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you're very hopeful. I'm also sure that Dr. Ford will testify as scheduled. Unsure about the other(s). Probably your tarnished zero will be confirmed anyways. And your party of misogynist old white has-beens will suffer devastating losses in November.
 
Mason Margot said:
They took out the urinals,because these 11 chickenshits,squat to piss!
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I'm sure you're very hopeful. I'm also sure that Dr. Ford will testify as scheduled. Unsure about the other(s). Probably your tarnished zero will be confirmed anyways. And your party of misogynist old white has-beens will suffer devastating losses in November.
Click to expand...

:lolup:Believes the drunkard party whore. :rofl2:
 
Superfreak said:
There is no way to prove a negative you dolt. But based on what everyone who Ford stated was at the party have said... she doesn't know what she is talking about. Same for Ramirez who had to call people to ask them if it was Kavanaugh at the party.
Click to expand...

If Ford herself didn't give a specific date for the party, how can anyone else know if they were or weren't there?
 
Superfreak said:
No. But at the same time, the accuser needs to produce some credible evidence. At this time neither one has produced anyone that remembers what they are talking about.
Click to expand...

Any evidence will be produced on Thursday. Love the way you guys say there's no evidence, without any knowledge of what Ford will talk about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top