Kavanaugh is about to get the Merick Garland treatment!

With 65 other gals fawning over him, why would he go for a girl wearing a one piece?

Yeah...about that...

Only two of the 65 women who vouched for Kavanaugh stand by him after accuser comes forward
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/two-65-women-vouched-kavanaugh-stand-accuser-comes-forward/

If it turns out that the GOP put people's names on this recommendation letter without their approval or knowledge, they should be investigated. In fact, the entire GOP/Trump nomination process needs to be dragged out into the open. Clearly, there was coordination among the GOP to forge (?) a letter to protect Kavanaugh ahead of any allegations made against him. So they knew of at least this incident ahead of time, and didn't bring it up in the hearing.
 
here's the deal, nut-bags

Kavanaugh is going to be confirmed, so ask yourself,
would it be better to confirm the man, or kick and scream and stoop to levels such as this, then he gets confirmed anyway.

why does your lives have to be so complicated, not getting your way doesn't mean you have to act stupid afterwards, there's gift in being humble.
the prayer of serenity is maybe the road to travel

Yeah...about that...

Only two of the 65 women who vouched for Kavanaugh stand by him after accuser comes forward
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/two-65-women-vouched-kavanaugh-stand-accuser-comes-forward/

If it turns out that the GOP put people's names on this recommendation letter without their approval or knowledge, they should be investigated. In fact, the entire GOP/Trump nomination process needs to be dragged out into the open. Clearly, there was coordination among the GOP to forge (?) a letter to protect Kavanaugh ahead of any allegations made against him. So they knew of at least this incident ahead of time, and didn't bring it up in the hearing.

omg ^^^^ :rofl2:

do you ever shut up
 
There is such knee-jerk on both sides.

Kav deserves the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. But the accuser deserves to be heard, and it's silly for those who just want to protect Kav to scream that she's a liar without any knowledge whatsoever.

my problem is the man has already been proven to LIE under oath


this women took a lie detector already and passed it
 
Kavanaugh is going to be confirmed

Looking less likely today than 72 hours ago.

It's not a foregone conclusion now.

If the vote is delayed at all before Thursday, the nomination is toast in time for the new session, and probably toast for good. He still needs to be voted out of committee, and the GOP only has an 11-10 advantage there. One defection kills it for good.
 
There is such knee-jerk on both sides.

Kav deserves the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. But the accuser deserves to be heard, and it's silly for those who just want to protect Kav to scream that she's a liar without any knowledge whatsoever.

She’s already been ‘heard’.

If I’m her lawyer and she’s given conflicting accounts my advice is to not appear before Congress lol. That’s bound to come up. All Kav needs to say is ‘I have no recollection of that’ which would be totally plausible.

Most people can perhaps accurately recount 3 vivid memories from 1982. That was a long time ago.
 
Payback is the prattle of little children. You lefties definitely fit that description.



Wrong again you low information dullard; the Democrats have always played this moronic game with Bork, then with Thomas. They also established the very precedent you foolishly whine about which is not nominating someone before an election. That came from YOUR side of the aisle you illiterate snowflake.



They aren't paying anything you ignorant twit. The Democratic Party of the Jackass is setting new low standards that when it comes time they are in power, cannot whine and complain when it is done to them. They are doing nothing here but embarrassing themselves in public. But you idiots think that is what winning is.



:lolup:Moron eruption in progress. :rofl2:

tenor.gif
 
There is such knee-jerk on both sides.

Ironic based on the knee jerking we see from you.

Kav deserves the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

How is that possible now snowflake? His named has already been smeared by the FAKE media and Democratic Party of the Jackass. How do you think anyone can walk this bullshit back?

You do know that this could have been brought up with the committee in private and they could have had confidential interviews with the accuser right?

But this isn't about the truth, or getting the facts out. This is about smearing a good person in front of his friends and family and crating enough doubt to sink his chance of nomination. Nothing more; and pretending that is, is nothing but pretentious bullshit.

But the accuser deserves to be heard,

Who is not letting her be heard??? Strawmen are all you and JarredHead ever bring to any argument.

....and it's silly for those who just want to protect Kav to scream that she's a liar without any knowledge whatsoever.

No one is screaming snowflake. It isn't about protecting Kav, that ended the minute the media portrayed his accuser as telling the truth and calling him a rapist.

Dishonesty seems to be your shtick. You and JarredHead. It is quite comical.
 
Thanks,

So the theory is that she read this, made up a story... went to a couples therapy session and gave made this up hoping the therapist would write it down, but neglected to get the name written down and then did not do anything else until now?

Wrong again; but then pontificating with lies and strawmen are all you lying leftists seem to have left.
 
Looking less likely today than 72 hours ago.

It's not a foregone conclusion now.

If the vote is delayed at all before Thursday, the nomination is toast in time for the new session, and probably toast for good. He still needs to be voted out of committee, and the GOP only has an 11-10 advantage there. One defection kills it for good.

Flake and Corker are both on the committee.
 
Yeah...about that...

Only two of the 65 women who vouched for Kavanaugh stand by him after accuser comes forward
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/two-65-women-vouched-kavanaugh-stand-accuser-comes-forward/

If it turns out that the GOP put people's names on this recommendation letter without their approval or knowledge, they should be investigated. In fact, the entire GOP/Trump nomination process needs to be dragged out into the open. Clearly, there was coordination among the GOP to forge (?) a letter to protect Kavanaugh ahead of any allegations made against him. So they knew of at least this incident ahead of time, and didn't bring it up in the hearing.

Delay, delay, delay...

:rofl2:
 
Thanks,

So the theory is that she read this, made up a story... went to a couples therapy session and gave made this up hoping the therapist would write it down, but neglected to get the name written down and then did not do anything else until now?

SO this is what you people who think she is lying believe?
 
would it be better to confirm the man, or kick and scream and stoop to levels such as this, then he gets confirmed anyway.

No guarantee he gets confirmed at this point. The committee vote is Thursday. The GOP only holds an 11-10 advantage there, and there are some waffley senators on that committee.


do you ever shut up

Kill yourself.
 
Yeah...about that...

Only two of the 65 women who vouched for Kavanaugh stand by him after accuser comes forward
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/two-65-women-vouched-kavanaugh-stand-accuser-comes-forward/

If it turns out that the GOP put people's names on this recommendation letter without their approval or knowledge, they should be investigated. In fact, the entire GOP/Trump nomination process needs to be dragged out into the open. Clearly, there was coordination among the GOP to forge (?) a letter to protect Kavanaugh ahead of any allegations made against him. So they knew of at least this incident ahead of time, and didn't bring it up in the hearing.

:lolup:Moron thinks the women who defend Kav should have come forward before they heard about the lying leftist harpy. :rofl2: Moron.
 
here's the deal, nut-bags

Kavanaugh is going to be confirmed, so ask yourself,
would it be better to confirm the man, or kick and scream and stoop to levels such as this, then he gets confirmed anyway.

why does your lives have to be so complicated, not getting your way doesn't mean you have to act stupid afterwards, there's gift in being humble.
the prayer of serenity is maybe the road to travel



omg ^^^^ :rofl2:

do you ever shut up

dear fucking idiot sociopath,


the truth is always better


this is the beginning of the next stage

setting out the facts for the American people to see so that if you confirm this lying asshole they will already be happy when the asshole is impeached and your republican party gets another nail in its coffin for forcing a lying asshole onto the highest bench for your unwanted policy ideas.


wouldn't it be better to just wait until after the election so you don't have to feel that awful embarrassment of him being kicked of all courts because hes a liar and a fraud?


the polls show the AMERICAN PEOPLE don't want this guy

even before this rape thing came out


fuck you very much
 
Payback is the prattle of little children. You lefties definitely fit that description.



Wrong again you low information dullard; the Democrats have always played this moronic game with Bork, then with Thomas. They also established the very precedent you foolishly whine about which is not nominating someone before an election. That came from YOUR side of the aisle you illiterate snowflake.



They aren't paying anything you ignorant twit. The Democratic Party of the Jackass is setting new low standards that when it comes time they are in power, cannot whine and complain when it is done to them. They are doing nothing here but embarrassing themselves in public. But you idiots think that is what winning is.



:lolup:Moron eruption in progress. :rofl2:


I accept your complete capitulation of the argument. Carry on whiny dullard. :rofl2:
 
She’s already been ‘heard’.

If I’m her lawyer and she’s given conflicting accounts my advice is to not appear before Congress lol. That’s bound to come up. All Kav needs to say is ‘I have no recollection of that’ which would be totally plausible.

Most people can perhaps accurately recount 3 vivid memories from 1982. That was a long time ago.

That's a pretty simplistic take.

If the accusations are serious, which they are, it should get a hearing in committee. Members can make up their own minds on the veracity without your biased recommendation.
 
Back
Top