She didn’t even get a vote, she wasn’t even one of nine.
Sessions: 2nd Special Counsel Possible
- Thread starter PraiseKek
- Start date
She didn’t even get a vote, she wasn’t even one of nine.
A low level uranium deal that did not even allow uranium to leave the country was not something the Secretary of State would’ve been Involved in, this is simply sour grapes and an attempt by Old bone spur to appease his rabbid supporters
Irrelevant, she hired him through a lawyer representing her campaign:
When Fusion GPS lost funding from its Republican client, the contract for the opposition research project was picked up in April 2016 by Marc Elias, an attorney representing the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C., the Post reports. Through Elias’s law firm, Perkins Coie, the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C. continued to fund Steele’s research through the end of October.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-dossier
http://thefederalist.com/2017/10/25/top-10-things-to-know-about-dossier/
A) It was 20% of our strategic uranium reserves.
B) It has left the country.
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...deal-led-to-some-exports-to-europe-memos-show
Sure approval from the State Department doesn't require approval from the Secretary of State, I was born at night but not last night.
Getin the ring
Verified User
so what?
just when I think you have reached the top of your stupid tree, another limb grows.
If you, or anyone else does not think this whole Russian investigation is going to eventually end up in the laps of Clinton, The DNC and possibly even Obama then you are just not paying attention.
I spoke once about how far ahead Trump is in everything he does. Two, three steps ahead.
Every move he makes, firing Comey, appointing Mueller to the special prosecution knowing Mueller himself knew of Hillary's profiting from the Uranium One deal because he was head the FBI at the time, Trump appoints Sessions to the AG. Trump orderes Sessions and more directly the new FBI head Chris Wray to lift the gag order imposed by Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch on a key government informant with details on the inner working of the Uranium One deal, including Monies to the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clintons "coincidental" $500,ooo.oo speaking fee and meeting directly with Putin.
Trump as President immediately had access to this informant, thus the gag order being lifted. This informant, according to his or her own lawyer Victoria Toensing is fully cooperating with investigators, including Mueller's team.
And the investigation into that has been going on for months, led by Muellers then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, now the deputy FBI director, and then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, now the deputy attorney general.
Mueller's investigators on only the Uranium One part of the investigation in the Russia probe report to Rosenstein. This is almost Perry Mason like outsmarting the idiots.
At which time this informant mentions Muellers name, because it is reported that Mueller who was the FBI director should have reported to Obama his knowledge of the monies going to the Clinton Foundation during and immediately after the Uranium One Deal.
So Trump's strategy evolves around either Obama WAS told and still stayed quiet, or WASN'T told and Mueller not only will have to explain why but will have to recuse himself.
I know this may be hard for your little looney minds to follow, so don't even bother, just sit back and watch it unfold.
Citation? If it left the country it was not based on the deal you’re talking about.
Do you honestly believe the Secretary of State low level do you? Even if you were allegations are true she was the only one Of nine on a counsel.
floridafan
Verified User
Maybe Hillary forced each of the other 8 members to vote her way? Physically forced them, no less
Then physically threatened President Obama.
Getin the ring
Verified User
That's not what anyone is saying at all, simpletons.
But the only one who profited, so far as we know was the Clintons through the foundation, certainly worthy looking into. Even you would have to agree, you who thinks the Russia / Trump collusion investigation is worthy when you can't even explain what Trump / Russia Collusion means
But I think Monies to the Clinton Foundation FROM Russia just may be the elephant in the room.
Look if you want to have a legit conversation, you have to act like an adult.
But the only one who profited, so far as we know was the Clintons through the foundation, certainly worthy looking into. Even you would have to agree, you who thinks the Russia / Trump collusion investigation is worthy when you can't even explain what Trump / Russia Collusion means
But I think Monies to the Clinton Foundation FROM Russia just may be the elephant in the room.
Look if you want to have a legit conversation, you have to act like an adult.
That's not what anyone is saying at all, simpletons.
But the only one who profited, so far as we know was the Clintons through the foundation, certainly worthy looking into. Even you would have to agree, you who thinks the Russia / Trump collusion investigation is worthy when you can't even explain what Trump / Russia Collusion means
But I think Monies to the Clinton Foundation FROM Russia just may be the elephant in the room.
Look if you want to have a legit conversation, you have to act like an adult.
The Clintons did not profit from the uranium deal, that’s complete horseshit. I think you know that though.
floridafan
Verified User
The vast majority of the monies that were in question, that was donated to the Clinton Foundation was done so before she was SOS.
And after the guy who donated the money had retired.
Just an overt lie pal, these are the funds that are in question:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Mid-June 2009: ARMZ, “a wholly owned subsidiary of Rosatom completed a deal for 17 percent of Uranium One.” ARMZ/Rosatom takes steps to obtain larger shares in Uranium One and contacts the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for review and potential approval. (NYT 4/23/15)
2009: Uranium One’s Ian Telfer, through his family charity the Fernwood Foundation, donates $1 million to the Clinton Foundation, “the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help keep its mines in Kazakhstan.” (NYT 4/23/15)
2010: Telfer, through the Fernwood Foundation, donates $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation, “the year Russians sought majority control” of Uranium One. (NYT 4/23/15)
June 2010: Bill Clinton gives a speech in Moscow for a $500,000 fee, paid for by Renaissance Capital, “a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin,” and whose analysts “talked up Uranium One’s stock,” saying in a July 2010 report “that it was ‘the best play’ in the uranium markets.” (NYT 4/23/15)
October 2010: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approves the partial sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, which gives the Russians (and President Vladimir Putin) a 51 percent controlling stake in Uranium One. With this deal, Rosatom controls 20% of U.S. uranium production. Members of CFIUS included, among others, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and Attorney General Eric Holder. (*Bloomberg 10/18/2017 and NYT 4/23/15)
2011: Telfer, through the Ferwood Foundation, donates $600,000 to the Clinton Foundation. (NYT 4/23/15)
2012: Telfer, through the Ferwood Foundation, donates $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. (NYT 4/23/15)
2009-2012: Between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions were made to the Clinton Foundation by people “with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines.” (NYT 4/23/15)
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...nium-exec-gave-313-million-clinton-foundation
Liar:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Mid-June 2009: ARMZ, “a wholly owned subsidiary of Rosatom completed a deal for 17 percent of Uranium One.” ARMZ/Rosatom takes steps to obtain larger shares in Uranium One and contacts the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for review and potential approval. (NYT 4/23/15)
2009: Uranium One’s Ian Telfer, through his family charity the Fernwood Foundation, donates $1 million to the Clinton Foundation, “the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help keep its mines in Kazakhstan.” (NYT 4/23/15)
2010: Telfer, through the Fernwood Foundation, donates $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation, “the year Russians sought majority control” of Uranium One. (NYT 4/23/15)
June 2010: Bill Clinton gives a speech in Moscow for a $500,000 fee, paid for by Renaissance Capital, “a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin,” and whose analysts “talked up Uranium One’s stock,” saying in a July 2010 report “that it was ‘the best play’ in the uranium markets.” (NYT 4/23/15)
October 2010: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approves the partial sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, which gives the Russians (and President Vladimir Putin) a 51 percent controlling stake in Uranium One. With this deal, Rosatom controls 20% of U.S. uranium production. Members of CFIUS included, among others, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and Attorney General Eric Holder. (*Bloomberg 10/18/2017 and NYT 4/23/15)
2011: Telfer, through the Ferwood Foundation, donates $600,000 to the Clinton Foundation. (NYT 4/23/15)
2012: Telfer, through the Ferwood Foundation, donates $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. (NYT 4/23/15)
2009-2012: Between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions were made to the Clinton Foundation by people “with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines.” (NYT 4/23/15)
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...nium-exec-gave-313-million-clinton-foundation
Getin the ring
Verified User
Oh what a tangled web we weave.
This could finally bring the Clintons to their deserved fate.
History books are already being written burying them with the Kenyan president on the "lower" side of the lawn
This could finally bring the Clintons to their deserved fate.
History books are already being written burying them with the Kenyan president on the "lower" side of the lawn
Superfreak
Verified User
you understand The UK is not in the US... right???
It wasn't low level again it was 20% of our strategic uranium reserves and part of Putin's bid to corner the global nuclear energy market, the deal was worth $billions. And these aren't my allegations, it is a fact that the deal needed State Department approval to go forward, your assertions that as head of the DOS she had nothing to do with it, are simply not tenable.
And you keep bringing up the other 8 agencies as if that means something, I am not asserting that she was the only one who was corrupted, to the contrary, she is the only one that we have direct evidence of pay to play but she sure as hell wasn't the only one, for instancs both Mueller and Comey had knowledge of the FBI informant against Rosatom, alleging racketeering, bribery, and blackmail and still allowed the deal to forward, hell not only did Holder as head of main justice sign off on the deal he slapped a gag order on the informant. Ask yourself why he would do that.