trump Crashes the DOW

So what was the number on January 20th, 2017?




Food stamp usage declined to what level by 2017? Obama didn't stop being President in 2013, you know.





Gee, then we should probably raise wages. But you oppose raising wages. Hence your argument is masturbation.

You complain about people whose income qualifies them for assistance programs.
You oppose raising the minimum wage, which would reduce the number who qualify for assistance programs.
So you are arguing against the only thing that can solve the thing you're also complaining about.

That's a circle jerk of rhetoric, and you're voluntarily eating the cracker.

The claim that the economy was better was made at the same time food stamp use was setting records. Those two don't go together except for NL like you that are willing to kiss Obama's ass for any reason.

I'm not opposed to raising wages. I support wages being raised when the person that gets the raise earns it. You support handing them more but have yet to say what the person will have to do to EARN it.
 
The claim that the economy was better was made at the same time food stamp use was setting records. Those two don't go together except for NL like you that are willing to kiss Obama's ass for any reason.

I'm not opposed to raising wages. I support wages being raised when the person that gets the raise earns it. You support handing them more but have yet to say what the person will have to do to EARN it.


You are sleazy scum
 
Her prediction was made using the CBO score unless you're willing to admit she reached in Obama's ass and pulled out something random.

NO IT FUCKING WASN'T YOU STUPID ASSHOLE.

She made the prediction before the CBO scored the bill. The bill wasn't even written when Romer made her prediction.

You keep fucking yourself up on the timeline.

Please show me the CBO score that was done on the Stimulus before it was written, before it was introduced in the House, before Obama was elected.

I'll wait.
 
Yet you refuse to show after having been given directions. Interesting how you claim to be able to do something then refuse to try and do it.

Regardless of what would happen in our hypothetical "meet up", one thing's for sure; you'll be doxxed. So you challenging someone on a message board to a physical meeting will only result in your true identity being exposed on this and other forums.

That's probably the last thing you want to have happen because it would expose you as a liar, poser, and exaggerator.
 
We have; there are less taxes taken out of my paycheck now. How does that reconcile your moronic rant moronically claiming the effects should be IMMEDIATE dumbass?

OMG...

Because you just said it immediately showed up in your paycheck. So you got your tax cut, as well as everyone else. So now what? How is the 4-5% growth supposed to happen?
 
Lying again I see....when did "I think" become "I predict?" You're just a brain dead parrot of leftist talking points.

Larry Kudlow said that growth would be 4-5%. Paul Ryan said they'd feel it in their paychecks by February at the latest. Tax cuts need time to work? How so? The tax cut already happened...there's nothing more to do.



PRESIDENT TRUMP: This is going to be one of the great gifts to the middle-income people that they've ever gotten for Chrismas...


Christmas 2017. It's June 2018 today. Economic growth slowed by 0.7% once the tax cut took effect. You all promised 4-5% growth.

So you made a bad prediction.
 
Years from now they can make it even more generous if we can get the economy like it should be. The economy now is at 3%. Nobody thought it would be anywhere close. I think it could go to 4, 5, and maybe even 6%, ultimately. Each percentage point is $2.5 trillion. We are back. We are really going to start to rock. We need this as our final push and you're going to see some numbers that are really great. You're going to see great jobs numbers. Jobs are going to come pouring back into this country, which we need very much. [/size][/i]

Wait, wait, wait...so we need to do more tax cuts?????

BTW - GDP growth declined by 0.7% in the first quarter of the tax cuts.
 
So now your story changes to "so what?" Being an obvious lying buffoon seems to come naturally to you snowflake.

I didn't change my story at all; you did. I said Romer's prediction from before Obama was sworn in was wrong. But I'm trying to find out why you think it's significant. You haven't really said. And besides, it doesn't matter since Obama recovered all the jobs lost and added 11 million more while cutting the black unemployment by more than half. Which you had to admit, very painfully.
 
There you go again with the pathological lying. No one "predicted" that. But I am sure you can find a LINK to this "prediction" right pathological lying snowflake? Or will you walk that one back to "so what" as well? :rofl2:

YOU QUOTED TRUMP HIMSELF SAYING THAT RIGHT HERE:

I think it could go to 4, 5, and maybe even 6%

And here's Trump's Economic Adviser, Larry Kudlow saying that:

Larry Kudlow predicts 4%-5% growth, 'investment boom'

That's from the Washington Examiner, which is a source you've used countless times.

Growth for Q1 2018 was 2.2%.

A far cry from the 4% Kudlow was telling everyone we'd get.
 
But anyone with a brain would know that expecting instant results from tax policy is....well just plain moronic.

Why would't they be instant? The tax cut was instant. Explain why it takes time for a tax cut to work when the effects of the tax cut are instant? The taxes in your paycheck isn't gradually reduced to the amount the tax cut did, it was immediately reduced. We were told we'd see it in our paychecks no later than February.

So explain why it takes time for a tax cut to work using economic theory.

I'll wait.

BTW - when Brownback passed nearly identical tax cuts in Kansas, he said it would be "a shot of adrenaline" into the economy. What kind of adrenaline doesn't start working right away? We've all seen Pulp Fiction...
 
Selective nitpicking; yes, the snowflake is a dishonest dunce. :rofl2: Snowflake: "It's not fair to include all eight years." :rofl2:

Sounds like you're the one whining here. Trump's growth last quarter was exactly the same as the average growth over Obama's last four years.

Ouch.
 
Moron still believes that tax policy has immediate effects no matter how stupid that is or how moronic is sounds. :rofl2:

Explain why an immediate cut in taxes wouldn't produce immediate economic growth?

If cutting taxes means people have more money to spend, why wouldn't they start spending once they got their tax cut?

I'll wait for your answer....
 
Back
Top