There is no Korean war, Trumpkins.

Controlled Opposition said:
Jade, you know damn well that if Hillary was president, you would take exactly the opposite position. And. we are at war with several countries. We drop about 121 Christian Love Bombs a day on brown people.
Click to expand...

No, actually I wouldn't. We're not at war with N.Korea, or Iran, but the definition you're going for would mean we are. There is no declared war in the Korea's right now.
 
Jade Dragon said:
No what's there is a conflict, war involves direct battle. By your definition we'd be at war with a few countries
Click to expand...

THEY ARE AT WAR, UNTIL THEY SIGN A PEACE TREATY.

NO PEACE TREATY WAS EVER SIGNED, BETWEEN THEM.

Maybe you'll understand if it's large enough for you to read. :palm:
 
Cypress said:
It is all about optics folks.

That has been Trump's gig for his entire life.

He considers good optics to be a success.

This dim witted pig is not capable of effective diplomacy, he is unprepared, and uninformed. He ripped up a working international agreement with Iran simply because he hated Barack Obama, and the optics of doing so would look good to his degenerate, boot licking base of support.

The Orange Pig is going for some good optics on Korea. He has no capability - zero, nada, zilch - to play the shrewd and cunning international diplomat.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Jade Dragon said:
No, actually I wouldn't. We're not at war with N.Korea, or Iran, but the definition you're going for would mean we are. There is no declared war in the Korea's right now.
Click to expand...

Tell the Pope lol.

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Francis said on Sunday he hoped a forthcoming summit in Singapore between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un will lead to peace for Korea.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...hat-korea-summit-leads-to-peace-idUSKBN1J60HQ
 
Lets see if these numbers ring any bells: June 25, 1950 – July 27, 1953

Hopefully the spreading infection of Trump dumbassery ceases soon. Thank God the majority of people are immune, unfortunately being full of shit will make many more susceptible.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
THEY ARE AT WAR, UNTIL THEY SIGN A PEACE TREATY.

NO PEACE TREATY WAS EVER SIGNED, BETWEEN THEM.

Maybe you'll understand if it's large enough for you to read. :palm:
Click to expand...

An armistice is a Formal Agreement of warring parties to stop fighting. Stopping fighting, is ending a war. It merely lacks the paperwork.Maybe you can have someone explain Engish to you? You have a serious anger issue.
 
Nordberg said:
An armistice is a Formal Agreement of warring parties to stop fighting. Stopping fighting, is ending a war. It merely lacks the paperwork.Maybe you can have someone explain Engish to you? You have a serious anger issue.
Click to expand...

Most Trumpkins are black belts in flouncing. I believe it's bull style, but some also excel at Yorkie style (AKA little bitch style)
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Two nations with their fingers on the triggers for 70 years, each ready to annihilate the other, is a war.
Click to expand...

Odd. We sold NK nuclear reactors a mere 2 years before we placed them on an axis of evil list. Utterly bipartisan deal, initiated under Clinton and wrapped up under Bush. Sold from a company Rumsfeld had once sat on the baord of directors of, and under Bush, we eventually ponied up US taxpayer funding to assist NK in completeing the deal. True story, folks can dig into it if that like, or not, but that's what we did.

Then there's this:

The $10 trillion mineral resources North Korea can't tap
http://www.mining.com/web/the-10-trillion-mineral-resources-north-korea-cant-tap/

And then there's our version of capitalism married to militarism.
 
Jade Dragon said:
No, actually I wouldn't. We're not at war with N.Korea, or Iran, but the definition you're going for would mean we are. There is no declared war in the Korea's right now.
Click to expand...

There is no declared war in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Niger.... but we bomb them anyway. We haven't been in a declared war since 1945. So why do you think we have all of those troops and all of that military equipment in South Korea?
 
Clinton administration officials about the legal status of U.S. operations in Serbia and Kosovo.

Campbell asked Secretary of State Albright:“Well, if this isn’t war, what is it?”And she said, “It’s an armed conflict.” So I asked [Assistant] Secretary [of State Barbara] Larkin, “Well,what’s the difference?” She couldn’t tell me, but she said her attorney would. So the attorney finally said,“It becomes war when you call it war.”
 
noise said:
Clinton administration officials about the legal status of U.S. operations in Serbia and Kosovo.

Campbell asked Secretary of State Albright:“Well, if this isn’t war, what is it?”And she said, “It’s an armed conflict.” So I asked [Assistant] Secretary [of State Barbara] Larkin, “Well,what’s the difference?” She couldn’t tell me, but she said her attorney would. So the attorney finally said,“It becomes war when you call it war.”
Click to expand...

A nation of laws, no doubt.

More from Maddie on half a million Iraqi children dead:

 
Kinetic Military Action
Rich Galen
By Rich Galen | March 25, 2011 | 4:44 AM EDT

There has been so much going on this week, it's almost impossible to make sense of it all in just one column.

First of all, there is the ongoing non-war in Libya. It is a non-war in which no country appears to want to take control.

President Obama has made it clear that the United States will NOT be the lead dog on this sled, but that it would be a NATO operation. Neither France nor Turkey -- both NATO members -- agree with Obama and don't want NATO to be in charge, and it is not.

According to the Bloomberg news service: “The allies are considering a proposal, backed by France, to create a political steering committee that would oversee military operations using NATO's command structure. It would consist of the 12 nations that have committed to participating.”

Oh, yeah. That will work. Why don't they just let the U.N. General Assembly run this thing?...

The Obama Administration has apparently redefined the word "war" so that only kinetic military action using troops on the ground counts.

That is at odds with the Merriam-Webster Third Unabridged: "A state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between political units (as states or nations)"

I think that definition fits what's going on in Libya.
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/rich-galen/kinetic-military-action
 
Truth Detector said:
Three months ago Whiny lying leftists were bitching about Trump starting WWIII. Now, suddenly N. Korea is no threat.

You lying hypocrites can't remember what you said yesterday, let alone a month ago.


Do you whiny, pathetic, brain dead leftists ever get tired of being wrong about everything? That was rhetorical.
Click to expand...
:truestory::trumpdance:
 
Controlled Opposition said:
There is no declared war in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Niger.... but we bomb them anyway. We haven't been in a declared war since 1945. So why do you think we have all of those troops and all of that military equipment in South Korea?
Click to expand...

The Gulf war, Iraq war, Afghanistan war. We were also part of the Vietnam war. All the bombing is part of what America dubs the war on terror, an excuse for America to butt in on most world conflicts, especially in the middle east.

P.S. Next time don't declare what I would think, or do. That's asinine, and the reason I felt the need to groan your post. Why would I feel differently about this if Hillary was in? She would never be daft enough to call it the Korean war, and I wouldn't be praising if she ended the conflict, like it was one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top