This is f*cking embarrassing,

A

archives

Verified User
Trump/Putin press conference

Earlier when a reporter just Trump if he bought up Russia interference Trump skipped over the question and went into the usual dialogue on what a great victory he attained, and Putin added that he was unaware of anything but would look into it

Now, when asked if he believed the US intelligence agencies or Putin he went into a rant about Hillary's server. The next question if Trump would warn Putin not to do it again was also skirted over with a regurgitation on Hillary and the election. Putin pretty much concurred

Love to see how Fox is going to spin this debacle
 
Trump is a stark demonstration that the American system of governance and democracy has some very large and gaping holes in it.
 
archives said:
Trump/Putin press conference

Earlier when a reporter just Trump if he bought up Russia interference Trump skipped over the question and went into the usual dialogue on what a great victory he attained, and Putin added that he was unaware of anything but would look into it

Now, when asked if he believed the US intelligence agencies or Putin he went into a rant about Hillary's server. The next question if Trump would warn Putin not to do it again was also skirted over with a regurgitation on Hillary and the election. Putin pretty much concurred

Love to see how Fox is going to spin this debacle
Click to expand...

"Winning"
 
archives said:
Trump/Putin press conference

Earlier when a reporter just Trump if he bought up Russia interference Trump skipped over the question and went into the usual dialogue on what a great victory he attained, and Putin added that he was unaware of anything but would look into it

Now, when asked if he believed the US intelligence agencies or Putin he went into a rant about Hillary's server. The next question if Trump would warn Putin not to do it again was also skirted over with a regurgitation on Hillary and the election. Putin pretty much concurred

Love to see how Fox is going to spin this debacle
Click to expand...
Obama to Dmitri Medvedev on a hot mic "Tell Vladimir I'll have more flexibility after my election and if he gives me space know then I'll be able to offer more flexibility on missile defense etc.." (paraphrase) -- Libs have no problem.

Hillary to Putin *offers physical reset button to represent a reset in relations between the US and Russia with no consequences for Russian actions in Crimea, Syria, or around the world and nothing in return.* -- Libs have no problem.

Trump *two year investigation into potential collusion with Russia over election meddling with no evidence. Despite millions of taxpayers dollars tossed into it and billions of media dollars poured into it. Meets with Putin to discuss relations.* Libs freak out about the end of democracy and our president being a Russian stooge.

I believe this is called... hypocrisy.
 
Fox has it figured out, Trump was so interested in establishing a good relationship with Russia that he didn't want to jeopardize it by making it a big issue. And now they are moving on to "discuss" all the things that were accomplished

Not to worry, Trump is live on Hannity tonight to explain it all
 
AssHatZombie said:
Nope. It's working great. We don't want brainwashed globalists in charge.
Click to expand...

So what, exactly, is a "globalist" to you? Would a person with a large business enterprise that has branches and offices and property and employees in dozens of countries be considered a "globalist"? What about a person who sells products in America and other countries, and those products are not made here in the U.S. but in other countries? What about an American person who borrows money for his/her business not from U.S. lenders but from foreign banks? Are these ppl all globalists?
 
archives said:
Fox has it figured out, Trump was so interested in establishing a good relationship with Russia that he didn't want to jeopardize it by making it a big issue. And now they are moving on to "discuss" all the things that were accomplished

Not to worry, Trump is live on Hannity tonight to explain it all
Click to expand...

I bet he accomplished as much as the meeting with Kim did. LOLOL
 
United76America said:
Obama to Dmitri Medvedev on a hot mic "Tell Vladimir I'll have more flexibility after my election and if he gives me space know then I'll be able to offer more flexibility on missile defense etc.." (paraphrase) -- Libs have no problem.

Hillary to Putin *offers physical reset button to represent a reset in relations between the US and Russia with no consequences for Russian actions in Crimea, Syria, or around the world and nothing in return.* -- Libs have no problem.

Trump *two year investigation into potential collusion with Russia over election meddling with no evidence. Despite millions of taxpayers dollars tossed into it and billions of media dollars poured into it. Meets with Putin to discuss relations.* Libs freak out about the end of democracy and our president being a Russian stooge.

I believe this is called... hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

Ah, let me correct you there, it has been little over a year, and seems it you weren't paying attention last Friday, Mueller gave documented proof with "evidence"of Russian interference directly from Russian intelligence services, which an hour ago the Presisdent of the United States didn't think it was important enough to bring up when talking to the Russian President

And, in all of those old "whataboutisms" you cited, none of them involved a Russian espionage effort to sabotage our election system which defines us as a democracy. Not "hypocrisy," facts

Want to try again?
 
What is truly embarrassing is that any reporter would be stupid enough to expect the president to offend a nuclear super power that has always been very suspicious of us. If Reagan and Gorbachev hadn't become friendly the cold war most likely would have continued and the Soviet Union might not have collapsed. So Trump is following sound principles in dealing with a potential hostile nuclear nation.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
For some reason, archives believes that President Trump is "required" to respond to what ever is asked.
Click to expand...

No, "I" don't think it is required, but when you are representing the American people and meeting with a leader of a foreign nation, a nation has just been caught attempting to sabotage your democratic traditions, it would seem appropriate to make that fact an issue

Allowing Putin on the world stage to deny the facts is embarrassing
 
archives said:
Ah, let me correct you there, it has been little over a year, and seems it you weren't paying attention last Friday, Mueller gave documented proof with "evidence"of Russian interference directly from Russian intelligence services, which an hour ago the Presisdent of the United States didn't think it was important enough to bring up when talking to the Russian President

And, in all of those old "whataboutisms" you cited, none of them involved a Russian espionage effort to sabotage our election system which defines us as a democracy. Not "hypocrisy," facts

Want to try again?
Click to expand...

Muellers has been a little over a year. Congresses investigation has been 2. The medias has been over 2.

And it seems you were the one not paying attention. Because that announcement of Russian interference from Russian intelligence operatives also stated that no American citizens or anyone involved in the American election process were connected in any way to the Russian individuals. It also stated that jo votes were changed due to Russian interference. So collusion..? Nope.

And if you're so blinded by your bias that you do t think that Russia has tried to influence every American election since the USSR fell, then there's no helping you. There has always been Russian espionage against the US. You just never cared until CNN told you to.

The Russians have always tried to interfere in our elections. The left just didnt care until they realized it was their best excuse to explain why Trump won. Even though the real answer is that Hillary was the worst presidential candidate of all time, the DNC screwed Bernie, and Hillary never once visited Wisconsin or Michgan during the election cycle.

Its estimated that the Russians spent 11 mil trying to interfere with the election. The campaigns spent 1.5 billion combined. The media spent 8.2 billion. If you really think that 11.2 million from the Russians had a bigger impact than Hillary not visiting Michigan or Wisconsin, then I dont know what to tell you. Just keep believing the conspiracy theories if ignorance makes you feel better I guess..
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
So what, exactly, is a "globalist" to you? Would a person with a large business enterprise that has branches and offices and property and employees in dozens of countries be considered a "globalist"? What about a person who sells products in America and other countries, and those products are not made here in the U.S. but in other countries? What about an American person who borrows money for his/her business not from U.S. lenders but from foreign banks? Are these ppl all globalists?
Click to expand...

Globalist seek to structure the world such that the profits of banks and corporations are the paramount concern, regardless of the impacts on other people or other spheres of concern. They are hostile to national sovereignty in as much as it may impede them from their goals. They want open borders so they can,move people around and glut labor markets to suppress wages. They are hostile to most freedoms in the bill of rights, because they want to suppress opposition in all possible ways.
Bernie agreed with trump on bad trade deals and tpp. He was mistreated by the Corrupt Clinton machine accordingly.
Globalism is the mind virus of the day, most of them embracing the horrors of eugenics, population reduction, and general contempt for humanity itself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top