What was bad about the Iran Deal?

IDF: Iranian forces fire 20 rockets at Israel; Iron Dome intercepts some
No Israeli injuries reported in attack; sirens blare in Golan Heights; Syrian army post comes under fire in Quneitra as tensions skyrocket on Israel-Syria border
By Judah Ari Gross Today, 12:26 am
Updated at 1:11 am

Some 20 rockets were fired at Israeli military bases by Iranian forces in southern Syria just after midnight on Thursday, with some of the incoming missiles being intercepted by the Iron Dome defense system, the army said, amid sky high tensions on the northern border.

There were no reports of Israeli casualties in the attack. An army spokesperson said damage was caused to Israeli military bases, but that it was “limited.”

The Israeli army said the missile barrage was carried out by members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Forces. This appeared to be the first time that Israel attributed an attack directly to Iran, which generally operates through proxies. The late night rocket barrage was also the largest attack, in terms of the number of rockets fired, in the seven years of the Syrian civil war.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/sirens-sound-in-golan-heights-residents-urged-to-enter-shelters/

Israel has been whining about Iran bombing them with nukes since the mid 1990s.
 
Will one of you Rumppers please tell me what good it does to pull out of the Iran deal?

It was because Obama's hand was in on it.
This is self-evident, and we all know this is exactly the reason Trump violated the agreement.

Anything else is mental gymnastics, and utter horseshit.
 
Easy

We should make NO DEALS with Terror Nations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why then should they make deals with you? Destroying the world for 'Israel' and the sick Saudi royal terrorists seems to most people a bad deal, kid.
 
Last edited:
Why then should they make deals with you? Destroying the world for 'Israel' and the sick Somali royal terrorists seems to most people a bad deal, kid.

:lolup: This is your brain on moron; don't be one. :rofl2:
giphy.gif
 
Iran is by no means backwards, but their leadership is bloody nuts. Iran has never helped impoverished Yemen and they have done very little for the Palestinians over the years. What they are doing now with Hezbollah, HAMAS and the al Houthis is disgraceful.

Wow; we have some common ground at long last. Good post for a change.
 
Fact is Iran is involved in their neighboring nations. they have a right to self protection and politics in the middle east. They have far more rights than the US because they are directly involved with the middle east. What would we do if someone attacked Mexico or Canada? That would be considered in our sphere of influence. We would have serious interests. But somehow we think Iran should not have rights to sway the countries around them for self preservation. repubs have double ,triple standards.
 
Easy

We should make NO DEALS with Terror Nations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On the side of that coin is that no nations should make deals with us because we are the Terror Nation according to a large percentage of the world.
 
I did answer your question. It is a bad deal because I don’t believe that we should be in the business to tell any other country what they can or cannot do.

You know we tried that with Iraq and it landed us in a war.

Now answer my question. Why do you think we should be able to dictate to Iran whether or not they have a nuclear program. Under what moral authority do you justify that?

Traditionally the US has always had this political belief that we can indeed dictate to other countries what they can and can't do or have and not have. This is why we lend a hand in installing or deposing duly elected (or not) leaders. No surprise there.
 
Fact is Iran is involved in their neighboring nations. they have a right to self protection and politics in the middle east.

Is anyone buying this idiots nonsense? Iran is fomenting terrorism throughout the region and this dunce thinks its about self protection.

The biggest threat to Iran had been eliminated when we invaded the nation and removed the tyrant Saddam Hussein from power. Apparently, that gave the peace loving Jihadist regime of Tehran the ability to spend their money fomenting jihad throughout the ME.

They have far more rights than the US because they are directly involved with the middle east.

Another moron eruption from the idiot; yeah dufus, that's why Saudi Arabia and Kuwait feel threatened by their terrorist peddling in the region.

What would we do if someone attacked Mexico or Canada?

Who is going to attack Mexico or Canada you moron?

But somehow we think Iran should not have rights to sway the countries around them for self preservation. repubs have double ,triple standards.

:lolup: Idiot thinks Iran's fomenting of terror is peaceful self preservation. This is why you cannot argue with morons people. They have ZERO grasp on reality.

Morons who make this kind of asinine claim also moronically believe that AmeriKa is the great Satan and threat to world peace.
 
It is a valid question. But when a troll starts the discussion with stupidity, its not likely to lead to anything more than what the thread has become. When you state that Trump thinks he knows more than others, I pointed out that you never would have stated the same about Obama. You would have bowed down and worshiped his infinite wisdom.

Like DACA, Obama circumvented Congress. That in an of itself was a bad idea.

Giving Iran the money was a bad idea.

As for pulling out, I am not a 'rumper' whatever that is and thus, the question was not for me.

Why was it our right to hold onto the money? Would we allow another country to do the same with our money?
 
On the side of that coin is that no nations should make deals with us because we are the Terror Nation according to a large percentage of the world.

Not only is this a false claim, it is borderline lunacy. WTF is wrong with you leftist retards anymore? It is an insult to morons to call you one.
 
Traditionally the US has always had this political belief that we can indeed dictate to other countries what they can and can't do or have and not have.

FALSE! This is just a pile of AmeriKa hating manure. Our nation has always attempted to stay out of other nations business which exacerbated the deaths and destruction in WWI and WWII. The lesson was, if we do not get involved, despots, tyrants and terrorists will cause far greater harm.

This is why we lend a hand in installing or deposing duly elected (or not) leaders. No surprise there.

Duly elected despots? :rofl2: So lets pretend you even have the slightest clue of what you are talking about with your death to America bullshit; examples please.
 
Why was it our right to hold onto the money?

Gee I don't know; perhaps because they are a rogue pariah nation trying to build a nuke in order to threaten their neighbors and global community?

How brain dead does one have to be to even have to ask such stupid questions?

Would we allow another country to do the same with our money?

We don't have to worry about that happening; we aren't a rogue lawless pariah nation threatening anyone. Dunce.
 
We had frozen it. Think of it like the way you left wing bleeding hearts think about taxes. Once it's taken, it's no longer theirs.

Why is it not longer theirs? What if countries started doing that to our assets...would we allow that to happen?
 
Not only is this a false claim, it is borderline lunacy. WTF is wrong with you leftist retards anymore? It is an insult to morons to call you one.

You truly don't hear what other nations think of the rough shod heavy handed approach America uses with the rest of the world, especially when they don't fall in line with our plans? You really don't know how we are viewed as the political bullies and we use our military or special forces or some damn thing to ensure might is right?
 
FALSE! This is just a pile of AmeriKa hating manure. Our nation has always attempted to stay out of other nations business which exacerbated the deaths and destruction in WWI and WWII. The lesson was, if we do not get involved, despots, tyrants and terrorists will cause far greater harm.



Duly elected despots? :rofl2: So lets pretend you even have the slightest clue of what you are talking about with your death to America bullshit; examples please.

So you can't think of a single country that America didn't help install or depose a leader? Not one?
 
Will one of you Rumppers please tell me what good it does to pull out of the Iran deal?

If you make a deal with a dog where the dog agrees to clean your house tomorrow in exchange for a steak right now, it is not really a deal. It may look like a deal, but it ain't.
 
If you make a deal with a dog where the dog agrees to clean your house tomorrow in exchange for a steak right now, it is not really a deal. It may look like a deal, but it ain't.

But you, and the conservatives above, still didn't answer the question, what was so bad about the Iran deal that made it advantageous to pull out of it?

You, and they above can't answer the question, neither can Trump, just like the Iraq War it was another classic blunder that will be exposed as such in the years to come
 
But you, and the conservatives above, still didn't answer the question, what was so bad about the Iran deal that made it advantageous to pull out of it?

You, and they above can't answer the question, neither can Trump, just like the Iraq War it was another classic blunder that will be exposed as such in the years to come

You misread my post, there never was a deal. Any airplanes full of cash or anything else that was given in effort to make the deal are what is wrong with the so called "deal'.
 
Back
Top