trump Crashes the DOW

[Truth Detector]

Looks like you got triggered. Don't shoot up a crowd like the other triggered Nazis.

Triggered snowflake now calling me a nazi. Liberals are so predictably stupid.

 

[Truth Detector]

So what? So he was wrong, but eventually the unemployment rate did get below 8% two years after the Stimulus, which was still in effect in 2012.

So now your story changes to "so what?" Being an obvious lying buffoon seems to come naturally to you snowflake.

You guys predicted 4-5% growth from the Russia Tax Cut. Where's that scrutiny?

There you go again with the pathological lying. No one "predicted" that. But I am sure you can find a LINK to this "prediction" right pathological lying snowflake? Or will you walk that one back to "so what" as well?

Oh right, we need to give the Russia Tax Cut X amount of time to work.

You don't have to wait to make your remarkable stupid predictions. But anyone with a brain would know that expecting instant results from tax policy is....well just plain moronic.

Unlike Obama getting unemployment below 8%, you will never get growth that high.

Yep, unlike Obama, Trumps unemployment levels are at record lows. I would guess that they will never be as bad or as pathetic as Obama's low wage anemic economy.

You're too stupid to comprehend how moronic you look.

 

[Truth Detector]

That Nazi is so fuckjng confused.

Snowflake triggered!!

He can't celebrate Trump's black unemployment rate without admitting it was Obama that got him there.

He acknowledged that Obama cut the black unemployment rate by more than 50% after 8 years, which he knows means Trump is just riding on the work Obama did.

It's like Obama hit a triple, was lifted for pinch-runner Trump, who then pretends he's the one who hit the triple and it should show up in his stats.

Translation:

 

[Truth Detector]

Obama averaged 2.2% growth during his second term.

Selective nitpicking; yes, the snowflake is a dishonest dunce. Snowflake: "It's not fair to include all eight years."

Q1 2018 GDP was 2.2%.

Selective nitpicking; yes, the snowflake is a dishonest dunce. Snowflake: "It's not fair to include all eight years."

So that means that Trump's economic policy of the Russia Tax Cut wasn't good policy either.

What your posts mean is that you're a buffoonish dunce on steroids who cannot be taken seriously.

See, if you guys had delivered on the promises made of your Russia Tax Cut, you could attack Obama.

But you can't, because your Russia Tax Cut is a massive failure.

Moron still believes that tax policy has immediate effects no matter how stupid that is or how moronic is sounds.

Yep, you cannot lead a brain dead Party of the Jackass dumbfuck to the obvious.

 

[Truth Detector]

You guys borrowed $1.5T with your Russia Tax Cut and economic growth last quarter -a full three months under the new Russia Tax Scam- was 2.2% - which is what it was during Obama's second term.

That's another moronic lie. The tax cut implications do not go into effect until next year. The fiscal year runs from October–September you incoherent uneducated dolt.

I don't have a problem borrowing money if we have something to show for it; like a recovered economy, new roads, 11 million jobs, health care, etc.

Of course you don't; you're a clueless dolt that thinks Government can stimulate economic growth by spending gobs of money it doesn't have.

But your shitty tax cut won't do any of that. In fact, all your shitty tax cut has done is explode the deficit back to $1T, slowed economic growth by 0.7%, kicked 4 million people off insurance, and have lost 300 points on the DJIA.

Awwww....angry snowflake is triggered when Americans get to keep more of what they earn. I can't say I am surprised. Yep, in liberal loony land, it is shitty when the Government doesn't get to confiscate more.

#winning by #losing...just like this Presidency.

Moron still thinks the Democratic Party of the Jackass is winning.

 

[Truth Detector]

Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
The notion that the Government can spend trillions it does not have to boost an economy in malaise ignores the FACT that the Government produces NOTHING; therefore, at some point the money has to be pulled OUT of the economy to pay for the spending.

This is completely, 100% wrong and if you took any economics class in your life, you'd know that.

It is absolutely 100% correct. You're too stupid to comprehend how ignorant and uneducated you are to comprehend the obvious.

Yep, in brain dead loony liberal land, Government can just BORROW and spend and the economy will BOOM!

 

[Truth Detector]

At one point this year, the DOW was down 600 points since the Russia Tax Cut.

Useless moron thinks the tax cuts caused the DOW to drop.

Fact is the Russia Tax Cut didn't deliver on any of the promises made of it, like everything Conservatives say and do.

Useless moron thinks the tax cuts will have an immediate impact.

 

[Truth Detector]

You're the ones who were saying we'd see it as late as February of this year.

LINK us up lying dumbfuck.

Tomorrow's June.

No shit Sherlock!!

Why would the Russia Tax Cut need time to work if it showed up in everyone's paycheck by February? Why wouldn't it work then?

Useless moron insists that tax cuts should have an immediate effect before they are fully implemented.

The answer is that it will never work, and you were conned.

Useless moron making stupid predictions and when he is proven wrong, will pretend he never made them. But you do love to make shit up dumbfuck.

 

[Truth Detector]

The DOW is down over 2000 points this year, and that even included the tax cut. Just think how badly it would be doing if there had been no tax cut. Its 6 months into the year and nothing is happening. Even worse, a trade war will make things far worse.

No it isn't; and you're a useless ass clown making such retarded and moronic claims. That's why it is best to just point at your glaring ignorance and laugh. Taking you serious would require one to be retarded.

 

[Truth Detector]

It's only bullshit to you because it ruins your narrative.

Wrong again assclown; it's bullshit because you make it up and then pretend you know what you are talking about. Your misplaced condescension paints you as an idiot on steroids.

Bush's own people said the cause of the collapse was the dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for subprime loans beginning in 2004.

Irony; a whiny ignorant snowflake who hates all things Bush now demanding that we believe what Bush says. You really are too stupid to comprehend the obvious snowflake.

 

[Truth Detector]

407 pages in Congressional margins.

Which is about 150 pages in normal margins.

I know that you can't read 150 pages in 6 days, but some people can read that in an afternoon.

Moron still believes that a bill like the ARRA only took five days to write.

If that were the case, it would be another reason Democrats are such morons and the bill was such a failure. Much like Obamacare was.

Another of those brain dead clueless "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It" moments. Can you imagine if a republican said this about some major legislation???

"We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It"

 

[CFM]

Stimulus and good economic policy.

So now you're admitting that Obama did in fact add jobs and did in fact get the unemployment rate down.

So why were you arguing that he didn't?

Oh right, you were trying to apply a prediction made by Romer before Obama was President, to the stimulus. And you did that because you're desperate to go after Obama so you don't have to defend Trump.

What a lazy fucking fraud.

That's your claim. You've been provided where and how to get there. You've even said what you would do. Now, if you say no, it's you that is a lazy fucking fraud.

I expected that's what you would claim about Obama. The question was bait to get you to prove you're willing to lie on his behalf. Thanks for proving what I already knew about you.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Yes you did, boy wonder.

You said it took Obama 8 years to cut the black unemployment rate in half.

So you acknowledge that he cut it in half, which means that he set up Trump with the work he did.

FFS. You're not much of a thinker, are you?

you'll have to link me saying Obama cut black employment in half......I think you're imagining things......

 

[CFM]

No, those people were added because of the economic collapsed caused by your shitty policies. As Obama added jobs, people began falling off SNAP.

The 47.6 million wasn't reached until 2013 during Obama's second term.

The numbers, if you have the guts to truly look at them, say otherwise. The administration was claiming jobs were being created and unemployment going down at the same time food stamp use was going up.

Direct payments to individuals as a share of GDP was at a higher percentage under Obama than Presidents all the way back to Carter.

 

[CFM]

You're the one making all these wild claims about your station in life. I think you're just pretending because it's how you keep up your self-esteem. You know there's no way to verify anything you say about yourself, so you invent given circumstances in order to cast yourself in the best possible light.

Weak sauce.

There is a way. You refused and proved yourself a coward when given the way.

I-85 N from Atlanta for 275 miles. Your choice to be a man or show everyone you're a coward.

 

[The Derp]

That's your claim. You've been provided where and how to get there. You've even said what you would do. Now, if you say no, it's you that is a lazy fucking fraud.

Language isn't your friend, is it?

It was good economic policy, and that's what the CBO concluded after the stimulus.

 

[The Derp]

I expected that's what you would claim about Obama. The question was bait to get you to prove you're willing to lie on his behalf. Thanks for proving what I already knew about you.

I haven't lied about anything. I am using the CBO's analysis of the Stimulus that proves it was good policy, creating up to 3.3 million jobs.

 

[The Derp]

you'll have to link me saying Obama cut black employment in half......I think you're imagining things......

You acknowledged it here, genius:

well, for one thing he hasn't been a president for seven years yet.....

Which was in response to this:

Not at all.

Obama reduced Black Unemployment from 16.8% in March 2010 to 7.8% by January 2017.

That's a 50%+ reduction.

Trump's reduced it from 7.8% to 6.6%, which is a 15% reduction.

How come Trump hasn't reduced it by 50%? Obama did.

So you admit that in 7 1/2 years, Obama reduced black unemployment from 16.8% in March 2010 down to 7.8% by January 2017.

Again, you don't really have the mental capacity to understand what you did. It was a total and complete unforced error on your part.

 

[The Derp]

If you earn a low wage, it's because you offer low skills.

No, it's not because the skill required to do a job at Costco pays $18/hr and the same skill required to do a job at Walmart pays $10/hr.

So what's the true value of the skill? You're the one saying that low wage translates to low skill, however the skill is the same for the job that pays $18/hr at Costco vs. $10/hr at Walmart.

So skill level has nothing to do with it, obviously, since Costco's wage is 80% higher than Walmart's for the same job.

To have fewer people on SNAP, stop enabling low skilled people to be freeloaders.

So you want to just kick people off SNAP. Because presumably you want people to starve, particularly children and veterans since they make up the majority of SNAP recipients.

So this goes back to the other thread about abortion; you love fetuses in the womb, but completely hate them once they are born.

 

[The Derp]

The 47.6 million wasn't reached until 2013 during Obama's second term.

So what was the number on January 20th, 2017?

The numbers, if you have the guts to truly look at them, say otherwise. The administration was claiming jobs were being created and unemployment going down at the same time food stamp use was going up.

Food stamp usage declined to what level by 2017? Obama didn't stop being President in 2013, you know.

Direct payments to individuals as a share of GDP was at a higher percentage under Obama than Presidents all the way back to Carter.

Gee, then we should probably raise wages. But you oppose raising wages. Hence your argument is masturbation.

You complain about people whose income qualifies them for assistance programs.
You oppose raising the minimum wage, which would reduce the number who qualify for assistance programs.
So you are arguing against the only thing that can solve the thing you're also complaining about.

That's a circle jerk of rhetoric, and you're voluntarily eating the cracker.