Myth Number 1, A warrant was attained based on false information.

How is that scenario similar to what is going on her? Where is there any evidence that the portions of the dossier used to get the warrant were unverified?

Comey swore under oath after the application to the FISC that the dossier was "salacious and unverified," not that "portions were salacious and unverified," you laughably stupid fuck.
 
We're so lucky to have someone that is a lawyer....a master at the law.....

So it ain't true and it ain't false....what is it.....an allegation that someone committed a crime ?
So riddle me this,
If so, what is the allegation or crime, etc...what law has been broken ? what is the accused being accused of ?
Do the FISA courts give out warrants on allegations now ? Or have they ever ? or do they all the time ?

We don’t know yet.

Under W they made it legal to keep this stuff secret.
 
"Salacious and unverified," you ignorant fucking moron. You're too stupid to have a rational discussion with, you fake lawyer dipshit. You're done.

Part was salacious and unverified, not ALL, you dimwit!

And unverified does not mean false!
 
Maybe you should re-read TD's post....Comey under oath testimony.....

Is Comey lying?

BURR: Are you confident that no votes cast in the 2016 presidential election were altered?

COMEY: I'm confident. When I left as director I had seen no indication of that whatsoever.

BURR: Director Comey, did the president at any time ask you to stop the FBI investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 U.S. Elections?

COMEY: Not to my understanding, no.

BURR: Did any individual working for this administration, including the justice department, ask you to stop the Russian investigation?

COMEY: No.

lol

Perhaps you should look up the word "alter".

Are you able to read and comprehend Comey's other quotes Nope, he doesn't use the word "stop", does he? But the intent of the language is clear.

Sad fucking Trumpsucker.
 
Part was salacious and unverified, not ALL, you dimwit!

And unverified does not mean false!


Comey swore under oath after the application to the FISC that the dossier was "salacious and unverified," not that "portions were salacious and unverified," you laughably stupid fuck
 
You girls are so desperate you have resorted to lies, pittaful! Desperation looks bad on you!
 
Comey swore under oath after the application to the FISC that the dossier was "salacious and unverified," not that "portions were salacious and unverified," you laughably stupid fuck.

lol

I know you won't because you're a willfully ignorant cretin, but you should really look up the word "salacious".

Jesus, how do you illiterate fucks make it through the day? Who reads the highways signs for you?
 
Absolutely untrue.

He didn't say "part or portions," of the pissgate dossier were "Salacious and unverified," you laughably stupid fuck:


COLLINS: Did you limit that statement to counterintelligence invest — investigations, or were you talking about any FBI investigation?

COMEY: I didn't use the term counterintelligence. I was briefing him about salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true. My reading of it was it was important for me to assure him we were not person investigating him. So the context then was actually narrower, focused on what I just talked to him about. It was very important because it was, first, true, and second, I was worried very much about being in kind of a J. Edgar Hoover-type situation. I didn't want him thinking I was briefing him on this to sort of hang it over him in some way. I was briefing him on it because, because we had been told by the media it was about to launch. We didn't want to be keeping that from him. He needed to know this was being said. I was very keen not to leave him with an impression that the bureau was trying to do something to him. So that's the context in which I said, sir, we're not personally investigating you.


Notice that the word "portions" is not in his testimony?

Annnnnd you're done dipshit.
 
lol

I know you won't because you're a willfully ignorant cretin, but you should really look up the word "salacious".

Jesus, how do you illiterate fucks make it through the day? Who reads the highways signs for you?

They used the "salacious and unverified," DNC funded and FSB provided pissgate dossier to obtain a FISA warrant against the opposition campaign. You're done.
 
You girls are so desperate you have resorted to lies, pittaful! Desperation looks bad on you!

Kill yourself you lying faggot:

COLLINS: Did you limit that statement to counterintelligence invest — investigations, or were you talking about any FBI investigation?

COMEY: I didn't use the term counterintelligence. I was briefing him about salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true. My reading of it was it was important for me to assure him we were not person investigating him. So the context then was actually narrower, focused on what I just talked to him about. It was very important because it was, first, true, and second, I was worried very much about being in kind of a J. Edgar Hoover-type situation. I didn't want him thinking I was briefing him on this to sort of hang it over him in some way. I was briefing him on it because, because we had been told by the media it was about to launch. We didn't want to be keeping that from him. He needed to know this was being said. I was very keen not to leave him with an impression that the bureau was trying to do something to him. So that's the context in which I said, sir, we're not personally investigating you.


You're done.
 
Part was salacious and unverified, not ALL, you dimwit!

Please show me the words "part, parts, partial, portion, or some in the following you lying faggot:

C/P where he said the words "part, parts, partial, portions, or some," of the material (the pissgate dossier) in his testimony, or this will be the only response from me you will get from me on the subject from here on out:

COLLINS: Did you limit that statement to counterintelligence invest — investigations, or were you talking about any FBI investigation?

COMEY: I didn't use the term counterintelligence. I was briefing him about salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true. My reading of it was it was important for me to assure him we were not person investigating him. So the context then was actually narrower, focused on what I just talked to him about. It was very important because it was, first, true, and second, I was worried very much about being in kind of a J. Edgar Hoover-type situation. I didn't want him thinking I was briefing him on this to sort of hang it over him in some way. I was briefing him on it because, because we had been told by the media it was about to launch. We didn't want to be keeping that from him. He needed to know this was being said. I was very keen not to leave him with an impression that the bureau was trying to do something to him. So that's the context in which I said, sir, we're not personally investigating you.


And unverified does not mean false!

So you think unverified oppo research provided by Russian intelligence meets the burden of probable cause to obtain the warrant? Still claiming to be a lawyer you laughably stupid lying POS?
 
Last edited:
Please show me the words "part, parts, partial, portion, or some in the following you lying faggot:

COLLINS: Did you limit that statement to counterintelligence invest — investigations, or were you talking about any FBI investigation?

COMEY: I didn't use the term counterintelligence. I was briefing him about salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true. My reading of it was it was important for me to assure him we were not person investigating him. So the context then was actually narrower, focused on what I just talked to him about. It was very important because it was, first, true, and second, I was worried very much about being in kind of a J. Edgar Hoover-type situation. I didn't want him thinking I was briefing him on this to sort of hang it over him in some way. I was briefing him on it because, because we had been told by the media it was about to launch. We didn't want to be keeping that from him. He needed to know this was being said. I was very keen not to leave him with an impression that the bureau was trying to do something to him. So that's the context in which I said, sir, we're not personally investigating you.




So you think unverified oppo research provided by Russian intelligence meets the burden of probable cause to obtain the warrant? Still claiming to be a lawyer you laughably stupid lying POS?


You are the one assuming he was talking about ALL... clearly he is only talking about the portion he stayed behind to talk to Rump about!

I think opposite research could be verified and ultimately meet the standard for a warrant.
 
Back
Top