Giuliani says Mueller won't indict the president

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
Rudy Giuliani told Fox News on Wednesday that special counsel Robert Mueller has told the president's legal team he will follow Justice Department guidance and not seek an indictment against Trump.


trumpdonald_muellerrobert_050118getty.jpg



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/16/mueller-told-trumps-legal-team-will-not-indict-president-giuliani-tells-fox-news.html
 
Rudy Giuliani told Fox News on Wednesday that special counsel Robert Mueller has told the president's legal team he will follow Justice Department guidance and not seek an indictment against Trump.


trumpdonald_muellerrobert_050118getty.jpg



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/16/mueller-told-trumps-legal-team-will-not-indict-president-giuliani-tells-fox-news.html

Of course not, long established interpretation of the Constitution says he must be impeached first.

Of course, Giuliani may not have his facts right once again
 
How many guilty pleas and resignations so far?
in terms of Russian collusion? zero
In terms of Russian trolls? 13
In terms of process crimes 7
++

so Mueller goes thru $5 million dollars, interrupts DC business ( OK maybe not) and hamstrings a POTUS-
for this?

Soon you're gonna see the entire FBI counterintelligence probe and Mueller were founded on nothing burgers as well
 
Giuliani: Mueller’s Team Acknowledges It Can’t Indict a Sitting President

Rudy Giuliani, a recently appointed member of President Trump’s legal team, claims Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigators have concluded they do not have the authority to indict a sitting president.

“All they get to do is write a report,” Giuliani told CNN. “They can’t indict. At least they acknowledged that to us after some battling, they acknowledged that to us.”

The alleged admission by Mueller’s team, which would likely be based on Department of Justice guidelines, does not preclude investigators from recommending that Trump be impeached in a report to House lawmakers.

The notion that a special counsel cannot indict a sitting president has been a settled position of the Department of Justice since the Nixon administration and was reaffirmed during the Clinton years, but has never had to withstand a legal challenge.

“The Justice Department memos going back to before Nixon say that you cannot indict a sitting president, you have to impeach him. Now there was a little time in which there was some dispute about that, but they acknowledged to us orally that they understand that they can’t violate the Justice Department rules,” Giuliani said.

“We think it’s bigger than that. We think it’s a constitutional rule, but I don’t think you’re ever going to confront that because nobody’s ever going to indict a sitting president. So, what does that leave them with? That leaves them with writing a report.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/rudy-giuliani-mueller-team-cannot-indict-sitting-president/
 
does not preclude investigators from recommending that Trump be impeached in a report to House lawmakers.
Muellers gonna throw up some shade, the Dems will froth, and depending on who controls the House
-more nothing burgers to come
 
Trump lied about the Stormy payment from the beginning to now. He did not disclose the payment . It was supposed to be on last years form and he did not do it. The ethics committee has a clear violation. The penalty is a 50 K fine and up to a year in jail.
 
Trump lied about the Stormy payment from the beginning to now. He did not disclose the payment . It was supposed to be on last years form and he did not do it. The ethics committee has a clear violation. The penalty is a 50 K fine and up to a year in jail.
THIS IS IT!
 
And not one tied into Russian collusion nor tied directly to Donald Trump. Why do most liberals keep avoiding that fact?

Because you are right and we, unlike you, aren't stupid. You don't know much about how cases are constructed, do you. You don't just throw the roof in the air.
If you don't sense what's coming you are as stupid as I know you are.
 
So if Mueller publishes a report with strong evidence that Rump has committed treasonous felonies, you don’t think Republicans would impeach?
 
Is the information that Mueller would not directly indict the President news to anyone?
 
So if Mueller publishes a report with strong evidence that Rump has committed treasonous felonies, you don’t think Republicans would impeach?

Did DEMOCRATS impeach when Clinton was tried in the Senate, Brad?
 
Because you are right and we, unlike you, aren't stupid. You don't know much about how cases are constructed, do you. You don't just throw the roof in the air.
If you don't sense what's coming you are as stupid as I know you are.

That is really as far as you needed to go. Of course I am right. And as far as "how cases are construed" you can pipe down fake lawyer. You sure as shit know nothing about it.
 
Back
Top