You can't prove that there's any relationship. OTOH. I've pointed to many examples where that's not true, which you ignore because they're "third world" countries. Doesn't matter. They still demonstrate that your premise is BS. None of your examples had any problems with guns before they had strict gun laws, so their current state has little or nothing to do with that. Something that you continue to ignore and divert from. Again, do you have any example where stricter gun laws have made things better?Gotta love it that the best you can do is keep referring to a third world country. That’s an obvious failure and concession on your part.
Again, you don’t know shit from “most, possibly all”. Just pure conjecture on your part. The bottom line is that where there are fewer guns and more difficult to obtain, the lower the gun death rate. You can’t dispute that, so you make up all kindsof diversionary shit to divert from the obvious truth.