Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyer: It’s Not Her Job To Corroborate Her Story

Truth Detector said:
Once again; there is a presumption of innocence. That is the law of the land no matter how much you pathetic repugnant whiny leftist scum stomp your feet.
Click to expand...

Ahem:


ATTORNEY SENT LETTER TO CHUCK GRASSLEY AND DIANNE FEINSTEIN CLAIMING FEDERAL COURT EMPLOYEES WILLING TO SPEAK ABOUT BRETT KAVANAUGH
https://theintercept.com/2018/09/17...ssley-and-dianne-feinstein-neither-responded/

Committee were both approached in July by an attorney claiming to have information relevant to the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The attorney claimed in his letter that multiple employees of the federal judiciary would be willing to speak to investigators, but received no reply to multiple attempts to make contact, he told The Intercept.

Cyrus Sanai made his first attempt to reach out to Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., in a letter dated July 24.

Sanai told the committee leadership that “there are persons who work for, or who have worked for, the federal judiciary who have important stories to tell about disgraced former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and his mentee, current United States Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. I know that there are people who wish to speak out but fear retaliation because I have been contacted by more than a half-dozen such persons since Judge Kozinski resigned in disgrace.”
Click to expand...

The banana republic US Supreme Kangaroo Court
 
volsrock said:
Debra Katz, the attorney for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, said that it is not her client’s job to corroborate her claims.

Katz said on CNN on Monday that investigators should be responsible for proving Christine Blasey Ford’s claim that Kavanaugh held her down and drunkenly groped her while at a party in high school.

During the interview, Katz revealed that there was another girl present at the party, which allegedly took place in 1982 while Kavanaugh was attending Georgetown Prep. Ford previously told the Washington Post that there were four boys at the party but never indicated if there were other girls beside herself.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/kavanaugh-accuser-laywer-corroborate/

At first 4 boys were there, now it's a girl there

The waffling begins. Her concocted story is already falling apart.
Click to expand...

And here I thought it was innocent, until PROVEN GUILTY!!

My bad.

:facepalm:
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Someone needs to save his sorry ass, hope his daughters lock their doors at night. Or perhaps they've got that Don/Ivanka kinda thing, you know how those Aryans are about their pure bloodlines.
Click to expand...

Despicable; but then that is what you low life leftists have been reduced to. Whiny childlike rage.
 
Truth Detector said:
The senate is held to the same standard you brain dead retard. Good lord; stupid is too good a word for you.
Click to expand...

Oh, this senate?

THE TOP REPUBLICAN and Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee were both approached in July by an attorney claiming to have information relevant to the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The attorney claimed in his letter that multiple employees of the federal judiciary would be willing to speak to investigators, but received no reply to multiple attempts to make contact, he told The Intercept.

Cyrus Sanai made his first attempt to reach out to Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., in a letter dated July 24.

Sanai told the committee leadership that “there are persons who work for, or who have worked for, the federal judiciary who have important stories to tell about disgraced former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and his mentee, current United States Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. I know that there are people who wish to speak out but fear retaliation because I have been contacted by more than a half-dozen such persons since Judge Kozinski resigned in disgrace.”
Click to expand...

ATTORNEY SENT LETTER TO CHUCK GRASSLEY AND DIANNE FEINSTEIN CLAIMING FEDERAL COURT EMPLOYEES WILLING TO SPEAK ABOUT BRETT KAVANAUGH
https://theintercept.com/2018/09/17...ssley-and-dianne-feinstein-neither-responded/
 
Truth Detector said:
Polygraph tests are not admissible in a court of law due to their substantial unreliability.
Click to expand...

Why Polygraph Tests Are Not Admissible in Court

If you watch any TV show about true crimes or a drama, you’ll often see references to polygraph tests.

Given that the criminal justice system relies so heavily on people telling the truth, many people wonder why lie detectors are not used routinely in most cases.

However, in Texas as most states, polygraph results are not admissible in criminal trials.

Although polygraphs are also called lie detectors, in reality a polygraph machine does not have any reliable capacity for detecting the truth or falsity of a statement. The machines measure a person’s biological processes to determine if they are becoming stressed out during interrogations. Factors such as an increase in blood pressure or heart rate are measured. While these may be indicators that a person is lying, they may also simply indicate that a suspect is feeling pressurized by the interrogation even if they are telling the truth. Even if you ‘pass’ a polygraph test, it won’t help you in a criminal trial.

Can You Be Forced to Take a Polygraph Test?

Although police use polygraph tests less frequently than in the past, you might still be asked to take one after an arrest. Although psychological pressure may be provided by investigators, you do not have to take a polygraph test. Many people are not aware of their legal right to refuse.

If you refuse to take a polygraph test, some investigators may become more convinced that you are guilty. However, you are just asserting your legal rights and it won’t help you if you pass it, because the police may simply believe you have beat the test rather than being innocent.

This does not stop many investigators from requesting a lie detector test, often as part of a criminal investigation. There have been examples of interrogators seeking to convince defendants that the lie detector has shown results will be detrimental and they should confess.

Where Polygraph Tests Can be Used as Evidence

n Florida, California, Georgia and Nevada, polygraph tests can be used if everyone agrees to it but there are different opinions on the test’s accuracy. In California lawyers can present the results to the jurors and allow them to make up their minds. Georgia allows defendants who suffer due to a false result on a polygraph to sue the polygraph operator for damages. Florida is the only state that can require some defendants to take polygraph tests – previously convicted sex offenders in this case, although the test results can’t be used in court.

Defendants should always exercise care if they are asked to take a polygraph. You should never submit to an interview or a polygraph without first discussing your case with a Board Certified criminal defense lawyer.
 
TOP said:
What three people? She remembers them but not anything else? Not when, not where, not why and not what...No other details....and maybe mistaking him for someone else?
Click to expand...

They haven't been able to find 3 people who agree with her yet.

I'm sure money will be involved in getting them to agree though.

:facepalm:
 
floridafan said:
If he is innocent he should want to take a polygraph also, to prove his innocence.
Click to expand...

Why Polygraph Tests Are Not Admissible in Court

If you watch any TV show about true crimes or a drama, you’ll often see references to polygraph tests.

Given that the criminal justice system relies so heavily on people telling the truth, many people wonder why lie detectors are not used routinely in most cases.

However, in Texas as most states, polygraph results are not admissible in criminal trials.

Although polygraphs are also called lie detectors, in reality a polygraph machine does not have any reliable capacity for detecting the truth or falsity of a statement. The machines measure a person’s biological processes to determine if they are becoming stressed out during interrogations. Factors such as an increase in blood pressure or heart rate are measured. While these may be indicators that a person is lying, they may also simply indicate that a suspect is feeling pressurized by the interrogation even if they are telling the truth. Even if you ‘pass’ a polygraph test, it won’t help you in a criminal trial.

Can You Be Forced to Take a Polygraph Test?

Although police use polygraph tests less frequently than in the past, you might still be asked to take one after an arrest. Although psychological pressure may be provided by investigators, you do not have to take a polygraph test. Many people are not aware of their legal right to refuse.

If you refuse to take a polygraph test, some investigators may become more convinced that you are guilty. However, you are just asserting your legal rights and it won’t help you if you pass it, because the police may simply believe you have beat the test rather than being innocent.

This does not stop many investigators from requesting a lie detector test, often as part of a criminal investigation. There have been examples of interrogators seeking to convince defendants that the lie detector has shown results will be detrimental and they should confess.

Where Polygraph Tests Can be Used as Evidence

n Florida, California, Georgia and Nevada, polygraph tests can be used if everyone agrees to it but there are different opinions on the test’s accuracy. In California lawyers can present the results to the jurors and allow them to make up their minds. Georgia allows defendants who suffer due to a false result on a polygraph to sue the polygraph operator for damages. Florida is the only state that can require some defendants to take polygraph tests – previously convicted sex offenders in this case, although the test results can’t be used in court.

Defendants should always exercise care if they are asked to take a polygraph. You should never submit to an interview or a polygraph without first discussing your case with a Board Certified criminal defense lawyer.
 
Truth Detector said:
They are not entitled to falsely accuse people and destroy their livelihoods. I know that in banana republics this would be true; but until you morons on the left succeed in getting political power and turning us into one, that isn't how things are done.
Click to expand...

I can't wait to see the accusations that might come up, regarding ANY liberal looking for an appointment or to be voted into office.

:dealwithit:
 
volsrock said:
Debra Katz, the attorney for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, said that it is not her client’s job to corroborate her claims.

Katz said on CNN on Monday that investigators should be responsible for proving Christine Blasey Ford’s claim that Kavanaugh held her down and drunkenly groped her while at a party in high school.

During the interview, Katz revealed that there was another girl present at the party, which allegedly took place in 1982 while Kavanaugh was attending Georgetown Prep. Ford previously told the Washington Post that there were four boys at the party but never indicated if there were other girls beside herself.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/kavanaugh-accuser-laywer-corroborate/

At first 4 boys were there, now it's a girl there

The waffling begins. Her concocted story is already falling apart.
Click to expand...

that was a big nothing.
 
evince said:
who says he remembers

He has written books about this tim in his life

and heb says he was a black out drinker at the time

his buddy at the time was 100 kegs kavanaugh
Click to expand...

We get it, dumbshrub, you want to believe. Her story is unproven unless she went to the police when it happened and there's evidence to back up the claim. You must not fault Trump supporters when they do exactly what you're doing. I don't know why I'm bother with you anyway. you're the worst idiot I encounter anywhere on the internet
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top