Русский агент
Путин - мl
Wonder why freedumb never responded to this?
I did, and there's no proof that your pal was a Vietnam vet or a prison guard.
Wonder why freedumb never responded to this?
Prove he was in the system; because he could also say he was a CEO of Sears.
Prove he was in the system; because he could also say he was a CEO of Sears.
I did, and there's no proof that your pal was a Vietnam vet or a prison guard.
OH, don't try and assume that you have some ethical high ground; because you've also failed to see that your ridicule fits your criteria for that "loser" designation.
Do you need help seeing how you painted yourself into a corner or do you just want to act like you didn't?
Get out your red letters. Fat fingers little phone, small screen. How about ya read some of my other posts on the subject. Ya might realize that I have some experience here.
Either the jurors are uneducated in the use of force. Or they are like many people here and expect cops to act emotionally instead of professionally while expecting untrained citizens to act professionally instead of emotionally. Or this is another case where the prossicutor intentionally overcharged a cop knowing the crime would never meet the requirements.
I did, and there's no proof that your pal was a Vietnam vet or a prison guard.
Prove he's lying.
There is always the chance that he was "in the system"; but just not as he's presenting it.
There is always the chance that he was "in the system"; but just not as he's presenting it.
just admit you have zero clue how police union contracts garner policy violations as personnel records, as such are not available for public release. that's all you have to do.
OK; have him post his name, dates of employment, the name of his supervisor, and I'll do some research.
He's posted about his service many times since we knew him on the AOL forums, including his unit and other info. Sad that you have to doubt him just because he's liberal.
And you still have no clue as to how you painted yourself into a corner.
So sad
True. Weren't some Vietnam-era deserters imprisoned?
The same could be said for you.
Prove he's lying.
So you say, dummy.
I doubt him because that's what I do when someone makes a convenient claim in an attempt to use the "appeal to authority fallacy".
I'm thinking more along the lines of security fraud that crossed state lines or maybe a failed attempt at bank robbery.
Really? How do you have an "in" to getting that kind of info?