Why do you allow the lies?

No one has suggested that there is a "look what you made me do"

That is exactly what you suggested. You suggested these people bring their separation on themselves, even though separation doesn't need to occur and Trump is only doing it to inflict terror on children.

That's abuser behavior. Do you also beat your wife?

Oh, wait...

No way you're married.
 
No one has suggested that there is a "look what you made me do"; but instead it's condemnation of them continuing to make bad choices and expecting to be rewarded for those choices.

That is exactly "look what you made me do".

And the thing is, you don't even need to separate the families. You're doing it simply to instill terror in children and punish imaginary immigrants.
 
You poor pathetic moron:

This is not about border children or separation; this is about following our laws. This is not about a "policy", but about ENFORCING our laws. It is an asinine and false narrative the liberal left and FAKE media are engaging in.

The Homeland Security Act of 2002

The Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified in 6 U.S.C., created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), defined "unaccompanied alien child," and delegated the coordination and care of unaccompanied children to the Department of Health and Human Service (HHS). The Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), within HHS, operates about 100 short-term shelters throughout the United States for unaccompanied children. ORR recently opened temporary shelters to accommodate the increased detention of unaccompanied children. The temporary shelters are at Joint Base San Antonio Lackland (Texas), Naval Base Ventura County-Port Hueneme (California), and Fort Sill (Oklahoma).

Under the statute, HHS also is responsible for maintaining and publishing a list of legal services available to unaccompanied children, collecting statistical information on unaccompanied children, and reuniting children with their parents abroad if possible.


https://cliniclegal.org/resources/pr...grant-children

§236.3 Detention and release of juveniles.

(a) Juveniles. A juvenile is defined as an alien under the age of 18 years.

(b) Release. Juveniles for whom bond has been posted, for whom parole has been authorized, or who have been ordered released on recognizance, shall be released pursuant to the following guidelines:

(1) Juveniles shall be released, in order of preference, to:

(i) A parent;

(ii) Legal guardian; or

(iii) An adult relative (brother, sister, aunt, uncle, grandparent) who is not presently in Service detention, unless a determination is made that the detention of such juvenile is required to secure his or her timely appearance before the Service or the Immigration Court or to ensure the juvenile's safety or that of others. In cases where the parent, legal guardian, or adult relative resides at a location distant from where the juvenile is detained, he or she may secure release at a Service office located near the parent, legal guardian, or adult relative.

(2) If an individual specified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section cannot be located to accept custody of a juvenile, and the juvenile has identified a parent, legal guardian, or adult relative in Service detention, simultaneous release of the juvenile and the parent, legal guardian, or adult relative shall be evaluated on a discretionary case-by-case basis.

(3) In cases where the parent or legal guardian is in Service detention or outside the United States, the juvenile may be released to such person as is designated by the parent or legal guardian in a sworn affidavit, executed before an immigration officer or consular officer, as capable and willing to care for the juvenile's well-being. Such person must execute an agreement to care for the juvenile and to ensure the juvenile's presence at all future proceedings before the Service or an immigration judge.

(4) In unusual and compelling circumstances and in the discretion of the Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs, a juvenile may be released to an adult, other than those identified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii) of this section, who executes an agreement to care for the juvenile's well-being and to ensure the juvenile's presence at all future proceedings before the Service or an immigration judge.

(c) Juvenile coordinator. The case of a juvenile for whom detention is determined to be necessary should be referred to the “Juvenile Coordinator,” whose responsibilities should include, but not be limited to, finding suitable placement of the juvenile in a facility designated for the occupancy of juveniles. These may include juvenile facilities contracted by the Service, state or local juvenile facilities, or other appropriate agencies authorized to accommodate juveniles by the laws of the state or locality.

(d) Detention. In the case of a juvenile for whom detention is determined to be necessary, for such interim period of time as is required to locate suitable placement for the juvenile, whether such placement is under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, the juvenile may be temporarily held by Service authorities or placed in any Service detention facility having separate accommodations for juveniles.

(e) Refusal of release. If a parent of a juvenile detained by the Service can be located, and is otherwise suitable to receive custody of the juvenile, and the juvenile indicates a refusal to be released to his or her parent, the parent(s) shall be notified of the juvenile's refusal to be released to the parent(s), and they shall be afforded the opportunity to present their views to the district director, chief patrol agent, Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs or immigration judge before a custody determination is made.

(f) Notice to parent of application for relief. If a juvenile seeks release from detention, voluntary departure, parole, or any form of relief from removal, where it appears that the grant of such relief may effectively terminate some interest inherent in the parent-child relationship and/or the juvenile's rights and interests are adverse with those of the parent, and the parent is presently residing in the United States, the parent shall be given notice of the juvenile's application for relief, and shall be afforded an opportunity to present his or her views and assert his or her interest to the district director, Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs or immigration judge before a determination is made as to the merits of the request for relief.

(g) Voluntary departure. Each juvenile, apprehended in the immediate vicinity of the border, who resides permanently in Mexico or Canada, shall be informed, prior to presentation of the voluntary departure form or being allowed to withdraw his or her application for admission, that he or she may make a telephone call to a parent, close relative, a friend, or to an organization found on the free legal services list. A juvenile who does not reside in Mexico or Canada who is apprehended shall be provided access to a telephone and must in fact communicate either with a parent, adult relative, friend, or with an organization found on the free legal services list prior to presentation of the voluntary departure form. If such juvenile, of his or her own volition, asks to contact a consular officer, and does in fact make such contact, the requirements of this section are satisfied.

(h) Notice and request for disposition. When a juvenile alien is apprehended, he or she must be given a Form I-770, Notice of Rights and Disposition. If the juvenile is less than 14 years of age or unable to understand the notice, the notice shall be read and explained to the juvenile in a language he or she understands. In the event a juvenile who has requested a hearing pursuant to the notice subsequently decides to accept voluntary departure or is allowed to withdraw his or her application for admission, a new Form I-770 shall be given to, and signed by the juvenile.

[62 FR 10360, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 39258, June 7, 2002]

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-id...36_13&rgn=div8

OMFG.

That is "unaccompanied children", not children arriving with their families.

Thanks for proving my point that all you're doing is trying to conflate topics in the hopes you fatigue the conversation.

Well, I'm not a quitter like you, so it's not going to work.
 
They tackled the economy first because your policies destroyed it. Then they went to health care. After health care, they went to immigration, but at that point Conservatives had control of the House and obstructed it in the Senate.

You Nazi.

Since Obama had a majority in both houses, from January 2009 till November 2010, your trying to tell me that in 23 months they couldn't address the illegal immigration problem?

Seems to me that they were really incompetent, if you're saying they didn't have the time.
 
You poor pathetic moron: This is not about border children or separation

That is exactly what this is about. And what you provided here isn't the law that says children should be separated. The whole thing you posted is about unaccompanied juveniles, not kids arriving with their parents.

You're a liar and a fraud.
 
Republicans abandon Trump, demand end to zero-tolerance border policy

Congressional Republicans beat a full-scale retreat Monday from the administration’s zero-tolerance border policy, joining Democrats to demand that President Trump stop jailing parents and find ways to keep families together while trying to stop a new surge of illegal immigration.

High-profile Republicans said they are writing bills that would end family separations, and Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican, said he will no longer allow his National Guard troops to assist with border security as a protest against Mr. Trump’s policies.

Former first lady Laura Bush also weighed in, comparing family separations to internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

But Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said both President Obama and President George W. Bush — Mrs. Bush’s husband — both oversaw family separations at the border on their watch, too.

“Their rate was less than ours, but they absolutely did this,” she said.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders added that it was Mr. Bush who signed a key 2008 law that the administration blames for helping create the conditions that lead to family separation.

SEE ALSO: El Salvador says Trump violating human rights with border policy

The comments came as the administration tried to hold the line against a hostile press corps, rabid Democrats and increasingly skittish Republicans.

Ms. Nielsen called Democrats “cowardly” for refusing to work with Mr. Trump on solutions.

“Congress and the courts created this problem, and Congress alone can fix it,” she said.

She said answers offered by Democrats — releasing the families into the community, where most of them are unlikely to show up when it comes time for their hearings or deportation — amounts to to “open borders.”

Congressional Republicans, though, are abandoning the administration and stepping up with their own plans that would stop separations.

Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Republican, said he’s writing legislation that would double the number of immigration judges, vastly expand the amount of space detention space Homeland Security has to hold families, and push for faster decisions on asylum claims so people get quick answers and can either be released if they are deserving, or deported if they are rejected.

“While these cases are pending, families should stay together. Children belong with their mothers and fathers,” Mr. Cruz said.

Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, said he’ll revive a bill he wrote four years ago, back when the first surge of illegal immigrant children and families overwhelmed the Obama administration and sent Homeland Security scrambling to buy more detention beds for families.

Democrats at the time objected, and that refusal, combined with court rulings and a complex web of laws protecting some illegal immigrant children, has created the mess that’s ensued.

Nearly 70 children are being separated each day now, according to numbers released on Capitol Hill — up from fewer than 50 just weeks ago.

Separations happen for a number of reasons. Sometimes a parent is deemed abusive or a security risk, and other times an adult shows up trying to claim parentage of an unrelated child — sometimes the child was even abducted along the way so someone could pose as a family. There have been hundreds of those cases so far this year, Homeland Security says.

But the big change has been the Trump zero-tolerance policy. Border Patrol agents are now referring almost all illegal immigrants at the border for prosecution, and prosecutors are bringing cases against most of them.

Jumping the border has been a crime for decades, but the Bush and Obama administrations used the criminal penalties sparingly, instead treating illegal immigration through the civil side of the law and trying to deport people.

Over the last five years, though, migrants have figured out how to exploit that system, realizing they can get more lenient treatment if they arrive as families, and figuring that if they claim asylum, even with dubious cases, they can often get released into the U.S. where they can disappear into the shadows.

Unwilling to accept that outcome, the Trump administration said it would follow the laws and bring criminal charges. But that means parents who travel with children are getting jailed, and since jails can’t handle families, the children are taken and put into government-run dorms.

Some 2,342 children were separated between May 5 and June 9, Sen. Dianne Feinstein reported, citing Homeland Security numbers.

It’s likely that many of them have already been reunited with their parents, who served a few days in jail, but exact numbers are elusive.

Two new polls Monday found about two-thirds of Americans opposed to family separations, with Democrats adamantly opposed and Republicans more mixed.

In Washington, Democrats have blasted the Trump administration, saying it is using children as bargaining chips to try to win tougher border security and funding for the president’s wall.

“There’s no law requiring the separation of families. President Trump could end this immoral policy today. If he won’t, Congress must act,” said Ms. Feinstein, who has written a bill that would ban most family separations.

Key Democrats say their preferred solution is to release families from detention altogether, but give them counseling. They said a pilot program under Mr. Obama showed that was effective in getting people to show up for their court dates.

The Trump administration canceled that pilot, the Family Case Management Program, last year. Homeland Security didn’t respond to a request for comment on that decision.

Mr. Trump, for his part, said he won’t accept the border being overrun.

“The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility. It won’t be,” he said in brief remarks at the White House, where he again insisted the situation was ‘the Democrats’ fault.”

His aides fanned out across the country to make their case Monday.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Ms. Nielsen were in New Orleans addressing the National Sheriffs’ Association, where they said zero tolerance was the only choice for an administration intent on stopping illegal immigration.

Ms. Nielsen then flew back to Washington where she appeared at the White House to answer questions from a hostile press corps in an evening briefing.

“Is this not specifically child abuse?” demanded one CNN reporter.

Ms. Nielsen countered that the abuse came from parents who sent their children on the treacherous journey north to the U.S. border, braving rape, beatings, robbery and other dangers.

The secretary also said she was stunned by lawmakers who were telling her to stop enforcing the laws they passed making illegal immigration a crime.

“It’s a law passed by the United States Congress. Rather than fixing the law, Congress is asking those of his who enforce the law to turn our backs and not enforce the law,” she said. “That’s not an answer.”

Sen. Kamala Harris, a California Democrat eyeing a presidential run in 2020, said she’d heard enough. She called for Ms. Nielsen to resign.
 
Frank, you and your fellow traveler make fools of yourselves with your Nazi bullshit.

Nah. In this forum...the people making fools of themselves...are the poor deluded fools who continue to support that ignorant, abomination in the Oval Office.

The Nazi references are just attempts to remind you poor fools of what happened when Germany's poor fools fell lfor the bullshit of their abomination.
 
So illegal immigration wasn't important to them then; but it is now

They made a decision to save the economy you ruined, and then fix health care as much as they could. Immigration was next on the docket, but then you guys got control and decided to obstruct everything because you hate that a black man was President.
 
Republicans abandon Trump, demand end to zero-tolerance border policy

Congressional Republicans beat a full-scale retreat Monday from the administration’s zero-tolerance border policy, joining Democrats to demand that President Trump stop jailing parents and find ways to keep families together while trying to stop a new surge of illegal immigration.

High-profile Republicans said they are writing bills that would end family separations, and Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican, said he will no longer allow his National Guard troops to assist with border security as a protest against Mr. Trump’s policies.

Former first lady Laura Bush also weighed in, comparing family separations to internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

But Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said both President Obama and President George W. Bush — Mrs. Bush’s husband — both oversaw family separations at the border on their watch, too.

“Their rate was less than ours, but they absolutely did this,” she said.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders added that it was Mr. Bush who signed a key 2008 law that the administration blames for helping create the conditions that lead to family separation.

SEE ALSO: El Salvador says Trump violating human rights with border policy

The comments came as the administration tried to hold the line against a hostile press corps, rabid Democrats and increasingly skittish Republicans.

Ms. Nielsen called Democrats “cowardly” for refusing to work with Mr. Trump on solutions.

“Congress and the courts created this problem, and Congress alone can fix it,” she said.

She said answers offered by Democrats — releasing the families into the community, where most of them are unlikely to show up when it comes time for their hearings or deportation — amounts to to “open borders.”

Congressional Republicans, though, are abandoning the administration and stepping up with their own plans that would stop separations.

Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Republican, said he’s writing legislation that would double the number of immigration judges, vastly expand the amount of space detention space Homeland Security has to hold families, and push for faster decisions on asylum claims so people get quick answers and can either be released if they are deserving, or deported if they are rejected.

“While these cases are pending, families should stay together. Children belong with their mothers and fathers,” Mr. Cruz said.

Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, said he’ll revive a bill he wrote four years ago, back when the first surge of illegal immigrant children and families overwhelmed the Obama administration and sent Homeland Security scrambling to buy more detention beds for families.

Democrats at the time objected, and that refusal, combined with court rulings and a complex web of laws protecting some illegal immigrant children, has created the mess that’s ensued.

Nearly 70 children are being separated each day now, according to numbers released on Capitol Hill — up from fewer than 50 just weeks ago.

Separations happen for a number of reasons. Sometimes a parent is deemed abusive or a security risk, and other times an adult shows up trying to claim parentage of an unrelated child — sometimes the child was even abducted along the way so someone could pose as a family. There have been hundreds of those cases so far this year, Homeland Security says.

But the big change has been the Trump zero-tolerance policy. Border Patrol agents are now referring almost all illegal immigrants at the border for prosecution, and prosecutors are bringing cases against most of them.

Jumping the border has been a crime for decades, but the Bush and Obama administrations used the criminal penalties sparingly, instead treating illegal immigration through the civil side of the law and trying to deport people.

Over the last five years, though, migrants have figured out how to exploit that system, realizing they can get more lenient treatment if they arrive as families, and figuring that if they claim asylum, even with dubious cases, they can often get released into the U.S. where they can disappear into the shadows.

Unwilling to accept that outcome, the Trump administration said it would follow the laws and bring criminal charges. But that means parents who travel with children are getting jailed, and since jails can’t handle families, the children are taken and put into government-run dorms.

Some 2,342 children were separated between May 5 and June 9, Sen. Dianne Feinstein reported, citing Homeland Security numbers.

It’s likely that many of them have already been reunited with their parents, who served a few days in jail, but exact numbers are elusive.

Two new polls Monday found about two-thirds of Americans opposed to family separations, with Democrats adamantly opposed and Republicans more mixed.

In Washington, Democrats have blasted the Trump administration, saying it is using children as bargaining chips to try to win tougher border security and funding for the president’s wall.

“There’s no law requiring the separation of families. President Trump could end this immoral policy today. If he won’t, Congress must act,” said Ms. Feinstein, who has written a bill that would ban most family separations.

Key Democrats say their preferred solution is to release families from detention altogether, but give them counseling. They said a pilot program under Mr. Obama showed that was effective in getting people to show up for their court dates.

The Trump administration canceled that pilot, the Family Case Management Program, last year. Homeland Security didn’t respond to a request for comment on that decision.

Mr. Trump, for his part, said he won’t accept the border being overrun.

“The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility. It won’t be,” he said in brief remarks at the White House, where he again insisted the situation was ‘the Democrats’ fault.”

His aides fanned out across the country to make their case Monday.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Ms. Nielsen were in New Orleans addressing the National Sheriffs’ Association, where they said zero tolerance was the only choice for an administration intent on stopping illegal immigration.

Ms. Nielsen then flew back to Washington where she appeared at the White House to answer questions from a hostile press corps in an evening briefing.

“Is this not specifically child abuse?” demanded one CNN reporter.

Ms. Nielsen countered that the abuse came from parents who sent their children on the treacherous journey north to the U.S. border, braving rape, beatings, robbery and other dangers.

The secretary also said she was stunned by lawmakers who were telling her to stop enforcing the laws they passed making illegal immigration a crime.

“It’s a law passed by the United States Congress. Rather than fixing the law, Congress is asking those of his who enforce the law to turn our backs and not enforce the law,” she said. “That’s not an answer.”

Sen. Kamala Harris, a California Democrat eyeing a presidential run in 2020, said she’d heard enough. She called for Ms. Nielsen to resign.

Trump is a loser. Even members of his own party realize it. I wonder what it would take to get the fools who still support him here in JPP to realize it also.
 
Trump's family separation policy has Republicans starting to panic about 2018

One senior Republican operative, who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity to speak candidly about a hot-button topic, said the story was "hitting home."
"Worst of all, it's not just affecting border districts but suburban women as well," the operative added.
The Trump administration is facing wave of criticism from popular GOP figures over its separation of families. Former first lady Laura Bush wrote that the family separation policy is "cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart." Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, the nation's most popular governor, revoked his offer to send National Guard help to the southern border because "the federal government's current actions are resulting in the inhumane treatment of children."
Trump's former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci called it "an atrocious policy" on CNN Monday. "It's inhumane. It's offensive to the average American," he said.
Democrats have gone all-in to draw attention to the family separations. A Democratic delegation visited an immigrant detention center on Sunday, which was Father's Day, to highlight the issue. And California Sen. Kamala Harris called on Homeland Security secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to resign Monday.
A new CNN poll out Monday found that 67% of Americans oppose the separation of children from their parents, with 68% of independent voters disapproving of Trump's position. Among Republicans, however, 58% approve of the policy.
Colorado Rep. Mike Coffman, one of the nation's most endangered Republicans in this year's midterms, said in a statement he told Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Monday he wanted to "help her put a stop to this human rights disaster at the border" and was willing to introduce the California Democrat's bill to do so in the House.
"This isn't who we are," Coffman said. "My colleagues should mark their words and this moment -- history won't remember well those who support the continuation of this policy."
Still, for some Republicans, breaking with Trump has the potential to be politically perilous and many in Congress are trying to avoid it.
Some are blaming Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Others are lambasting a do-nothing Congress. And a few are dodging the questions entirely.
"Jeff Sessions could change this today," Texas Rep. Will Hurd, one of the most outspoken Republican critics of the Trump administration's policy, said on CNN Monday.
"Neither party should want to separate kids from their parents," California Rep. Jeff Denham, another endangered Republican, said on CNN hours later.
Their responses underscore the challenge facing the GOP in November's midterm elections: The party's base is still loyal to Trump and animated by the hardline anti-immigration platform he ran on. But the images of children separated from their parents and kept in cages near the border -- beyond humanitarian concerns -- are the makings of a political disaster just five months from election day.
Already, several Republicans have faced primary voters' wrath for breaking with Trump. South Carolina Rep. Mark Sanford was ousted in a primary last week. Alabama Rep. Martha Roby faces a runoff. And Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake decided to resign, saying he couldn't win a primary while standing for his principles and criticizing Trump.
Two years after immigration was the central theme of Trump's successful presidential campaign, the issue threatens to damage his party's chances now that the businessman-turned-politician is President.
Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley, who is challenging Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, picked up on Trump's talking point and blamed Democrats -- without addressing the reality that the family separations are the result of a Trump administration policy and without taking a position on the policy.
"The whole immigration system is a disaster, and Claire McCaskill should answer for that: she's been in D.C. for over a decade and she has shown zero leadership to secure the border, stop sanctuary cities, or protect American workers," Hawley said in a statement. "Nobody wants to see children and parents separated, just like no one should want to see illegal drugs and gangs pouring across our border. But none of that will change until McCaskill and the D.C. crowd take some responsibility and build the wall and secure the border."
Some Republicans in competitive races this fall broke with Trump on the policy but didn't directly blame the President, instead choosing to vaguely blame Washington or Congress.
"I do not favor separating families. Washington is to blame for this by being all talk and no action, and the solution is to secure the border," Florida Gov. Rick Scott, who is challenging Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson, said in a statement.
Megan Taylor, a spokeswoman for Nevada Republican Sen. Dean Heller, said: "Senator Heller doesn't support separating children from their families, and he believes that this issue highlights just how broken our immigration system is and why Congress must act to fix it."
Denham's district in the Central Valley of California is a Democratic target in November. His opponent, Josh Harder, called him "Do-Nothing Denham" in a statement Monday.
"I have no doubt Trump and Denham's lack of leadership on immigration spell deuces for Republicans in the midterm elections, especially in a district like ours, with over 40% registered Latino voters," Harder said.
 
Since Obama had a majority in both houses, from January 2009 till November 2010, your trying to tell me that in 23 months they couldn't address the illegal immigration problem?

Recovering the economy and affordable health care were their priorities.

Immigration was next, but you guys obstructed that.

Why?
 
Back
Top