Why I don’t believe Fords story

Phantasmal said:
Real truth? The real truth is her story, I’m not sure what you mean by Real truth? She passed a polygraph.
Click to expand...
She passed a private polygraph...administered according to the "story" she told...which I'm sure she "believes".
So....
What's the Real truth? Why won't she testify on Monday?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
She's probably been advised that it's not a good thing to do; because she might inadvertently reveal who concocted this entire fabrication.
Click to expand...

Or she doesn't want to walk into a trap.

Have the FBi investigate, just like they did for Thomas/Hill.

What's the rush?
 
TOP said:
She passed a private polygraph...administered according to the "story" she told...which I'm sure she "believes".
So....
What's the Real truth? Why won't she testify on Monday?
Click to expand...

Look at those "hearings", Bart O'Kavanaugh lied his way through the entire theatrical production. So did Grassley; 3rd world banana republic shit show, and the entire world knows it.
 
TOP said:
She passed a private polygraph...administered according to the "story" she told...which I'm sure she "believes".
So....
What's the Real truth? Why won't she testify on Monday?
Click to expand...
Remember Anita Hill? I believe that is why. If you’ve read any stories, she didn’t want to be forever defined by this story as Anita Hill has been.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Since when does the FBI investigate an alleged incident that happened in HS, over 40 years ago.
Click to expand...

The FBI investigated the Catholic priests who molested kids over a period longer than that.

You're saying that investigation was illegitimate too?

Why do you want to protect priests who touch kids?

Why are you so pro-sexual assault?
 
LV426 said:
The FBI investigated Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill.

So the precedent already exists.

Why the rush to get Brettany on the bench? Because you want to protect Trump and the GOP from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation, right?
Click to expand...
There's no need for an FBI investigation....
 
Phantasmal said:
Remember Anita Hill? I believe that is why. If you’ve read any stories, she didn’t want to be forever defined by this story as Anita Hill has been.
Click to expand...

From what I've read, she was extremely reluctant to even go public on this in the 1st place.

I'm amazed how "easy" some here seem to think it is.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
SOS, she must be smeared. And they knew this was coming; they already had that "65 women support Bart O'Kavanaugh" letter waiting.
Click to expand...

65 is such a weird number to land on. Almost like they asked several times that number, but had to fudge it a bit to get "65 women" to go along with it.

I think all 65 of those women should be subpoenaed and forced to testify under oath when they were approached about signing onto that letter. And then I'd also subpoena all the women they approached who refused to sign onto that latter, and find out why they refused to do so.
 
TOP said:
There's no need for an FBI investigation....
Click to expand...

Sure there is.

They did one before in almost the exact same situation.

What are you so afraid of? Why the desperate rush to get Brettany on the bench? It's cause you need him to protect Trump and the GOP from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation, isn't it? That's why there's all this desperate urgency.
 
Phantasmal said:
Remember Anita Hill? I believe that is why. If you’ve read any stories, she didn’t want to be forever defined by this story as Anita Hill has been.
Click to expand...
This isn't the Hill story....She chose to share the "incident" and said she would go public....(Perhaps sending the letter wasn't the best decision. How was it Not going to go public?)
 
TOP said:
Then she can testify to that under oath on Monday.
But she's not cooperating. Why not?
Click to expand...

Because the FBI should investigate.

That way, a full, accurate, fair and truthful report can be issued, and the Senators can ask the witnesses about that.
 
LV426 said:
Sure there is.

They did one before in almost the exact same situation.

What are you so afraid of? Why the desperate rush to get Brettany on the bench? It's cause you need him to protect Trump and the GOP from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation, isn't it? That's why there's all this desperate urgency.
Click to expand...
There's no need for an investigation....she can testify on Monday and give her full, accurate, truthful account.
 
TOP said:
This isn't the Hill story....She chose to share the "incident" and said she would go public....(Perhaps sending the letter wasn't the best decision. How was it Not going to go public?)
Click to expand...

The FBI investigated prior to Hill testifying.

So why not do the same thing here? Thomas was eventually confirmed anyway...what are you so afraid of? Why the rush? I don't understand the urgency.
 
TOP said:
There's no need for an investigation....
Click to expand...

Yes there is. This is for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land.

An investigation will produce a fair, full, truthful report. And then the Senate Committee can call both Ford and Brettany to testify before them using the report the FBI does as the truthful baseline.

Why the rush to get Brettany confirmed? It's because you need him to protect Trump, isn't it? That's why you're so easily willing to sacrifice what little integrity you have by casting your lot in with that creep.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top