Mueller's Investigation is Larger and Further Along than You Think

[ThatOwlWoman]

You should've actually read the article, numb nuts.

I liked this part:

"5. Obstruction of Justice. This is the big kahuna—the question of whether President Trump obstructed justice by pressuring FBI director James Comey to “look past” the FBI’s investigation of Michael Flynn and whether his firing in May was in any way tied to Comey’s refusal to stop the investigation. This thread, as far as we know from public reporting, remains the only part of the investigation that stretches directly into the Oval Office. It likely focuses not only on the President and the FBI director but also on a handful of related questions about the FBI investigation of Flynn and the White House’s statements about the Trump Tower meeting. The president himself has said publicly that he fired Comey over “this Russia thing.”

"There’s fresh reason to believe that this is an active criminal investigation; lost amid the news of the Nunes memo on Friday was a court ruling in a lawsuit where I and a handful of other reporters from outlets like CNN and Daily Caller are suing the Justice Department to release the “Comey memos”: The ruling held that, based on the FBI’s private testimony to the court—including evidence from Michael Dreeben, one of the leaders of the special counsel’s office—releasing the memos would compromise the investigation."

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Jeebus. Did you read #5?

Jinx. I just posted an excerpt about that one.

 

[countryboy]

Seems legit, still reading. Silently lecturing self about confirmation bias. ;~)

Of course it's legit for corn sake! It's wired dot calm fer cryin' out loud! Everyone knows they are an unimpeachable source for leftist loonery.

 

[christiefan915]

Jinx. I just posted an excerpt about that one.

Lol. Let's watch Yayurt spin his way out of this.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Of course it's legit for corn sake! It's wired dot calm fer cryin' out loud! Everyone knows they are an unimpeachable source for leftist loonery.

It's sourced and I've read confirming articles elsewhere. It also has some hyperbole, but not over the top.

You go ahead and munch your NothingBurger. We'll be over here mixing up a special batch of Schadenfreude Sauce for you when Mueller is done. Would you like handcuffs with that order, sir? lol

 

[countryboy]

I liked this part:

"5. Obstruction of Justice. This is the big kahuna—the question of whether President Trump obstructed justice by pressuring FBI director James Comey to “look past” the FBI’s investigation of Michael Flynn and whether his firing in May was in any way tied to Comey’s refusal to stop the investigation. This thread, as far as we know from public reporting, remains the only part of the investigation that stretches directly into the Oval Office. It likely focuses not only on the President and the FBI director but also on a handful of related questions about the FBI investigation of Flynn and the White House’s statements about the Trump Tower meeting. The president himself has said publicly that he fired Comey over “this Russia thing.”

"There’s fresh reason to believe that this is an active criminal investigation; lost amid the news of the Nunes memo on Friday was a court ruling in a lawsuit where I and a handful of other reporters from outlets like CNN and Daily Caller are suing the Justice Department to release the “Comey memos”: The ruling held that, based on the FBI’s private testimony to the court—including evidence from Michael Dreeben, one of the leaders of the special counsel’s office—releasing the memos would compromise the investigation."

Can you explain to us what exactly was obstructed by the firing of Comey? Isn't the investigation still ongoing? Are you seriously telling me the president of the United States doesn't have a constitutional right to fire the FBI director? Is the FBI not a part of the executive branch? Lol, you people are scared to death, as well you should be.

 

[countryboy]

It's sourced and I've read confirming articles elsewhere. It also has some hyperbole, but not over the top.

You go ahead and munch your NothingBurger. We'll be over here mixing up a special batch of Schadenfreude Sauce for you when Mueller is done. Would you like handcuffs with that order, sir? lol

Holy hyperbolic horseshit Batman! Er.... I mean equine excrement.

 

[domer76]

Of course it's legit for corn sake! It's wired dot calm fer cryin' out loud! Everyone knows they are an unimpeachable source for leftist loonery.

“These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: Wired Magazine is primarily a tech magazine. However, they do report news and politics on an occasional basis. When they do they have a left-center bias in reporting and wording.”

Compare to this ^ idiot’sBreitbart, WND, FOX.

Got your ass kicked again, moron.

Such low hanging fruit.

 

[domer76]

Can you explain to us what exactly was obstructed by the firing of Comey? Isn't the investigation still ongoing? Are you seriously telling me the president of the United States doesn't have a constitutional right to fire the FBI director? Is the FBI not a part of the executive branch? Lol, you people are scared to death, as well you should be.

lol

And they say that there’s no such thing as a stupid question. Folks, here’s a classic one!

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Can you explain to us what exactly was obstructed by the firing of Comey? Isn't the investigation still ongoing? Are you seriously telling me the president of the United States doesn't have a constitutional right to fire the FBI director? Is the FBI not a part of the executive branch? Lol, you people are scared to death, as well you should be.

He clearly states that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation. I'm sure you're aware that the investigation began because of information showing that not only did the Russians interfere with U.S. electoral processes, they contacted members of Trump's campaign team before and after. Don't you want to know why? Or is that okay with you, since you got the desired result -- no President Clinton? If the shoe was on the other foot and there was evidence that President Clinton had been elected in part due to Russian shenanigans, involving her and/or her team, I *KNOW* you all would be screaming more than just "Lock her up" about now.

Trump stating on camera why he fired Comey:

https://www.msnbc.com/brian-william...ussia-questions-in-nbc-interview-942122051703

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

“These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: Wired Magazine is primarily a tech magazine. However, they do report news and politics on an occasional basis. When they do they have a left-center bias in reporting and wording.”

Compare to this ^ idiot’sBreitbart, WND, FOX.

Got your ass kicked again, moron.

Such low hanging fruit.

Awesome, thanks. My husband subscribes to that magazine, for the tech stuff (he's a systems architect/software engineer). He's pretty much apolitical as well.

 

[Pot]

Trumps going down.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Jeebus. Did you read #5?

What evidence is there? I read no evidence, just wild ass speculation.

There is more evidence the FBI relied on a document (proven mostly false or not credible) created and paid for by the Democrat party. The fact that doesn't bother you I'd appalling.

 

[Nomad]

I liked this part:

"5. Obstruction of Justice. This is the big kahuna—the question of whether President Trump obstructed justice by pressuring FBI director James Comey to “look past” the FBI’s investigation of Michael Flynn and whether his firing in May was in any way tied to Comey’s refusal to stop the investigation. This thread, as far as we know from public reporting, remains the only part of the investigation that stretches directly into the Oval Office. It likely focuses not only on the President and the FBI director but also on a handful of related questions about the FBI investigation of Flynn and the White House’s statements about the Trump Tower meeting. The president himself has said publicly that he fired Comey over “this Russia thing.”

"There’s fresh reason to believe that this is an active criminal investigation; lost amid the news of the Nunes memo on Friday was a court ruling in a lawsuit where I and a handful of other reporters from outlets like CNN and Daily Caller are suing the Justice Department to release the “Comey memos”: The ruling held that, based on the FBI’s private testimony to the court—including evidence from Michael Dreeben, one of the leaders of the special counsel’s office—releasing the memos would compromise the investigation."

I liked that part, too.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

You'll never get obstruction. Explained before, poor liberals, must continue to discredit the office of the Presidency.

 

[crowonapost]

You'll never get obstruction. Explained before, poor liberals, must continue to discredit the office of the Presidency.

Nahh the current POTUS does that all by himself. No need for parties. It's the swamp draining you wanted, no respect, regardless of party. It's by your wish.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Nahh the current POTUS does that all by himself. No need for parties. It's the swamp draining you wanted, no respect, regardless of party. It's by your wish.

Trump has made a wee embarrassment of the office, however, that is a far cry from delegitimizing an entire Constitutional office and the Presidency thereof.

It was disgusting when the birthed did and disgusting when the Russia fear mongers do it.

 

[Nomad]

You'll never get obstruction. Explained before, poor liberals, must continue to discredit the office of the Presidency.

Dumpster Donnie discredits the office of the Presidency just by occupying it.

Repugnant voters discredited the office of the Presidency by electing the low rent turd.

 

[J Craft]

Hahaha! "Further along" "closer than ever" lol!

It's the same BS as has been reported ad-nauseum!
What's closer than ever is the crumbling of the Russia collusion house-of-cards and corruption.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Dumpster Donnie discredits the office of the Presidency just by occupying it.

Repugnant voters discredited the office of the Presidency by electing the low rent turd.

Do you even know what the word discredit means?

Use it in a sentence.