Getin the ring
Verified User
And ANOTHER nothing burger Thread reaches page 10 
Fox says Flynn will testify Rump ordered him to break the law!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Nomad
Verified User
So the question becomes.... if Flynn did nothing to lie about, WHY DID HE LIE ABOUT IT????
Got some of that good ol' fashioned right-wing bullshit spin to rub on that?
Hmmmm?
Nomad
Verified User
What's your beef about somebody else doing what you claim you do?
Superfreak
Verified User
Why are you trying to divert this to Comey? Did you even read the articles?
Strzok was NOT fired.
Strzok did NOT trash his superiors. He covered up for Clinton.
What else did he do that put his party above the people Desh?
Why do you hate FACTS desh?
Getin the ring
Verified User
nope, you seem to have it all figured out.
you know if Time magazine had a dumbass of the year award, I'd nominate you, you impress me that much
evince
Truthmatters
you re correct on the firing
my mistake
he was demoted to HR
now what was this cover up for clinton ?
changing the comey wording?
comey should thank him
waht he did say was bad enough
name one other head who trashed publically the person he was annoucing he was clearing of charges?
right in an ELECTION season
Nomad
Verified User
Superfreak
Verified User
Again... he changed the wording that made it NOT criminal on Hillary's behalf while at the same time promoting the fake dossier to investigate Trump. Given his political leanings, he was trying to manipulate the election in favor of Clinton. That is NOT what an FBI agent should be doing.
Cite?
Superfreak
Verified User
read the articles desh... he changed the wording to make it non-criminal behavior on the part of Clinton.
Superfreak
Verified User
already linked to it moron.
but here is another anyway...
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html
Where, the links I’ve seen don’t say that, candy!
or at at least not use the exact wording of the Espionage Act "gross negligence" statute
1) what are his political leanings?
2) where does it say he promoted the “fake dossier”?
evince
Truthmatters
and your claim is COMEY was about to indict her but this guy changed the text of the statement comey read?
why was she not indicted idiot?
because there was no crime
evince
Truthmatters
Superfreak
Verified User
again moron... already posted on this thread. In the post you quoted, I did an edit to put it there AGAIN, because you seem too ignorant to scroll up to the previous links.
Superfreak
Verified User
What in the dossier has been found to be true Desh?
Superfreak
Verified User
No moron. Not my claim. It was put forth by CNN and other news networks you worship. He changed the wording that would have meant criminal charges. He altered the wording so that they didn't have to press charges. Try reading for once.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html
"The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence.""