Pegging the bullshit meter on this one shit-for-brains.
lol with
Just got your ass handed to you with 5 citations. How many did you provide, zero? That’s right. ZERO
More Guns Means We Are Safer, Right?
- Thread starter zappasguitar
- Start date
lol with
Just got your ass handed to you with 5 citations. How many did you provide, zero? That’s right. ZERO
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
If we got rid of guns, people would find other ways to die.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
How many studies did it take to prove a causal link between smoking and lung cancer?
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Right now that is true, about guns anyway.
hvilleherb
Verified User
Like car accidents, yet libs never demand that cars be outlawed.
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Shooting first and asking questions later is a good way to get yourself brought up on manslaughter charges.
Montana homeowner who shot dead unarmed German exchange student trespassing in his garage gets 70 years
Markus Kaarma was sentenced Thursday to 70 years in prison, with no parole for at least 20 years, in the shotgun killing of Diren Dede
A Missoula jury convicted Kaarma of deliberate homicide in the case that caused an outcry in Germany
He shot Dede, who was unarmed, after being alerted by motion sensors in his garage
Witnesses said Kaarma fired at the teen four times, striking him twice
The case brought scrutiny to Montana's law allowing the use of deadly force in some situations to protect home and family
A Montana homeowner was sentenced Thursday to 70 years in prison, with no parole for at least 20 years, in the shotgun killing of a German exchange student who was trespassing in his garage.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...man-killed-German-student-set-sentencing.html
Less people own guns now then 30 years ago. Maybe more guns but less gun owners.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
hardly.......who's the idiot who didn't at least ring the doorbell......
Never fails. The ever-predictable, cretinous car/gun analogy. Also, very predictable that it is invoked by a clueless moron.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
???....she knew her target.......the guy standing in her house.......
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Self Defense? Washington Man Faces Possible Murder Charge for Shooting Showering Intruder
A Washington state man is facing a possible first-degree murder charge after shooting an intruder he found taking a shower in a property he owned — in a case authorities and legal experts said appeared to go beyond self-defense laws.
Bruce Fanning, 59, is accused of fatally shooting Nathaniel Rosa, 31, after he discovered Rosa bathing early Saturday morning in Belfair, Washington, according to the Mason County Sheriff's Office.
Authorities say Fanning discovered his place of business, which is near his home, had been broken into and found Rosa in the shower.
Fanning told investigators he confronted Rosa, who responded with “some unintelligible words that seemed threatening to him and that he appeared drunk,” Mason County Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy Ryan Spurling told NBC News.
Fanning then left the building, went next door to his home and got a hand gun, returned and shot Rosa, Spurling said.
Both Spurling and a press release from the sheriff’s office said Fanning did not try interact with Rosa again before shooting him.
"He wasn’t in any danger when he left the residence," Spurling said, later adding, "He reinserted himself, saw the individual was still showering and shot him — that’s not self-defense."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/self-defense-washington-man-faces-possible-murder-charge-shooting-showering-n742646
A Washington state man is facing a possible first-degree murder charge after shooting an intruder he found taking a shower in a property he owned — in a case authorities and legal experts said appeared to go beyond self-defense laws.
Bruce Fanning, 59, is accused of fatally shooting Nathaniel Rosa, 31, after he discovered Rosa bathing early Saturday morning in Belfair, Washington, according to the Mason County Sheriff's Office.
Authorities say Fanning discovered his place of business, which is near his home, had been broken into and found Rosa in the shower.
Fanning told investigators he confronted Rosa, who responded with “some unintelligible words that seemed threatening to him and that he appeared drunk,” Mason County Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy Ryan Spurling told NBC News.
Fanning then left the building, went next door to his home and got a hand gun, returned and shot Rosa, Spurling said.
Both Spurling and a press release from the sheriff’s office said Fanning did not try interact with Rosa again before shooting him.
"He wasn’t in any danger when he left the residence," Spurling said, later adding, "He reinserted himself, saw the individual was still showering and shot him — that’s not self-defense."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/self-defense-washington-man-faces-possible-murder-charge-shooting-showering-n742646
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
in BucKKKle's case anyone near him owning a gun increases his risk of being shot......
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
TEXAS!
Why if You Shoot Trespassers, You'll Probably go to Jail
Home News Crime Why if You Shoot Trespassers, You'll Probably go to Jail
Why if You Shoot Trespassers, You'll Probably go to Jail
By Chelsea Reinhard | Sep. 15, 2014 8:00 am
Killing isn’t always illegal in Texas, however when one can justifiably use deadly force to protect their property is not only complicated, but often misunderstood.
Signs on property edges threatening to shoot trespassers and the faulty notion of the right to kill a cheating spouse under a “temporary insanity” defense are old adages most have seen or heard in west Texas, however tongues quick to draw often miss the mark when it comes to proper application of the law.
“Trespassing can be met with force, but not deadly force,” Tom Green County Sheriff David Jones explains. “There’s certain things that you can and can’t do. It’s just not, ‘if you get on my property, I can shoot you’.”
Paramount to using deadly force to protect property is the time of day. Texas law affords owners of land or tangible, moveable property the right to use deadly force only at nighttime, and again only in two distinct situations.
In order to use force to protect property, the penal code states that a person reasonably believes force is necessary to prevent or terminate trespass or interference with property or that the force is immediately necessary to recover the property.
The law places further stipulations on the use of deadly force, which requires that one reasonably believe the deadly force is immediately necessary in order to: (1) prevent the imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night, or; (2) to prevent someone
http://sanangelolive.com/news/crime/2014-09-15/why-if-you-shoot-trespassers-youll-probably-go-jail
Why if You Shoot Trespassers, You'll Probably go to Jail
Home News Crime Why if You Shoot Trespassers, You'll Probably go to Jail
Why if You Shoot Trespassers, You'll Probably go to Jail
By Chelsea Reinhard | Sep. 15, 2014 8:00 am
Killing isn’t always illegal in Texas, however when one can justifiably use deadly force to protect their property is not only complicated, but often misunderstood.
Signs on property edges threatening to shoot trespassers and the faulty notion of the right to kill a cheating spouse under a “temporary insanity” defense are old adages most have seen or heard in west Texas, however tongues quick to draw often miss the mark when it comes to proper application of the law.
“Trespassing can be met with force, but not deadly force,” Tom Green County Sheriff David Jones explains. “There’s certain things that you can and can’t do. It’s just not, ‘if you get on my property, I can shoot you’.”
Paramount to using deadly force to protect property is the time of day. Texas law affords owners of land or tangible, moveable property the right to use deadly force only at nighttime, and again only in two distinct situations.
In order to use force to protect property, the penal code states that a person reasonably believes force is necessary to prevent or terminate trespass or interference with property or that the force is immediately necessary to recover the property.
The law places further stipulations on the use of deadly force, which requires that one reasonably believe the deadly force is immediately necessary in order to: (1) prevent the imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night, or; (2) to prevent someone
http://sanangelolive.com/news/crime/2014-09-15/why-if-you-shoot-trespassers-youll-probably-go-jail
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
You think this guy likes the idea of shooting first and asking question later, NOW?
Ohio Father Shoots and Kills Teen Son, Thinking He's an Intruder
During a press briefing, Cincinnati Police Capt. Terry Theetge confirms that the boy had been dropped off at the school bus stop earlier that morning.
Moments later, Georta Mack’s father returned to the family’s residence, retiring to bed, according to Theetge.
Georta decided to skip school, the captain explains, and walked home, entering the residence through a back door.
• Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Click here to get breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases in the True Crime Newsletter.
Theetge says that Georta retreated to the home’s basement. There, the teen made a noise, waking his father. The police captain says Georta’s dad grabbed a handgun and entered the basement.
Believing the child “was an intruder, he fired one shot,” Theetge explains, noting Georta was struck in the neck and died soon after arriving at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
http://people.com/crime/ohio-dad-shoots-son-thinking-hes-an-intruder/
This was not an isolated incident.
Ohio Father Shoots and Kills Teen Son, Thinking He's an Intruder
During a press briefing, Cincinnati Police Capt. Terry Theetge confirms that the boy had been dropped off at the school bus stop earlier that morning.
Moments later, Georta Mack’s father returned to the family’s residence, retiring to bed, according to Theetge.
Georta decided to skip school, the captain explains, and walked home, entering the residence through a back door.
• Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Click here to get breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases in the True Crime Newsletter.
Theetge says that Georta retreated to the home’s basement. There, the teen made a noise, waking his father. The police captain says Georta’s dad grabbed a handgun and entered the basement.
Believing the child “was an intruder, he fired one shot,” Theetge explains, noting Georta was struck in the neck and died soon after arriving at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
http://people.com/crime/ohio-dad-shoots-son-thinking-hes-an-intruder/
This was not an isolated incident.
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Oh brother, SC homeowner’s reaction to mistaken burglary results in trip to hospital
According to the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office, a homeowner on Dickson Road in Blacksburg mistook his brother for a burglar and shot through his front door, hitting his brother, wspa.com reported.
Sheriff Steven Mueller said it was “just a case of mistaken identity,” according to foxcarolina.com, which reported the homeowner fired at least one shot through the door.
http://www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article185568438.html
According to the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office, a homeowner on Dickson Road in Blacksburg mistook his brother for a burglar and shot through his front door, hitting his brother, wspa.com reported.
Sheriff Steven Mueller said it was “just a case of mistaken identity,” according to foxcarolina.com, which reported the homeowner fired at least one shot through the door.
http://www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article185568438.html
BodyDouble
New member
Neither is good guys with a gun saving lives or stopping a shooter. It happens quite frequently. Yet, you leftist morons deny that. You ignorantly say it's a rare occurrence. You're wrong.
My State's laws say it is proper for me to protect myself, my family, and those visiting me from intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil suits. In fact, it extends that proper action to my vehicle and place of business along with those in my vehicle and place of business. In goes on to say that I need not retreat in from and intrusion/attack nor surround my personal safety to a criminal.