Evidence suggests a massive scandal is brewing at the FBI

Rune said:
Alleged, if true, suggesting, point to the existence of, if true, I believe, it would mean, it is almost certain, believes, he claimed, I want to believe, might be, suspicions, estimated, purportedly,

Long on innuendo, short on facts.

Get a life
Click to expand...
I don't hear you saying that about Mueller, hypocrite!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Michael Goodwin
Opinion

Evidence suggests a massive scandal is brewing at the FBI
By Michael Goodwin



from your link
 
Frank Apisa said:
Yeah, this is gonna be even bigger than Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!

View attachment 5719
Click to expand...

Wasnt Benghazi a serious scandal, where arms were provide to anti Assad rebels. A scandal that cost men their lives?Wasnt the investigation under the purview of the same Justice department as the Hillary email scandal? Are not some of these same people connected via Comey to the Trump/Russia collusion?

Entrenched corruption, isn’t something that should be so glibly dismissed, especially, in light of the bandwagoneering by Democrats over the Russia Collusion farce.
 
dear fucking idiot,

Benghazi was investigated how many fucking times by you right wing evil fucks?


you threw away TAX PAYER MONEY on that fake scandal for how many years ?


fuck you very much
 
noise said:
During the financial crisis, the federal government bailed out banks it declared “too big to fail.” Fearing their bankruptcy might trigger economic Armageddon, the feds propped them up with taxpayer cash.

Something similar is happening now at the FBI, with the Washington wagons circling the agency to protect it from charges of corruption. This time, the appropriate tag line is “too big to believe.”

Yet each day brings credible reports suggesting there is a massive scandal involving the top ranks of America’s premier law enforcement agency. The reports, which feature talk among agents of a “secret society” and suddenly missing text messages, point to the existence both of a cabal dedicated to defeating Donald Trump in 2016 and of a plan to let Hillary Clinton skate free in the classified email probe.

If either one is true — and I believe both probably are — it would mean FBI leaders betrayed the nation by abusing their powers in a bid to pick the president.

More support for this view involves the FBI’s use of the Russian dossier on Trump that was paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. It is almost certain that the FBI used the dossier to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump associates, meaning it used the opposition research of the party in power to convince a court to let it spy on the candidate of the other party — likely without telling the court of the dossier’s political link.

Even worse, there is growing reason to believe someone in President Barack Obama’s administration turned over classified information about Trump to the Clinton campaign.

As one former federal prosecutor put it, “It doesn’t get worse than that.” That prosecutor, Joseph *diGenova, believes Trump was correct when he claimed Obama aides wiretapped his phones at Trump Tower.

These and other elements combine to make a toxic brew that smells to high heaven, but most Americans don’t know much about it. Mainstream media coverage has been sparse and dismissive and there’s a blackout from the same Democrats obsessed with Russia, Russia, Russia.

Partisan motives aside, it’s as if a scandal of this magnitude is more than America can bear — so let’s pretend there’s nothing to see and move along.

But, thankfully the disgraceful episode won’t be washed away, thanks to a handful of congressional Republicans, led by California Rep. Devin Nunes, chairman of the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. After he accused the FBI of stonewalling in turning over records, the bureau relented, at least partially.

The result was clear evidence of bias against Trump by officials charged with investigating him and Clinton. Those same agents appear to have acted on that bias to tilt the election to Clinton.


In one text message, an agent suggests that Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew while the investigation was still going on that the FBI would not recommend charges against Clinton.

How could she know unless the fix was in?

All roads in the explosive developments lead to James Comey, whose Boy Scout image belied a sinister belief that he, like his infamous predecessor J. Edgar Hoover, was above the law.

It is why I named him J. Edgar Comey last year and wrote that he was “adept at using innuendo and leaks” to let everybody in Washington know they could be the next to be investigated.

It was in the office of Comey’s top deputy, Andrew McCabe, where agents discussed an “insurance policy” in the event that Trump won. Reports indicated that the Russia-collusion probe was that insurance policy.

The text was from Peter Strzok, the top investigator on the Trump case, and was sent to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and also his mistress.



It is frightening that Strzok, who called Trump “an idiot,” was the lead investigator on both the Clinton and Trump cases.

After these messages surfaced, special counsel Robert Mueller removed Strzok and Page from his probe, though both still work at the FBI.

Strzok, despite his talk of an “insurance policy” in 2016, wrote in May of 2017 that he was skeptical Mueller’s probe would find anything on Trump because “there’s no big there there.”

Talk about irony. While Dems and the left-wing media already found Trump guilty of collusion before Mueller was appointed, the real scandal might be the conduct of the probers themselves.

Suspicions are hardly allayed by the fact that the FBI says it can’t find five months of messages between Strzok and Page, who exchanged an estimated 50,000 messages overall. The missing period — Dec. 14, 2016 through May 17, 2017 — was a crucial time in Washington.

There were numerous leaks of classified material just before and after Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

And the president fired Comey last May 9, provoking an intense lobbying effort for a special counsel, which led to Mueller’s appointment on May 19.

Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, has emerged from his hidey hole to notice that the FBI has run amok, and said Monday he would “leave no stone unturned” to find the five months of missing texts.

Fine, but the House is racing ahead of him. Nunes has prepared a four-page memo, based on classified material that purportedly lays out what the FBI and others did to corrupt the election.

A movement to release the memo is gaining steam, but Congress says it might take weeks. Why wait? Americans can handle the truth, no matter how big it is.
https://nypost.com/2018/01/23/evidence-suggests-a-massive-scandal-is-brewing-at-the-fbi/
Click to expand...

Yawn
 
Rune said:
Alleged, if true, suggesting, point to the existence of, if true, I believe, it would mean, it is almost certain, believes, he claimed, I want to believe, might be, suspicions, estimated, purportedly,

Long on innuendo, short on facts.

Get a life
Click to expand...
yet you are so sure of Russian collusion based on what? Democratic hyperbole?

There are more and more dots..connect the data points is what is being done here.
 
noise said:
During the financial crisis, the federal government bailed out banks it declared “too big to fail.” Fearing their bankruptcy might trigger economic Armageddon, the feds propped them up with taxpayer cash.

Something similar is happening now at the FBI, with the Washington wagons circling the agency to protect it from charges of corruption. This time, the appropriate tag line is “too big to believe.”

Yet each day brings credible reports suggesting there is a massive scandal involving the top ranks of America’s premier law enforcement agency. The reports, which feature talk among agents of a “secret society” and suddenly missing text messages, point to the existence both of a cabal dedicated to defeating Donald Trump in 2016 and of a plan to let Hillary Clinton skate free in the classified email probe.

If either one is true — and I believe both probably are — it would mean FBI leaders betrayed the nation by abusing their powers in a bid to pick the president.

More support for this view involves the FBI’s use of the Russian dossier on Trump that was paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. It is almost certain that the FBI used the dossier to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump associates, meaning it used the opposition research of the party in power to convince a court to let it spy on the candidate of the other party — likely without telling the court of the dossier’s political link.

Even worse, there is growing reason to believe someone in President Barack Obama’s administration turned over classified information about Trump to the Clinton campaign.

As one former federal prosecutor put it, “It doesn’t get worse than that.” That prosecutor, Joseph *diGenova, believes Trump was correct when he claimed Obama aides wiretapped his phones at Trump Tower.

These and other elements combine to make a toxic brew that smells to high heaven, but most Americans don’t know much about it. Mainstream media coverage has been sparse and dismissive and there’s a blackout from the same Democrats obsessed with Russia, Russia, Russia.

Partisan motives aside, it’s as if a scandal of this magnitude is more than America can bear — so let’s pretend there’s nothing to see and move along.

But, thankfully the disgraceful episode won’t be washed away, thanks to a handful of congressional Republicans, led by California Rep. Devin Nunes, chairman of the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. After he accused the FBI of stonewalling in turning over records, the bureau relented, at least partially.

The result was clear evidence of bias against Trump by officials charged with investigating him and Clinton. Those same agents appear to have acted on that bias to tilt the election to Clinton.


In one text message, an agent suggests that Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew while the investigation was still going on that the FBI would not recommend charges against Clinton.

How could she know unless the fix was in?

All roads in the explosive developments lead to James Comey, whose Boy Scout image belied a sinister belief that he, like his infamous predecessor J. Edgar Hoover, was above the law.

It is why I named him J. Edgar Comey last year and wrote that he was “adept at using innuendo and leaks” to let everybody in Washington know they could be the next to be investigated.

It was in the office of Comey’s top deputy, Andrew McCabe, where agents discussed an “insurance policy” in the event that Trump won. Reports indicated that the Russia-collusion probe was that insurance policy.

The text was from Peter Strzok, the top investigator on the Trump case, and was sent to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and also his mistress.



It is frightening that Strzok, who called Trump “an idiot,” was the lead investigator on both the Clinton and Trump cases.

After these messages surfaced, special counsel Robert Mueller removed Strzok and Page from his probe, though both still work at the FBI.

Strzok, despite his talk of an “insurance policy” in 2016, wrote in May of 2017 that he was skeptical Mueller’s probe would find anything on Trump because “there’s no big there there.”

Talk about irony. While Dems and the left-wing media already found Trump guilty of collusion before Mueller was appointed, the real scandal might be the conduct of the probers themselves.

Suspicions are hardly allayed by the fact that the FBI says it can’t find five months of messages between Strzok and Page, who exchanged an estimated 50,000 messages overall. The missing period — Dec. 14, 2016 through May 17, 2017 — was a crucial time in Washington.

There were numerous leaks of classified material just before and after Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

And the president fired Comey last May 9, provoking an intense lobbying effort for a special counsel, which led to Mueller’s appointment on May 19.

Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, has emerged from his hidey hole to notice that the FBI has run amok, and said Monday he would “leave no stone unturned” to find the five months of missing texts.

Fine, but the House is racing ahead of him. Nunes has prepared a four-page memo, based on classified material that purportedly lays out what the FBI and others did to corrupt the election.

A movement to release the memo is gaining steam, but Congress says it might take weeks. Why wait? Americans can handle the truth, no matter how big it is.
https://nypost.com/2018/01/23/evidence-suggests-a-massive-scandal-is-brewing-at-the-fbi/
Click to expand...

Do you realize in that opinion piece every time the author refers to "agents" within the FBI he is talking about two people, that's two people, two people who are lovers conversing with each other in private Emails. And that's a "secret society?"

The missing texts don't prove anything other than texts are missing, at best, one could fabricate a connection claiming suspicious timing, but that on it's own is nothing more than a inneundo

And, again, Nunes, who as we know is the errand boy for the White House, put together a four page "memo" of what he thought was incriminating evidence of a conspiracy base upon review of thousands of pages of classified information. In other words, cherry picking bits out of context from documents he knows being classified and will never be totally reviewed by the public to frame a preset narrative. And you think missing texts is questionable?
 
archives said:
Do you realize in that opinion piece every time the author refers to "agents" within the FBI he is talking about two people, that's two people, two people who are lovers conversing with each other in private Emails. And that's a "secret society?"

The missing texts don't prove anything other than texts are missing, at best, one could fabricate a connection claiming suspicious timing, but that on it's own is nothing more than a inneundo

And, again, Nunes, who as we know is the errand boy for the White House, put together a four page "memo" of what he thought was incriminating evidence of a conspiracy base upon review of thousands of pages of classified information. In other words, cherry picking bits out of context from documents he knows being classified and will never be totally reviewed by the public to frame a preset narrative. And you think missing texts is questionable?
Click to expand...
Comey lied about finding Clinton innocent before her interview. It's not just "2" you have Bruce Ohr and his wife and a couple others I don't feel like looking up.

So missing Emails/texts in the Hillary investigation under subpoena - Lois Lehners missing Emails, and now 5 months of texts -all at critical ties of an investigation are what? "innuendo?" doesn't that strike you as a pattern?

As to"the memo" I'm waiting. I hear the claims too.
But I'm not going to say "gotcha" or anything else until they are released.

You know what's rubbery funny? They almost got away with all this - they were so sure Clinton would get elected.
Now it's time to pay the piper.
 
noise said:
yet you are so sure of Russian collusion based on what? Democratic hyperbole?

There are more and more dots..connect the data points is what is being done here.
Click to expand...

you are fox blind


fox doesn't tell you the facts


so you don't know they are real

not knowing they are real is not how facts get determined

Ignoring FACTS because a corporation refused to tell them to you and calling all others who report those facts liars



you will go down in history as one of the stupidest voting blocks ever manipulated
 
noise said:
Comey lied about finding Clinton innocent before her interview. It's not just "2" you have Bruce Ohr and his wife and a couple others I don't feel like looking up.

So missing Emails/texts in the Hillary investigation under subpoena - Lois Lehners missing Emails, and now 5 months of texts -all at critical ties of an investigation are what? "innuendo?" doesn't that strike you as a pattern?

As to"the memo" I'm waiting. I hear the claims too.
But I'm not going to say "gotcha" or anything else until they are released.

You know what's rubbery funny? They almost got away with all this - they were so sure Clinton would get elected.
Now it's time to pay the piper.
Click to expand...

links asshole


that is all worthless crap
 
archives said:
Do you realize in that opinion piece every time the author refers to "agents" within the FBI he is talking about two people, that's two people, two people who are lovers conversing with each other in private Emails. And that's a "secret society?"

The missing texts don't prove anything other than texts are missing, at best, one could fabricate a connection claiming suspicious timing, but that on it's own is nothing more than a inneundo

And, again, Nunes, who as we know is the errand boy for the White House, put together a four page "memo" of what he thought was incriminating evidence of a conspiracy base upon review of thousands of pages of classified information. In other words, cherry picking bits out of context from documents he knows being classified and will never be totally reviewed by the public to frame a preset narrative. And you think missing texts is questionable?
Click to expand...
Tip of the iceberg, Mueller had less than that to work with.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
noise said:
yet you are so sure of Russian collusion based on what? Democratic hyperbole?

There are more and more dots..connect the data points is what is being done here.
Click to expand...

Connect the dots on Russian collusion.
There are way more of them.
 
Havana Moon said:
Tip of the iceberg, Mueller had less than that to work with.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Much less indeed. So much less, that the facts of the Trump/Russian collusion farce investigation, have turned up the heat on the real collusion and corruption within the FBI and Justice department.
 
how many people are indicted already idiots


you hate our system


you want it replaced with trump sycophants
 
katzgar said:
evidence suggests you are pushing a right wing conspiracy theory. How is the weather in Moscow?
Click to expand...
Did you mean the deranged evince? Because even NPR is pushing this. It was headline news on Morning Edition today.
Cons have historically accused NPR as being left wing but I always considered NPR as being quite objective. Maybe you consider NPR to be on a level with Alex Jones?
Classified Memo, Missing Texts
https://www.npr.org/2018/01/24/5800...g-texts-get-caught-up-on-the-war-over-the-fbi
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top