Memo and national security

what collections systems and processes? The FISA court? Its existence is known theres kind of a law for it.. It was known that Page was originally surveilled in 2013 htough it was not renewed due to lack of evidence.

Lack of trust in FBI? Should all their wrongdoings be kept secret then?

I find that feigned concern for the credibility of the FBI hilarious given the oft-expressed views of BAC and TTQ64 on the subject. Just the other day they claimed all DoJ data was a fabrication of racists, didn't they?
 
what collections systems and processes? The FISA court? Its existence is known theres kind of a law for it.. It was known that Page was originally surveilled in 2013 htough it was not renewed due to lack of evidence.

Lack of trust in FBI? Should all their wrongdoings be kept secret then?

Page’s civil rights were abused by a government agency, comrade.

And democrats don’t care. What libertarian would dare call themselves a democrat these days?
 
I'm sorry, but that ONLY works in TrumpyWorld.

FISA used FAR more than the dossier to make judgement about monitoring an individual they had been monitoring since 2013.

Your argument is ridiculous and purely partisan .. and if more than Nunes footnotes had been revealed, you would already know that.

Didn’t Comey testify under oath that the Dossier was ‘salacious and unverified’. Was he lying?
 
what collections systems and processes? The FISA court? Its existence is known theres kind of a law for it.. It was known that Page was originally surveilled in 2013 htough it was not renewed due to lack of evidence.

Lack of trust in FBI? Should all their wrongdoings be kept secret then?

If you aren't in intelligence gathering, you wouldn't have a clue about what is being compromised. Those in intelligence gathering know full well.

There is a plethora of information available to educate you on this very subject .. if you are really interested in truth beyond your politics.

I've read some of it, you should as well .. unless Fox News is all you require.
 
So the memo is at the same time a “nothing burger” AND A “threat to national security”?

Only a liberal could claim that


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Didn’t Comey testify under oath that the Dossier was ‘salacious and unverified’. Was he lying?

I do recognize your need to focus solely on the dossier, but that focus is intentional.

FISA only needs to hear credible evidence of foreign interference, and FAR more than the dossier was presented.

Page has been under surveillance since 2013 .. how are you skipping right past that truth?
 
If you aren't in intelligence gathering, you wouldn't have a clue about what is being compromised.

But you would? :rofl2:

Those in intelligence gathering know full well.

You mean "those suspected of abusing their positions and intelligence gathering capabilities", don't you?

There is a plethora of information available to educate you on this very subject .. if you are really interested in truth beyond your politics.

One wonders why you can't seem to cite it.

I've read some of it, you should as well.

So you say.

BTW, I know this ignoramus claims to be ignoring me. I enjoy beating the shit out of him (figuratively) while he cowers in his self-inflicted fetal position.
 
I do recognize your need to focus solely on the dossier, but that focus is intentional.

FISA only needs to hear credible evidence of foreign interference, and FAR more than the dossier was presented.

Page has been under surveillance since 2013 .. how are you skipping right past that truth?

because he wasnt? They stopped the investigation due to lack of evidence and reopened when he joined the Trump campaign.
 
because he wasnt? They stopped the investigation due to lack of evidence and reopened when he joined the Trump campaign.

What do you think is missing from your earth shattering memo that has proven to be one of the biggest duds in American political history?

The truth of why Page was targeted is not only in what republicans don't want you to know, it's also available to you if you actually wanted to know. I could easily post it .. but to people who don't want to know, it would be a waste of my time.

Would you be honest enough to acknowledge that this dud is related to Trump's obsession with ending the Mueller investigation?

Before you answer that, Trump has already said that it is.

Question: what does that say about you?

I ask that respectfully. I'm not picking I fight, I'd like an honest conversation.
 
Back
Top